Received: by 2002:a05:6902:102b:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x11csp2009647ybt; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 15:44:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyqnFTxhOUL8crusccwqGvdXO6CQWcMDd4jFy9SQfjwokmCbGwSyhU8om0LxWg2EOQLk8Vy X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:48d8:: with SMTP id d24mr29629ejt.369.1592261093489; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 15:44:53 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1592261093; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=oIlanOMRiJEt1POMOsMSuD2tuQK+Onmxxs3456IMmNSekJIF5gMDQEf1jqXeDHXL8+ PFAiFdMU2xg/WSCl+yoWe/P8tqxDYXM2WLWvWDdOtrPeH/Acyc1a2uWRYz7DKehb4mIQ yXw5Cvivj/G1EyKriK//c6BRJUHRRC9MXRXoJd4FmIrn4JiGRwHvlpjg8WTqeefY7oMG xXxJI4yRHbZ6o8mhPpRaV90QcZBKXhOeF0IKJIgEkkpKFqMoUU4o9S2KRmmZamrg7iDC OHck5C067JDXAn/Nzz7YHxiQMHBYMiBCF7xvEovzpYaU4la7YHo4bHrPQZW2Vr3dZB/W evzg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=f5KuxdpNrBEu0cpaSlj94kBujql/OxPm2dKrmMy10+E=; b=T9elRWWlGDGnTY5O7BCwhB35aUSsWKvNkqkhQ709z6kS6CyOd2T18bikFxvnoCFSAc pF96ANHoq9lT8z8hX3t9O9MMLHGaj1wqMr4ayyzEIqVd9ibbCbo8cWR1YVTC54poCI4f GzDsDnyPLjMaTDUhC0dWRgmBpT20npPi565Q6/6TrMM/t9eoU7iiZSuGJZIXa6qKufUe 2uyg12x2IRtMbRY3poiymper4mPecmZAwsJy4GQcd7UCirCGnY230oA5P26t780+jrsk NqD0qdK73aYyCpcnCqrYm5JTofWAgX3CWuk1+vmSMmDl8uPBNCgdsea16s9XMkuyVz1J NcgQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id j21si9701724ejm.613.2020.06.15.15.44.31; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 15:44:53 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726514AbgFOWmV (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 15 Jun 2020 18:42:21 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:55808 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726351AbgFOWmV (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Jun 2020 18:42:21 -0400 Received: from oasis.local.home (cpe-66-24-58-225.stny.res.rr.com [66.24.58.225]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9A8E52074D; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 22:42:20 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2020 18:42:18 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: Randy Dunlap Cc: Joe Perches , Masami Hiramatsu , stable@vger.kernel.org, LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] proc/bootconfig: Fix to use correct quotes for value Message-ID: <20200615184218.752a17fa@oasis.local.home> In-Reply-To: References: <159197538852.80267.10091816844311950396.stgit@devnote2> <159197539793.80267.10836787284189465765.stgit@devnote2> <20200615151139.5cc223fc@oasis.local.home> <7abefbc81fc6aaefed6bbd2117e7bc97b90babe9.camel@perches.com> <20200615172123.1fe77f3c@oasis.local.home> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.3 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 15 Jun 2020 15:30:41 -0700 Randy Dunlap wrote: > >> Please don't infect kernel sources with that style oddity. > > > > What do you mean? It's already "infected" all over the kernel, (has > > been for years!) and I kinda like it. It makes reading variables much > > easier on the eyes, and as I get older, that means a lot more ;-) > > Yeah, there is some infection, more in some places than others, > but I agree with Joe -- it's not needed or wanted by some of us. We all have preferences. But for code that I need to review, I prefer it. Why would you be bothered by it? Which is easier on the eyes to read variables? struct xbc_node *leaf, *vnode; const char *val; char q; char *key, *end = dst + size; int ret = 0; or struct xbc_node *leaf, *vnode; char *key, *end = dst + size; const char *val; char q; int ret = 0; ? -- Steve