Received: by 2002:a05:6902:102b:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x11csp2104045ybt; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 18:58:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwsw/eJ4rCV9r318v5jcqjz1KX48RyjccjidXZalAZWC5JewnOJYk8MiITmxjyPpvEPoCMd X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:b15:: with SMTP id h21mr621530ejl.450.1592272703152; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 18:58:23 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1592272703; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=dA/nVn5PXWEM9f0W23ObwdCU8qNpYSlcn+ls6TMscE5RjezvuJXiu7BdhQOrcyPWk7 w/2sQTFF26Zgv1YzsuakJTuZAHGTpyk9cPD1dmRM6nxwxqgLtql9GNQRyvOInLEpyCL0 WvZFhESX3p/fSMyrswK9Z6haswM4wwPnyKNOt/nIBEWBX8+ToUzyxrQk+wG2aShpPp5L QweEk33jFgelHJBLtfXCNMrAFlIhsqkKRM3L+/4prXnXCb8WMXViwx3q+joYycicRqSO HcQFoO6yO5uizfEIXPRTQwpuq//0pKBkTaXBOl9DMWLQrzWxta6NhOqYbFXjSD6Iu1pb iOcQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=KsyypAzFsnAyMtkg0SUHRWIDqrfnrJOwHkv8H23gAlQ=; b=H/HY54YiM4Fhwlbt932/jpTWzbwl8L1uhxSKvO2K1ua4s+Yg7Drw9vjF0Jc5TdlXqH mUYyPQikgf7rppQ86tyNeZPRlqvolHHYLVem1NWt92d5XJ2rfHxE8gr8U6CCjgzmb4Ts k9YQ/BgdYqa2xch70ieAJOqt9eLNlw35iM3nA54INmO7g7GzmMA7tL9Ppvbej/AKV4gW X1Vnx+TTjy+x6KJLvjLZ1AD0HPMI0rAgtQztb+RJl3iBANDiL9MUZ+DVqfKskCyC5+bo oyjYrReKtDFNo4av7QKQSuzm86vVKG/zktU2DPjXvrfUHWcYFRXZFBXdvnEV7FOOjjYX Iy/g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b="Y5LNBkn/"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id z14si9644198eji.192.2020.06.15.18.57.59; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 18:58:23 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b="Y5LNBkn/"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726317AbgFPB4O (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 15 Jun 2020 21:56:14 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:59290 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725984AbgFPB4N (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Jun 2020 21:56:13 -0400 Received: from mail-il1-x144.google.com (mail-il1-x144.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::144]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7288EC061A0E for ; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 18:56:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-il1-x144.google.com with SMTP id j19so13169336ilk.9 for ; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 18:56:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=KsyypAzFsnAyMtkg0SUHRWIDqrfnrJOwHkv8H23gAlQ=; b=Y5LNBkn/0ZUI0zOHp2QPPEoJFu4XhUtCiFSn3fgmwYLKkwlwDxJgEZaQ+MzGbxq1EA X1MlTnpebD+YhI0iV3HJly1sGndQgXkdae8NNJUt/l1hDZSqeHq2CVy9w3PnImy4rH4j IeSKzH7QdFTv9jS3JAtAidJYDD7uSayV/CNeTcimaJMV47DGfZKQQ3GCo0gCj8O5P/5M +iR0QtxsXkVn8CP+IPH3m2y/+zowI1pmw13AfjUPg1qXz4qSg1GpNzSZCAkMDRcoHf08 Fz6W3TZCeKxZhvLlHJWwSAJZMrbDBIZyI5NCob8NU0O98/tBj7hBO40rqLvfkXZWKUOh bUuQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=KsyypAzFsnAyMtkg0SUHRWIDqrfnrJOwHkv8H23gAlQ=; b=JiiNtrxFuBztDabRL9XwuuUIvXhfsTYugycY3BXFQ29YTTNYaMB/lC5MDhKr5M6One UF6RVPNI0LgWHm9KW/R9+HN7/3cddWrmLXuKscw9BTX7ViZ/NASfg4X0zWTk3q52/LgY uHgbfIo08SiYtsFHEAY4og6ozFOHTwVEsvs0Q2aCrzFYqnd0hpY4Kg90N0ltFO1hlv6s SC2ksCSTyBYgjUXXhO//BIn+FGbwdyRw8uoeYWgni0eIgVrbLullopze2TeHd0auju/G mqPa9SIMJWHm7t0c8Y0RJ0ugeAS/VSlZ02n8XtleStFPf9F/8h5+RTpEv2bV6SWZL20L JufA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5324aGpxT0Uuf6rWU0bX5W88Qef7K0pll1gr703/pG5g0cMUHM2n sq2yJnyco/yzkd6uEv+SOBO7WZOJQt9DeAVk7BtZXVkGoNA= X-Received: by 2002:a92:a1d1:: with SMTP id b78mr898263ill.164.1592272571875; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 18:56:11 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <87mu5roov6.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> <20200529082618.1697-1-laijs@linux.alibaba.com> In-Reply-To: From: Lai Jiangshan Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 09:56:00 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 0/4] x86/entry: simply stack switching when exception on userspace To: Andy Lutomirski Cc: Lai Jiangshan , LKML , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , X86 ML , "H. Peter Anvin" , Peter Zijlstra , Alexandre Chartre , "Eric W. Biederman" , Jann Horn , Dave Hansen Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 2:33 AM Andy Lutomirski wrote: > > On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 1:26 AM Lai Jiangshan wrote: > > > > 7f2590a110b8("x86/entry/64: Use a per-CPU trampoline stack for IDT entries") > > has resulted that when exception on userspace, the kernel (error_entry) > > always push the pt_regs to entry stack(sp0), and then copy them to the > > kernel stack. > > > > And recent x86/entry work makes interrupt also use idtentry > > and makes all the interrupt code save the pt_regs on the sp0 stack > > and then copy it to the thread stack like exception. > > > > This is hot path (page fault, ipi), such overhead should be avoided. > > And the original interrupt_entry directly switches to kernel stack > > and pushes pt_regs to kernel stack. We should do it for error_entry. > > This is the job of patch1. > > > > Patch 2-4 simply stack switching for .Lerror_bad_iret by just doing > > all the work in one function (fixup_bad_iret()). > > > > The patch set is based on tip/x86/entry (28447ea41542) (May 20). > > There are definitely good cleanups in here, but I think it would be > nice rebased to whatever lands in 5.8-rc1 settles. > Hello, All This patchset can be smoothly applicable to the newest tip/x86/entry which has 5.8-rc1 merged. Which means I don't have to respin/resend it until any update is needed. Could you have a review on it please. Thanks Lai