Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030231AbWCWL6j (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Mar 2006 06:58:39 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030242AbWCWL6j (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Mar 2006 06:58:39 -0500 Received: from tristate.vision.ee ([194.204.30.144]:11994 "HELO mail.city.ee") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1030231AbWCWL6i (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Mar 2006 06:58:38 -0500 Message-ID: <44228D6D.4060405@vision.ee> Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 13:58:37 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?TGVuYXIgTMO1aG11cw==?= User-Agent: Mail/News 1.5 (X11/20060309) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Con Kolivas CC: Andrew Morton , ck@vds.kolivas.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [ck] swap prefetching merge plans References: <20060322205305.0604f49b.akpm@osdl.org> <200603231804.36334.kernel@kolivas.org> In-Reply-To: <200603231804.36334.kernel@kolivas.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1719 Lines: 41 Con Kolivas wrote: > On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 03:53 pm, Andrew Morton wrote: > >> Still don't have a compelling argument for this, IMO. >> I bet there are tons and tons of very big iron server related stuff merged daily for which ordinary Linux desktop users can't find any compelling reasons why are those merged. That luckily doesn't mean they are not useful. At least for some groups for some corner cases. It's the same with this patch. There are users who really find this patch useful. It's showing real benefit which many can feel right away. It's not like getting a percent more of speed out of some micro-benchmark. I really do not like vanilla kernel in the mornings when everything slowly crawls back (and sometimes it seems for hours). With this patch it feels like there were no night in between. We, Linux desktop users really like this. Why not merge this? It's not like it's very intrusive patch. It's the only reason why I compile my own kernels for my Ubuntu. And I actually would like to spend that time one something more useful. And when Con says it might consider dropping this wonderful patch all together when mainline doesn't want it - I'm kind of shocked. No, I do not blame Con, he really has tried very hard to get this included and all he gets is brick wall. He doesn't deserve this I think. But anyway I would be very sorry to see this patch sent to oblivion. This is all I wanted to say and I hope it made difference a bit, Lenar - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/