Received: by 2002:a05:6902:102b:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x11csp2131653ybt; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 20:03:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz5+MVzCDD44+sb8rYQMqSCjMcaITC/PbFakjpoiKsKjHLA56st9qxaiaAsLvdul6rpfFIi X-Received: by 2002:a50:b065:: with SMTP id i92mr758198edd.112.1592276580549; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 20:03:00 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1592276580; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=OYIMvr8TV9izOkKikr7pbrble3y7FaVwpG2nNduSkF2KBhXqQTEY09XCYY0oz1MkQb zd/+N/fQcDthI9SdoJiXdFpewdVhCsOnaSAF/I6LajFQ8wLQUfV3LeMrs6W2EC3cyr6C VsJgyVaBGQAmUsCwRnjzNlRbtncdsF02rkGFjLq4fHTW3tPGJKli0j+UXongUdJDWVtO Jw1gBp/UOod4rv8dmzW+EGMkJRPQlpyNE8TrUHD4OpmgcXDAmeKUD/FcQ2J09TtAHAmb MLwm/uy471VMPrfVK22YBEho/974scF5fn8Guh+BulYMVJnUuYncNDu3VA2gsD44J8C/ hcTw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-language :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject:ironport-sdr:ironport-sdr; bh=Rc01+8kJK6MC0YlHHrFPbNBPKZblkF4lgjg0qN4RbDs=; b=b50N/CMuRVDUr6KgfM0FZk/rtASTuiXOK7D/q9QSWV4IqIqtMtsyvFvRGVeUScQfbj l3I/vZrPFDlSFlJu/MQ/sx+Qh82hC+P+y2OjyrhmfW0SK3YzDL+EorRwQQ44WKHjUL/A C9m7v9pky6xAWF4Meq7de4iBfZUx/uqP19isicEXgwFyrc8wUkcJ1QHBrLVVJ44LvdLi 56eH6GFxQMjwOmuQZbwXFJfAalH8WLwT4Bf7exNhBVnZpfJYcqUQQWn+XlZRPfJsO75D phG7jvzC3rop1NcfhdvylDN/10+Arsv9gOndfYPVFLuBN3IXCec5eq87aRyJxfzHRMj9 Q/9A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id r25si9545764ejz.752.2020.06.15.20.02.35; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 20:03:00 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726392AbgFPC6l (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 15 Jun 2020 22:58:41 -0400 Received: from mga03.intel.com ([134.134.136.65]:35336 "EHLO mga03.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726044AbgFPC6k (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Jun 2020 22:58:40 -0400 IronPort-SDR: Nuf4ZmwjQtTi+CzsBRVakhNcYQd2JoER3aMjCGj9/VL/Yen7T1fOTeUgMKxTQsHSBb6XgxPwRH RuJhOfiYKwwg== X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga007.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.58]) by orsmga103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 15 Jun 2020 19:51:22 -0700 IronPort-SDR: kcgBMKaGzUMMBZ2cMl5EFzoI1KG5QXbbKXYW5V9dtNyehdlWXAMVQscrjJnhP3NSbT/Ybkx4O9 8QP0CYV6LD9g== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.73,517,1583222400"; d="scan'208";a="261998515" Received: from shao2-debian.sh.intel.com (HELO [10.239.13.3]) ([10.239.13.3]) by orsmga007.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 15 Jun 2020 19:51:20 -0700 Subject: Re: [btrfs] e678934cbe: reaim.jobs_per_min -30.7% regression To: Filipe Manana , Nikolay Borisov Cc: David Sterba , LKML , lkp@lists.01.org References: <20200611090233.GL12456@shao2-debian> <7b474586-0d13-5a9d-8aed-17a99b69d80b@suse.com> From: Rong Chen Message-ID: Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 10:51:03 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <7b474586-0d13-5a9d-8aed-17a99b69d80b@suse.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 6/12/20 7:50 PM, Filipe Manana wrote: > > On 11/06/20 10:02, kernel test robot wrote: >> Greeting, >> >> FYI, we noticed a -30.7% regression of reaim.jobs_per_min due to commit: > > Hello, > > In the future, can you please always CC linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org for > btrfs related reports? Thanks for the advice, we'll cc the mailing list next time. Best Regards, Rong Chen > > Thanks. > >> >> commit: e678934cbe5f026c2765a1da651e61daa5724fb3 ("btrfs: Remove unnecessary check from join_running_log_trans") >> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master >> >> in testcase: reaim >> on test machine: 96 threads Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6252 CPU @ 2.10GHz with 256G memory >> with following parameters: >> >> runtime: 300s >> nr_task: 100 >> disk: 1HDD >> fs: btrfs >> test: disk >> cpufreq_governor: performance >> ucode: 0x500002c >> >> test-description: REAIM is an updated and improved version of AIM 7 benchmark. >> test-url: https://sourceforge.net/projects/re-aim-7/ >> >> >> >> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag >> Reported-by: kernel test robot >> >> >> Details are as below: >> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------> >> >> >> To reproduce: >> >> git clone https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests.git >> cd lkp-tests >> bin/lkp install job.yaml # job file is attached in this email >> bin/lkp run job.yaml >> >> ========================================================================================= >> compiler/cpufreq_governor/disk/fs/kconfig/nr_task/rootfs/runtime/tbox_group/test/testcase/ucode: >> gcc-9/performance/1HDD/btrfs/x86_64-rhel-7.6/100/debian-x86_64-20191114.cgz/300s/lkp-csl-2sp6/disk/reaim/0x500002c >> >> commit: >> 32e534402a ("Btrfs: wake up inode cache waiters sooner to reduce waiting time") >> e678934cbe ("btrfs: Remove unnecessary check from join_running_log_trans") >> >> 32e534402ad52e9f e678934cbe5f026c2765a1da651 >> ---------------- --------------------------- >> fail:runs %reproduction fail:runs >> | | | >> :4 25% 1:4 dmesg.WARNING:at#for_ip_swapgs_restore_regs_and_return_to_usermode/0x >> %stddev %change %stddev >> \ | \ >> 5.39 +6.4% 5.73 ? 6% reaim.child_utime >> 6882 ? 2% -30.7% 4771 ? 2% reaim.jobs_per_min >> 68.82 ? 2% -30.7% 47.72 ? 2% reaim.jobs_per_min_child >> 98.56 -3.4% 95.25 reaim.jti >> 6978 ? 2% -29.5% 4917 ? 2% reaim.max_jobs_per_min >> 87.24 ? 2% +44.3% 125.92 ? 2% reaim.parent_time >> 0.97 ? 5% +337.7% 4.26 ? 9% reaim.std_dev_percent >> 0.84 ? 5% +504.3% 5.05 ? 7% reaim.std_dev_time >> 357.77 ? 2% +7.4% 384.27 ? 2% reaim.time.elapsed_time >> 357.77 ? 2% +7.4% 384.27 ? 2% reaim.time.elapsed_time.max >> 276434 -25.6% 205672 reaim.time.file_system_inputs >> 10740316 -20.1% 8583748 ? 2% reaim.time.file_system_outputs >> 63443 -13.8% 54688 reaim.time.involuntary_context_switches >> 6205791 -24.9% 4661554 reaim.time.minor_page_faults >> 84.25 ? 2% -34.4% 55.25 ? 11% reaim.time.percent_of_cpu_this_job_got >> 281.73 -30.3% 196.49 ? 11% reaim.time.system_time >> 21.59 -20.2% 17.23 ? 6% reaim.time.user_time >> 2253123 -10.4% 2017718 reaim.time.voluntary_context_switches >> 40000 -25.0% 30000 reaim.workload >> 92.59 +2.6% 95.01 iostat.cpu.idle >> 6.37 -32.9% 4.27 iostat.cpu.iowait >> 0.97 ? 4% -32.4% 0.65 ? 13% iostat.cpu.system >> 6.41 -2.1 4.29 mpstat.cpu.all.iowait% >> 0.02 ? 6% -0.0 0.01 ? 4% mpstat.cpu.all.soft% >> 0.95 ? 4% -0.3 0.64 ? 13% mpstat.cpu.all.sys% >> 0.07 ? 2% -0.0 0.06 ? 3% mpstat.cpu.all.usr% >> 3177396 ? 4% -17.2% 2630192 ? 2% numa-numastat.node0.local_node >> 3208408 ? 3% -17.3% 2653430 ? 3% numa-numastat.node0.numa_hit >> 3183435 ? 4% -21.0% 2515397 ? 2% numa-numastat.node1.local_node >> 3183678 ? 4% -20.7% 2523398 ? 2% numa-numastat.node1.numa_hit >> 92.00 +2.4% 94.25 vmstat.cpu.id >> 382.00 -30.6% 265.25 vmstat.io.bi >> 26136 -29.9% 18312 vmstat.io.bo >> 6.00 -37.5% 3.75 ? 11% vmstat.procs.b >> 20123 ? 2% -19.6% 16189 vmstat.system.cs >> 1044628 -21.1% 824233 ? 4% meminfo.Active >> 758190 -28.5% 542058 ? 7% meminfo.Active(file) >> 163791 +76.7% 289387 ? 6% meminfo.Inactive >> 145927 +86.1% 271504 ? 6% meminfo.Inactive(file) >> 10778 -11.3% 9561 ? 2% meminfo.PageTables >> 9802 ? 2% -10.0% 8822 meminfo.max_used_kB >> 393822 ? 4% -27.8% 284411 ? 6% numa-meminfo.node0.Active(file) >> 82276 +84.5% 151788 ? 6% numa-meminfo.node0.Inactive >> 75693 ? 6% +88.5% 142679 ? 7% numa-meminfo.node0.Inactive(file) >> 507925 -30.0% 355305 ? 10% numa-meminfo.node1.Active >> 364589 ? 5% -29.3% 257593 ? 8% numa-meminfo.node1.Active(file) >> 81386 ? 2% +69.3% 137792 ? 7% numa-meminfo.node1.Inactive >> 70106 ? 5% +84.0% 129017 ? 5% numa-meminfo.node1.Inactive(file) >> 50197 ? 5% -11.4% 44453 ? 9% numa-meminfo.node1.KReclaimable >> 50197 ? 5% -11.4% 44453 ? 9% numa-meminfo.node1.SReclaimable >> 9800 -18.9% 7948 ? 2% slabinfo.Acpi-State.active_objs >> 9800 -18.9% 7948 ? 2% slabinfo.Acpi-State.num_objs >> 61202 -10.9% 54561 slabinfo.anon_vma_chain.active_objs >> 957.00 -10.9% 852.50 slabinfo.anon_vma_chain.active_slabs >> 61275 -10.9% 54584 slabinfo.anon_vma_chain.num_objs >> 957.00 -10.9% 852.50 slabinfo.anon_vma_chain.num_slabs >> 7797 -32.6% 5252 ? 5% slabinfo.btrfs_inode.active_objs >> 7797 -32.6% 5252 ? 5% slabinfo.btrfs_inode.num_objs >> 11253 ? 3% -18.5% 9167 ? 5% slabinfo.kmalloc-192.active_objs >> 11446 ? 3% -18.2% 9362 ? 5% slabinfo.kmalloc-192.num_objs >> 14849 ? 2% -24.5% 11214 ? 9% slabinfo.mnt_cache.active_objs >> 15056 -24.2% 11408 ? 9% slabinfo.mnt_cache.num_objs >> 53294 -21.2% 42015 ? 5% slabinfo.numa_policy.active_objs >> 864.00 -21.6% 677.50 ? 5% slabinfo.numa_policy.active_slabs >> 53592 -21.6% 42027 ? 5% slabinfo.numa_policy.num_objs >> 864.00 -21.6% 677.50 ? 5% slabinfo.numa_policy.num_slabs >> 98443 ? 4% -27.7% 71126 ? 6% numa-vmstat.node0.nr_active_file >> 388731 ? 4% -19.3% 313594 ? 2% numa-vmstat.node0.nr_dirtied >> 18914 ? 6% +88.6% 35671 ? 7% numa-vmstat.node0.nr_inactive_file >> 380485 ? 4% -18.1% 311805 ? 2% numa-vmstat.node0.nr_written >> 98443 ? 4% -27.7% 71126 ? 6% numa-vmstat.node0.nr_zone_active_file >> 18914 ? 6% +88.6% 35671 ? 7% numa-vmstat.node0.nr_zone_inactive_file >> 2280462 ? 3% -11.6% 2015812 ? 7% numa-vmstat.node0.numa_hit >> 2248911 ? 3% -11.4% 1992035 ? 7% numa-vmstat.node0.numa_local >> 91143 ? 5% -29.3% 64421 ? 8% numa-vmstat.node1.nr_active_file >> 365567 ? 4% -20.3% 291379 ? 4% numa-vmstat.node1.nr_dirtied >> 17511 ? 5% +84.2% 32252 ? 5% numa-vmstat.node1.nr_inactive_file >> 12549 ? 5% -11.4% 11114 ? 9% numa-vmstat.node1.nr_slab_reclaimable >> 357895 ? 4% -19.1% 289635 ? 4% numa-vmstat.node1.nr_written >> 91143 ? 5% -29.3% 64421 ? 8% numa-vmstat.node1.nr_zone_active_file >> 17511 ? 5% +84.2% 32252 ? 5% numa-vmstat.node1.nr_zone_inactive_file >> 2266610 ? 3% -16.4% 1894459 ? 6% numa-vmstat.node1.numa_hit >> 2086214 ? 3% -18.2% 1706683 ? 6% numa-vmstat.node1.numa_local >> 71614 -1.5% 70550 proc-vmstat.nr_active_anon >> 189614 -28.6% 135443 ? 7% proc-vmstat.nr_active_file >> 70104 -1.4% 69155 proc-vmstat.nr_anon_pages >> 1488872 -19.1% 1204232 ? 2% proc-vmstat.nr_dirtied >> 523478 -4.4% 500692 proc-vmstat.nr_file_pages >> 36441 +86.5% 67961 ? 6% proc-vmstat.nr_inactive_file >> 19617 -2.9% 19052 proc-vmstat.nr_kernel_stack >> 2693 -11.3% 2390 ? 2% proc-vmstat.nr_page_table_pages >> 22683 -4.7% 21619 proc-vmstat.nr_slab_reclaimable >> 50336 -3.6% 48543 proc-vmstat.nr_slab_unreclaimable >> 89.00 ? 15% -65.7% 30.50 ? 42% proc-vmstat.nr_writeback >> 1455988 -17.8% 1196186 ? 2% proc-vmstat.nr_written >> 71614 -1.5% 70550 proc-vmstat.nr_zone_active_anon >> 189614 -28.6% 135443 ? 7% proc-vmstat.nr_zone_active_file >> 36441 +86.5% 67961 ? 6% proc-vmstat.nr_zone_inactive_file >> 2776 ?107% -99.0% 28.25 ?147% proc-vmstat.numa_hint_faults_local >> 6417381 -18.9% 5202057 proc-vmstat.numa_hit >> 6386111 -19.0% 5170800 proc-vmstat.numa_local >> 306132 +14.7% 351100 proc-vmstat.pgactivate >> 6709006 -19.1% 5428521 proc-vmstat.pgalloc_normal >> 1457 ? 8% -12.0% 1282 ? 3% proc-vmstat.pgdeactivate >> 7158861 -20.7% 5673879 proc-vmstat.pgfault >> 6408449 -19.9% 5130409 proc-vmstat.pgfree >> 138345 -25.7% 102836 proc-vmstat.pgpgin >> 9452237 -25.0% 7088229 ? 3% proc-vmstat.pgpgout >> 26661 -20.8% 21116 ? 2% proc-vmstat.pgrotated >> 1844 ? 7% -33.1% 1234 ? 12% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.exec_clock.avg >> 1505 ? 7% -38.7% 923.14 ? 14% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.exec_clock.min >> 54.76 ? 10% +33.5% 73.09 ? 14% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.load_avg.stddev >> 95267 ? 6% -10.4% 85364 ? 6% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.min_vruntime.max >> 9148 ? 7% -17.4% 7559 ? 11% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.min_vruntime.stddev >> 1.75 ? 10% +35.4% 2.36 ? 10% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.runnable_load_avg.avg >> 119.14 ? 6% +47.1% 175.24 ? 11% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.runnable_load_avg.max >> 12.85 ? 5% +45.6% 18.71 ? 11% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.runnable_load_avg.stddev >> 9148 ? 7% -17.4% 7560 ? 11% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.spread0.stddev >> 111.56 ? 11% -22.9% 86.03 ? 8% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.util_avg.avg >> 1.92 ?142% -96.3% 0.07 ?173% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.util_avg.min >> 43523 ? 7% -28.3% 31204 ? 7% sched_debug.cpu.curr->pid.max >> 36713 ? 7% -21.7% 28764 ? 7% sched_debug.cpu.nr_switches.avg >> 81053 ? 6% -25.8% 60160 ? 6% sched_debug.cpu.nr_switches.max >> 27742 ? 9% -22.3% 21563 ? 7% sched_debug.cpu.nr_switches.min >> 6727 ? 5% -21.5% 5279 ? 5% sched_debug.cpu.nr_switches.stddev >> 49.15 ? 9% -25.3% 36.73 ? 5% sched_debug.cpu.nr_uninterruptible.max >> 21.72 ? 5% -28.2% 15.59 ? 7% sched_debug.cpu.nr_uninterruptible.stddev >> 36248 ? 7% -22.7% 28023 ? 7% sched_debug.cpu.sched_count.avg >> 79747 ? 6% -26.2% 58891 ? 6% sched_debug.cpu.sched_count.max >> 27418 ? 9% -23.6% 20937 ? 8% sched_debug.cpu.sched_count.min >> 6826 ? 5% -23.6% 5213 ? 6% sched_debug.cpu.sched_count.stddev >> 17024 ? 7% -22.6% 13178 ? 7% sched_debug.cpu.sched_goidle.avg >> 36338 ? 6% -25.3% 27136 ? 6% sched_debug.cpu.sched_goidle.max >> 12859 ? 9% -23.9% 9780 ? 8% sched_debug.cpu.sched_goidle.min >> 3065 ? 5% -21.4% 2411 ? 6% sched_debug.cpu.sched_goidle.stddev >> 17247 ? 7% -22.7% 13336 ? 7% sched_debug.cpu.ttwu_count.avg >> 158379 ? 8% -26.5% 116451 ? 8% sched_debug.cpu.ttwu_count.max >> 10466 ? 9% -21.9% 8171 ? 8% sched_debug.cpu.ttwu_count.min >> 14739 ? 8% -26.7% 10796 ? 8% sched_debug.cpu.ttwu_count.stddev >> 1635 ? 8% -18.2% 1338 ? 7% sched_debug.cpu.ttwu_local.avg >> 22339 ? 8% -31.2% 15365 ? 7% sched_debug.cpu.ttwu_local.max >> 814.63 ? 15% -22.1% 634.73 ? 6% sched_debug.cpu.ttwu_local.min >> 2155 ? 8% -32.0% 1466 ? 7% sched_debug.cpu.ttwu_local.stddev >> 29.24 ? 56% -30.4% 20.35 ? 70% perf-stat.i.MPKI >> 3.626e+08 ? 3% -16.0% 3.045e+08 ? 5% perf-stat.i.branch-instructions >> 3.86 ? 42% -1.0 2.85 ? 44% perf-stat.i.branch-miss-rate% >> 14174438 ? 36% -36.3% 9031272 ? 32% perf-stat.i.branch-misses >> 47929206 ? 53% -43.8% 26957442 ? 60% perf-stat.i.cache-references >> 20264 ? 2% -19.7% 16279 perf-stat.i.context-switches >> 6.435e+09 ? 15% -25.7% 4.779e+09 ? 9% perf-stat.i.cpu-cycles >> 635.90 ? 4% -43.7% 358.03 ? 3% perf-stat.i.cpu-migrations >> 4.497e+08 ? 2% -16.5% 3.756e+08 ? 5% perf-stat.i.dTLB-loads >> 2.237e+08 -14.1% 1.923e+08 ? 4% perf-stat.i.dTLB-stores >> 1.766e+09 ? 2% -16.5% 1.474e+09 ? 5% perf-stat.i.instructions >> 1312 ? 13% -20.7% 1040 ? 9% perf-stat.i.instructions-per-iTLB-miss >> 0.07 ? 15% -25.7% 0.05 ? 9% perf-stat.i.metric.GHz >> 11.32 -17.0% 9.39 ? 3% perf-stat.i.metric.M/sec >> 19413 ? 2% -26.0% 14368 ? 2% perf-stat.i.minor-faults >> 852393 ? 2% -24.3% 645664 ? 4% perf-stat.i.node-load-misses >> 102904 ? 3% -33.7% 68205 ? 4% perf-stat.i.node-loads >> 338073 ? 2% -25.7% 251343 ? 5% perf-stat.i.node-store-misses >> 64597 ? 13% -37.7% 40227 ? 21% perf-stat.i.node-stores >> 19413 ? 2% -26.0% 14368 ? 2% perf-stat.i.page-faults >> 27.55 ? 55% -31.9% 18.76 ? 66% perf-stat.overall.MPKI >> 3.95 ? 38% -0.9 3.01 ? 36% perf-stat.overall.branch-miss-rate% >> 1324 ? 14% -20.6% 1052 ? 10% perf-stat.overall.instructions-per-iTLB-miss >> 15824784 +19.1% 18853609 ? 4% perf-stat.overall.path-length >> 3.615e+08 ? 3% -16.0% 3.037e+08 ? 5% perf-stat.ps.branch-instructions >> 14134307 ? 36% -36.3% 9007742 ? 32% perf-stat.ps.branch-misses >> 47797365 ? 53% -43.7% 26888329 ? 60% perf-stat.ps.cache-references >> 20207 ? 2% -19.6% 16238 perf-stat.ps.context-switches >> 6.417e+09 ? 15% -25.7% 4.767e+09 ? 9% perf-stat.ps.cpu-cycles >> 634.12 ? 4% -43.7% 357.12 ? 3% perf-stat.ps.cpu-migrations >> 4.484e+08 ? 2% -16.5% 3.746e+08 ? 4% perf-stat.ps.dTLB-loads >> 2.231e+08 -14.0% 1.918e+08 ? 4% perf-stat.ps.dTLB-stores >> 1.761e+09 ? 2% -16.5% 1.47e+09 ? 5% perf-stat.ps.instructions >> 19358 ? 2% -26.0% 14330 ? 2% perf-stat.ps.minor-faults >> 850011 ? 2% -24.2% 644018 ? 4% perf-stat.ps.node-load-misses >> 102630 ? 3% -33.7% 68042 ? 4% perf-stat.ps.node-loads >> 337128 ? 2% -25.6% 250695 ? 5% perf-stat.ps.node-store-misses >> 64423 ? 13% -37.7% 40127 ? 21% perf-stat.ps.node-stores >> 19358 ? 2% -26.0% 14330 ? 2% perf-stat.ps.page-faults >> 6.33e+11 -10.6% 5.656e+11 ? 4% perf-stat.total.instructions >> 100667 -14.7% 85872 softirqs.BLOCK >> 60141 +17.3% 70538 softirqs.CPU0.RCU >> 63937 ? 5% +12.6% 72018 ? 2% softirqs.CPU10.RCU >> 62649 ? 11% +17.6% 73663 ? 2% softirqs.CPU12.RCU >> 62307 ? 4% +13.9% 70968 softirqs.CPU13.RCU >> 62419 ? 5% +13.7% 70983 softirqs.CPU14.RCU >> 60854 +15.2% 70118 ? 3% softirqs.CPU16.RCU >> 62245 ? 3% +13.6% 70738 ? 3% softirqs.CPU17.RCU >> 62187 ? 2% +15.2% 71660 ? 3% softirqs.CPU18.RCU >> 62576 ? 2% +14.1% 71421 ? 3% softirqs.CPU19.RCU >> 63593 ? 5% +14.1% 72579 ? 3% softirqs.CPU2.RCU >> 62793 ? 2% +14.4% 71859 ? 2% softirqs.CPU20.RCU >> 61362 +15.7% 70991 ? 3% softirqs.CPU21.RCU >> 62651 ? 2% +13.4% 71066 ? 4% softirqs.CPU22.RCU >> 62138 ? 3% +14.9% 71384 ? 3% softirqs.CPU23.RCU >> 62643 +13.9% 71337 ? 4% softirqs.CPU24.RCU >> 60674 +16.2% 70500 ? 4% softirqs.CPU25.RCU >> 60125 ? 2% +16.7% 70195 ? 4% softirqs.CPU26.RCU >> 61988 ? 2% +14.5% 70986 ? 3% softirqs.CPU27.RCU >> 62161 ? 2% +14.2% 71010 ? 2% softirqs.CPU29.RCU >> 62196 ? 2% +14.2% 71030 ? 2% softirqs.CPU30.RCU >> 61878 ? 2% +12.2% 69444 ? 4% softirqs.CPU31.RCU >> 63376 ? 4% +11.7% 70774 ? 2% softirqs.CPU33.RCU >> 62797 ? 3% +14.2% 71719 softirqs.CPU36.RCU >> 63162 ? 4% +12.3% 70932 softirqs.CPU39.RCU >> 62956 ? 4% +13.1% 71204 ? 2% softirqs.CPU41.RCU >> 61758 ? 2% +13.6% 70144 softirqs.CPU42.RCU >> 61374 +19.4% 73261 softirqs.CPU48.RCU >> 63016 ? 2% +15.4% 72724 softirqs.CPU49.RCU >> 65073 ? 6% +11.1% 72314 softirqs.CPU5.RCU >> 64069 ? 5% +15.3% 73902 ? 2% softirqs.CPU50.RCU >> 65325 ? 6% +12.2% 73274 softirqs.CPU51.RCU >> 65316 ? 6% +11.5% 72824 ? 2% softirqs.CPU52.RCU >> 64811 ? 6% +13.2% 73390 softirqs.CPU53.RCU >> 64697 ? 6% +13.4% 73341 softirqs.CPU54.RCU >> 64966 ? 5% +14.5% 74379 softirqs.CPU55.RCU >> 65101 ? 5% +14.2% 74361 softirqs.CPU56.RCU >> 65644 ? 6% +13.7% 74637 ? 2% softirqs.CPU57.RCU >> 64201 ? 5% +14.7% 73664 softirqs.CPU58.RCU >> 64557 ? 6% +14.7% 74025 ? 2% softirqs.CPU59.RCU >> 64884 ? 6% +11.7% 72453 softirqs.CPU6.RCU >> 65105 ? 6% +13.7% 74019 softirqs.CPU60.RCU >> 63695 ? 3% +15.8% 73787 softirqs.CPU61.RCU >> 63720 ? 5% +14.9% 73243 ? 2% softirqs.CPU62.RCU >> 64893 ? 5% +14.0% 73992 softirqs.CPU63.RCU >> 61359 ? 2% +17.6% 72168 ? 4% softirqs.CPU64.RCU >> 63378 ? 3% +13.1% 71687 ? 4% softirqs.CPU65.RCU >> 63198 ? 2% +15.4% 72913 ? 3% softirqs.CPU66.RCU >> 62881 ? 2% +16.2% 73041 ? 4% softirqs.CPU67.RCU >> 63601 ? 2% +14.4% 72792 ? 2% softirqs.CPU68.RCU >> 62434 +15.3% 71994 ? 4% softirqs.CPU69.RCU >> 64013 ? 4% +11.6% 71456 softirqs.CPU7.RCU >> 62883 ? 2% +15.2% 72467 ? 4% softirqs.CPU70.RCU >> 62818 ? 2% +15.5% 72584 ? 4% softirqs.CPU71.RCU >> 62226 +15.1% 71598 ? 5% softirqs.CPU72.RCU >> 60714 ? 2% +17.3% 71207 ? 4% softirqs.CPU73.RCU >> 60463 ? 2% +18.4% 71587 ? 5% softirqs.CPU74.RCU >> 62460 +14.9% 71746 ? 3% softirqs.CPU75.RCU >> 62215 ? 2% +16.3% 72328 ? 6% softirqs.CPU76.RCU >> 62743 ? 2% +14.1% 71611 ? 3% softirqs.CPU77.RCU >> 62533 +14.7% 71715 ? 3% softirqs.CPU78.RCU >> 61946 +15.0% 71227 ? 5% softirqs.CPU79.RCU >> 63756 ? 6% +13.6% 72416 ? 2% softirqs.CPU8.RCU >> 64308 ? 4% +13.3% 72856 softirqs.CPU81.RCU >> 63725 ? 3% +14.6% 73053 softirqs.CPU85.RCU >> 64254 ? 4% +13.1% 72670 softirqs.CPU86.RCU >> 63584 ? 4% +14.1% 72546 softirqs.CPU87.RCU >> 61794 ? 8% +17.0% 72310 ? 2% softirqs.CPU9.RCU >> 62085 ? 2% +16.1% 72067 softirqs.CPU90.RCU >> 6086570 ? 3% +13.5% 6907274 softirqs.RCU >> 7.91 ? 31% -4.9 3.00 ? 39% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.new_sync_write.vfs_write.ksys_write.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe >> 7.90 ? 31% -4.9 3.00 ? 39% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.btrfs_file_write_iter.new_sync_write.vfs_write.ksys_write.do_syscall_64 >> 7.91 ? 31% -4.9 3.01 ? 39% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.ksys_write.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe >> 7.91 ? 31% -4.9 3.01 ? 39% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.vfs_write.ksys_write.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe >> 7.45 ? 33% -4.9 2.59 ? 40% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.btrfs_sync_file.btrfs_file_write_iter.new_sync_write.vfs_write.ksys_write >> 6.33 ? 36% -4.4 1.95 ? 40% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.btrfs_log_dentry_safe.btrfs_sync_file.btrfs_file_write_iter.new_sync_write.vfs_write >> 6.32 ? 36% -4.4 1.95 ? 40% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.btrfs_log_inode_parent.btrfs_log_dentry_safe.btrfs_sync_file.btrfs_file_write_iter.new_sync_write >> 5.96 ? 38% -4.3 1.66 ? 47% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.btrfs_log_inode.btrfs_log_inode_parent.btrfs_log_dentry_safe.btrfs_sync_file.btrfs_file_write_iter >> 3.74 ? 38% -2.8 0.95 ? 70% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.btrfs_log_changed_extents.btrfs_log_inode.btrfs_log_inode_parent.btrfs_log_dentry_safe.btrfs_sync_file >> 3.74 ? 38% -2.8 0.95 ? 70% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.log_one_extent.btrfs_log_changed_extents.btrfs_log_inode.btrfs_log_inode_parent.btrfs_log_dentry_safe >> 2.51 ? 39% -1.9 0.56 ?100% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.btrfs_csum_file_blocks.log_one_extent.btrfs_log_changed_extents.btrfs_log_inode.btrfs_log_inode_parent >> 1.64 ? 17% -0.8 0.81 ? 70% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.__x64_sys_exit_group.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe >> 1.64 ? 17% -0.8 0.81 ? 70% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.do_group_exit.__x64_sys_exit_group.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe >> 1.64 ? 17% -0.8 0.81 ? 70% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.do_exit.do_group_exit.__x64_sys_exit_group.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe >> 0.85 ? 25% -0.6 0.28 ?100% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.btrfs_commit_transaction.iterate_supers.ksys_sync.__x64_sys_sync.do_syscall_64 >> 0.66 ? 14% -0.4 0.27 ?100% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.tlb_flush_mmu.tlb_finish_mmu.exit_mmap.mmput.do_exit >> 0.66 ? 14% -0.4 0.27 ?100% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.tlb_finish_mmu.exit_mmap.mmput.do_exit.do_group_exit >> 0.54 ? 4% +0.1 0.66 ? 11% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.hrtimer_next_event_without.tick_nohz_get_sleep_length.menu_select.do_idle.cpu_startup_entry >> 0.96 ? 9% +0.2 1.14 ? 8% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.scheduler_tick.update_process_times.tick_sched_handle.tick_sched_timer.__hrtimer_run_queues >> 1.15 ? 8% +0.2 1.38 ? 3% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.__next_timer_interrupt.get_next_timer_interrupt.tick_nohz_next_event.tick_nohz_get_sleep_length.menu_select >> 0.62 ? 16% +0.3 0.90 ? 4% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.rcu_core.__softirqentry_text_start.irq_exit.smp_apic_timer_interrupt.apic_timer_interrupt >> 0.56 ? 6% +0.3 0.87 ? 29% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.load_balance.rebalance_domains.__softirqentry_text_start.irq_exit.smp_apic_timer_interrupt >> 2.88 ? 3% +0.3 3.22 ? 7% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.tick_sched_handle.tick_sched_timer.__hrtimer_run_queues.hrtimer_interrupt.smp_apic_timer_interrupt >> 1.90 ? 3% +0.3 2.25 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.get_next_timer_interrupt.tick_nohz_next_event.tick_nohz_get_sleep_length.menu_select.do_idle >> 2.70 ? 3% +0.4 3.08 ? 9% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.update_process_times.tick_sched_handle.tick_sched_timer.__hrtimer_run_queues.hrtimer_interrupt >> 0.92 ? 6% +0.6 1.48 ? 16% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.rebalance_domains.__softirqentry_text_start.irq_exit.smp_apic_timer_interrupt.apic_timer_interrupt >> 0.88 ? 41% +0.6 1.48 ? 21% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.tick_nohz_irq_exit.irq_exit.smp_apic_timer_interrupt.apic_timer_interrupt.cpuidle_enter_state >> 3.67 ? 7% +0.7 4.40 ? 7% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.tick_sched_timer.__hrtimer_run_queues.hrtimer_interrupt.smp_apic_timer_interrupt.apic_timer_interrupt >> 2.76 ? 8% +0.8 3.57 ? 4% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.tick_nohz_next_event.tick_nohz_get_sleep_length.menu_select.do_idle.cpu_startup_entry >> 5.82 ? 3% +0.9 6.69 ? 3% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.__hrtimer_run_queues.hrtimer_interrupt.smp_apic_timer_interrupt.apic_timer_interrupt.cpuidle_enter_state >> 3.45 ? 5% +1.0 4.43 ? 2% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.tick_nohz_get_sleep_length.menu_select.do_idle.cpu_startup_entry.start_secondary >> 0.00 +1.1 1.11 ? 35% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.btrfs_create.lookup_open.do_last.path_openat.do_filp_open >> 0.13 ?173% +1.1 1.26 ? 33% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.lookup_open.do_last.path_openat.do_filp_open.do_sys_open >> 3.18 ? 15% +1.2 4.33 ? 12% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.__softirqentry_text_start.irq_exit.smp_apic_timer_interrupt.apic_timer_interrupt.cpuidle_enter_state >> 0.29 ?100% +1.2 1.44 ? 35% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.do_last.path_openat.do_filp_open.do_sys_open.do_syscall_64 >> 0.32 ?100% +1.2 1.52 ? 34% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.path_openat.do_filp_open.do_sys_open.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe >> 0.32 ?100% +1.2 1.52 ? 34% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.do_filp_open.do_sys_open.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe >> 0.33 ?100% +1.2 1.54 ? 34% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.do_sys_open.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe >> 0.00 +1.2 1.24 ? 37% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.btrfs_unlink.vfs_unlink.do_unlinkat.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe >> 0.00 +1.2 1.25 ? 36% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.vfs_unlink.do_unlinkat.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe >> 4.55 ? 18% +1.8 6.38 ? 6% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.irq_exit.smp_apic_timer_interrupt.apic_timer_interrupt.cpuidle_enter_state.cpuidle_enter >> 0.71 ? 11% +1.9 2.66 ? 41% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.do_unlinkat.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe >> 17.20 ? 8% +4.0 21.17 ? 4% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.smp_apic_timer_interrupt.apic_timer_interrupt.cpuidle_enter_state.cpuidle_enter.do_idle >> 20.46 ? 9% +4.6 25.07 ? 5% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.apic_timer_interrupt.cpuidle_enter_state.cpuidle_enter.do_idle.cpu_startup_entry >> 7.95 ? 31% -4.9 3.04 ? 39% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.vfs_write >> 7.95 ? 31% -4.9 3.04 ? 39% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.ksys_write >> 7.93 ? 31% -4.9 3.03 ? 39% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.new_sync_write >> 7.90 ? 31% -4.9 3.00 ? 39% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.btrfs_file_write_iter >> 7.45 ? 33% -4.9 2.59 ? 40% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.btrfs_sync_file >> 6.33 ? 36% -4.4 1.95 ? 40% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.btrfs_log_dentry_safe >> 6.32 ? 36% -4.4 1.95 ? 40% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.btrfs_log_inode_parent >> 5.96 ? 38% -4.3 1.66 ? 47% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.btrfs_log_inode >> 3.74 ? 38% -2.7 1.07 ? 48% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.btrfs_log_changed_extents >> 3.74 ? 38% -2.7 1.07 ? 48% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.log_one_extent >> 2.63 ? 38% -1.8 0.81 ? 49% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.btrfs_csum_file_blocks >> 2.59 ? 28% -1.2 1.37 ? 33% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__btrfs_drop_extents >> 2.34 ? 28% -1.1 1.26 ? 32% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.btrfs_lookup_file_extent >> 1.07 ? 37% -0.7 0.33 ? 52% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.btrfs_lookup_csum >> 1.65 ? 16% -0.7 0.94 ? 44% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.do_exit >> 1.65 ? 16% -0.7 0.94 ? 44% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__x64_sys_exit_group >> 1.65 ? 16% -0.7 0.94 ? 44% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.do_group_exit >> 0.65 ? 29% -0.4 0.21 ? 27% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.btrfs_run_delayed_refs >> 0.65 ? 29% -0.4 0.21 ? 27% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__btrfs_run_delayed_refs >> 0.85 ? 16% -0.4 0.41 ? 34% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.osq_lock >> 0.60 ? 28% -0.4 0.17 ? 29% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.btrfs_run_delayed_refs_for_head >> 0.72 ? 27% -0.4 0.32 ? 37% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.queued_write_lock_slowpath >> 0.89 ? 25% -0.4 0.50 ? 11% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.btrfs_commit_transaction >> 0.84 ? 16% -0.4 0.47 ? 32% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__mutex_lock >> 0.63 ? 45% -0.3 0.28 ? 29% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.queued_read_lock_slowpath >> 0.52 ? 25% -0.3 0.20 ? 45% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.wait_log_commit >> 0.72 ? 15% -0.3 0.41 ? 48% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.tlb_flush_mmu >> 0.72 ? 15% -0.3 0.41 ? 48% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.tlb_finish_mmu >> 0.55 ? 25% -0.3 0.24 ? 35% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.btrfs_sync_log >> 0.67 ? 15% -0.3 0.38 ? 49% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.release_pages >> 0.48 ? 30% -0.3 0.21 ? 63% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.iterate_bdevs >> 0.35 ? 29% -0.3 0.10 ? 30% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__btrfs_free_extent >> 0.87 ? 17% -0.3 0.62 ? 24% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__handle_mm_fault >> 0.90 ? 17% -0.2 0.65 ? 24% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.handle_mm_fault >> 0.27 ? 36% -0.2 0.03 ?100% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.lookup_inline_extent_backref >> 0.39 ? 12% -0.2 0.16 ? 30% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__do_sys_wait4 >> 0.39 ? 12% -0.2 0.16 ? 30% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.kernel_wait4 >> 0.39 ? 11% -0.2 0.15 ? 29% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.do_wait >> 0.43 ? 29% -0.2 0.23 ? 35% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.setup_items_for_insert >> 0.20 ? 24% -0.2 0.03 ?100% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.alloc_reserved_file_extent >> 0.20 ? 54% -0.2 0.05 ?106% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.btrfs_next_old_leaf >> 0.28 ? 29% -0.1 0.14 ? 45% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.btrfs_unlock_up_safe >> 0.30 ? 17% -0.1 0.15 ? 38% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.start_ordered_ops >> 0.22 ? 14% -0.1 0.10 ? 38% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.wait4 >> 0.19 ? 11% -0.1 0.08 ? 27% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.wait_task_zombie >> 0.19 ? 13% -0.1 0.08 ? 27% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.release_task >> 0.23 ? 23% -0.1 0.15 ? 30% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.page_remove_rmap >> 0.30 ? 7% -0.1 0.22 ? 11% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.update_load_avg >> 0.16 ? 22% -0.1 0.09 ? 44% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.copy_page >> 0.28 ? 15% -0.1 0.21 ? 20% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.mmap_region >> 0.11 ? 12% -0.1 0.04 ?106% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.blk_flush_plug_list >> 0.11 ? 13% -0.1 0.04 ?106% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.blk_mq_flush_plug_list >> 0.10 ? 10% -0.1 0.04 ?106% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.blk_finish_plug >> 0.11 ? 10% -0.1 0.04 ?106% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.blk_mq_sched_insert_requests >> 0.13 ? 8% -0.1 0.07 ? 62% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.do_wp_page >> 0.08 ? 19% -0.1 0.03 ?100% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.unlock_page >> 0.11 ? 7% -0.1 0.06 ? 62% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.wp_page_copy >> 0.18 ? 16% -0.0 0.13 ? 11% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.rcu_irq_enter >> 0.09 ? 13% -0.0 0.05 ? 61% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.btrfs_submit_bio_hook >> 0.09 ? 17% -0.0 0.07 ? 23% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__vm_munmap >> 0.12 ? 15% +0.0 0.16 ? 5% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.cpumask_next_and >> 0.10 ? 8% +0.0 0.14 ? 12% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.find_next_and_bit >> 0.04 ? 60% +0.0 0.09 ? 36% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__btrfs_run_delayed_items >> 0.06 ? 62% +0.1 0.13 ? 12% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.tick_check_broadcast_expired >> 0.15 ? 12% +0.1 0.22 ? 5% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.call_cpuidle >> 0.25 ? 9% +0.1 0.33 ? 11% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp._raw_spin_lock_irq >> 0.00 +0.1 0.10 ? 31% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.btrfs_del_dir_entries_in_log >> 0.00 +0.1 0.10 ? 52% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.btrfs_del_inode_ref >> 0.00 +0.1 0.11 ? 48% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.btrfs_del_inode_ref_in_log >> 0.01 ?173% +0.1 0.14 ? 39% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.btrfs_lookup >> 0.01 ?173% +0.1 0.14 ? 39% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.btrfs_lookup_dentry >> 0.56 ? 4% +0.1 0.69 ? 11% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.hrtimer_next_event_without >> 0.34 ? 13% +0.1 0.48 ? 14% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.io_serial_in >> 0.28 ? 17% +0.1 0.43 ? 9% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.note_gp_changes >> 0.79 ? 13% +0.2 0.95 ? 6% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.find_next_bit >> 1.02 ? 11% +0.2 1.19 ? 9% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.scheduler_tick >> 0.84 ? 7% +0.2 1.06 ? 9% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.read_tsc >> 1.30 ? 8% +0.2 1.54 ? 2% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__next_timer_interrupt >> 0.34 ? 28% +0.2 0.59 ? 18% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp._raw_spin_trylock >> 0.10 ? 15% +0.2 0.35 ? 44% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.btrfs_orphan_add >> 0.10 ? 15% +0.2 0.35 ? 44% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.btrfs_insert_orphan_item >> 0.64 ? 16% +0.3 0.92 ? 4% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.rcu_core >> 0.08 ? 14% +0.3 0.36 ? 47% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.btrfs_del_orphan_item >> 0.17 ? 33% +0.3 0.47 ? 37% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.btrfs_insert_dir_item >> 0.16 ? 34% +0.3 0.46 ? 37% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.insert_with_overflow >> 0.18 ? 31% +0.3 0.49 ? 38% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.btrfs_add_link >> 2.97 ? 3% +0.3 3.29 ? 8% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.tick_sched_handle >> 1.93 ? 3% +0.3 2.28 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.get_next_timer_interrupt >> 2.80 ? 4% +0.4 3.17 ? 9% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.update_process_times >> 0.12 ? 29% +0.4 0.56 ? 36% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.btrfs_new_inode >> 0.15 ? 15% +0.5 0.62 ? 33% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.btrfs_lookup_dir_item >> 0.94 ? 7% +0.5 1.49 ? 16% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.rebalance_domains >> 0.24 ? 17% +0.6 0.83 ? 35% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.btrfs_unlink_inode >> 0.24 ? 16% +0.6 0.83 ? 35% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__btrfs_unlink_inode >> 0.90 ? 41% +0.6 1.51 ? 20% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.tick_nohz_irq_exit >> 3.79 ? 8% +0.7 4.49 ? 8% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.tick_sched_timer >> 0.33 ? 32% +0.8 1.11 ? 35% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.btrfs_create >> 2.81 ? 7% +0.8 3.63 ? 4% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.tick_nohz_next_event >> 5.99 ? 3% +0.9 6.85 ? 3% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__hrtimer_run_queues >> 0.37 ? 15% +0.9 1.25 ? 36% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.vfs_unlink >> 0.36 ? 14% +0.9 1.24 ? 37% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.btrfs_unlink >> 0.37 ? 30% +0.9 1.26 ? 33% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.lookup_open >> 0.65 ? 21% +1.0 1.62 ? 33% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.path_openat >> 0.65 ? 21% +1.0 1.62 ? 33% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.do_filp_open >> 3.51 ? 6% +1.0 4.48 ? 2% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.tick_nohz_get_sleep_length >> 0.63 ? 23% +1.0 1.61 ? 33% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.do_sys_open >> 0.51 ? 25% +1.0 1.49 ? 35% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.do_last >> 0.34 ? 7% +1.0 1.35 ? 43% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.evict >> 0.34 ? 8% +1.0 1.35 ? 43% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.btrfs_evict_inode >> 3.50 ? 14% +1.1 4.63 ? 10% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__softirqentry_text_start >> 4.92 ? 16% +1.8 6.73 ? 5% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.irq_exit >> 0.72 ? 11% +1.9 2.66 ? 41% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.do_unlinkat >> 17.65 ? 8% +3.9 21.52 ? 4% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.smp_apic_timer_interrupt >> 19.41 ? 9% +4.2 23.61 ? 4% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.apic_timer_interrupt >> 0.84 ? 16% -0.4 0.41 ? 34% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.osq_lock >> 0.16 ? 22% -0.1 0.09 ? 44% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.copy_page >> 0.08 ? 19% -0.1 0.03 ?100% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.unlock_page >> 0.10 ? 12% -0.0 0.06 ? 28% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.update_load_avg >> 0.04 ? 58% +0.0 0.07 ? 12% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.retint_kernel >> 0.09 ? 8% +0.0 0.13 ? 9% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.find_next_and_bit >> 0.11 ? 7% +0.0 0.16 ? 13% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.sched_clock_cpu >> 0.01 ?173% +0.1 0.08 ? 27% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.run_timer_softirq >> 0.15 ? 12% +0.1 0.21 ? 6% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.call_cpuidle >> 0.17 ? 20% +0.1 0.24 ? 11% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.rcu_idle_exit >> 0.06 ? 62% +0.1 0.12 ? 13% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.tick_check_broadcast_expired >> 0.24 ? 10% +0.1 0.32 ? 12% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp._raw_spin_lock_irq >> 0.15 ? 23% +0.1 0.25 ? 14% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.note_gp_changes >> 0.18 ? 14% +0.1 0.28 ? 14% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.tsc_verify_tsc_adjust >> 0.63 ? 4% +0.1 0.73 ? 7% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.__next_timer_interrupt >> 0.54 ? 14% +0.1 0.67 ? 8% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp._raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore >> 0.34 ? 13% +0.1 0.48 ? 14% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.io_serial_in >> 0.33 ? 21% +0.1 0.48 ? 12% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.__softirqentry_text_start >> 0.52 ? 12% +0.2 0.69 ? 4% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.do_idle >> 0.81 ? 7% +0.2 1.04 ? 9% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.read_tsc >> 0.34 ? 28% +0.2 0.58 ? 18% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp._raw_spin_trylock >> 2.17 ? 4% +0.3 2.47 ? 5% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.cpuidle_enter_state >> 201960 -14.9% 171842 interrupts.316:PCI-MSI.376832-edge.ahci[0000:00:17.0] >> 308.00 ? 5% +17.7% 362.50 ? 8% interrupts.35:PCI-MSI.31981568-edge.i40e-0000:3d:00.0:misc >> 151734 -13.9% 130662 ? 3% interrupts.CAL:Function_call_interrupts >> 114.25 ? 11% -32.6% 77.00 ? 26% interrupts.CPU0.TLB:TLB_shootdowns >> 584.00 -10.5% 522.75 ? 2% interrupts.CPU1.CAL:Function_call_interrupts >> 343.25 ? 22% -41.1% 202.25 ? 41% interrupts.CPU1.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts >> 343.25 ? 22% -41.1% 202.25 ? 41% interrupts.CPU1.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts >> 147.00 ? 7% -42.3% 84.75 ? 18% interrupts.CPU1.TLB:TLB_shootdowns >> 325.25 ? 13% -50.0% 162.75 ? 37% interrupts.CPU10.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts >> 325.25 ? 13% -50.0% 162.75 ? 37% interrupts.CPU10.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts >> 528.75 ? 6% -15.4% 447.25 ? 2% interrupts.CPU10.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts >> 145.50 ? 10% -37.1% 91.50 ? 19% interrupts.CPU10.TLB:TLB_shootdowns >> 590.75 ? 6% -11.0% 525.50 ? 2% interrupts.CPU11.CAL:Function_call_interrupts >> 344.00 ? 17% -44.7% 190.25 ? 27% interrupts.CPU11.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts >> 344.00 ? 17% -44.7% 190.25 ? 27% interrupts.CPU11.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts >> 548.00 ? 7% -30.6% 380.50 ? 7% interrupts.CPU11.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts >> 153.25 ? 21% -42.9% 87.50 ? 10% interrupts.CPU11.TLB:TLB_shootdowns >> 577.00 -9.7% 521.25 interrupts.CPU12.CAL:Function_call_interrupts >> 305.25 ? 28% -44.3% 170.00 ? 33% interrupts.CPU12.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts >> 305.25 ? 28% -44.3% 170.00 ? 33% interrupts.CPU12.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts >> 524.75 ? 8% -14.8% 447.25 ? 6% interrupts.CPU12.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts >> 139.50 ? 4% -38.7% 85.50 ? 6% interrupts.CPU12.TLB:TLB_shootdowns >> 601.25 ? 4% -11.2% 534.00 ? 4% interrupts.CPU13.CAL:Function_call_interrupts >> 351.50 ? 17% -46.9% 186.50 ? 29% interrupts.CPU13.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts >> 351.50 ? 17% -46.9% 186.50 ? 29% interrupts.CPU13.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts >> 545.75 ? 6% -22.7% 422.00 ? 12% interrupts.CPU13.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts >> 164.50 ? 18% -41.6% 96.00 ? 20% interrupts.CPU13.TLB:TLB_shootdowns >> 578.00 ? 2% -11.2% 513.00 interrupts.CPU14.CAL:Function_call_interrupts >> 339.00 ? 20% -41.7% 197.50 ? 26% interrupts.CPU14.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts >> 339.00 ? 20% -41.7% 197.50 ? 26% interrupts.CPU14.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts >> 146.00 ? 7% -48.6% 75.00 ? 15% interrupts.CPU14.TLB:TLB_shootdowns >> 542.50 ? 9% -19.0% 439.25 interrupts.CPU15.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts >> 147.75 ? 13% -37.4% 92.50 ? 25% interrupts.CPU15.TLB:TLB_shootdowns >> 139.00 ? 16% -40.3% 83.00 ? 17% interrupts.CPU16.TLB:TLB_shootdowns >> 605.50 ? 2% -15.1% 514.25 ? 6% interrupts.CPU17.CAL:Function_call_interrupts >> 168.00 ? 8% -54.6% 76.25 ? 39% interrupts.CPU17.TLB:TLB_shootdowns >> 573.25 ? 4% -8.0% 527.50 ? 2% interrupts.CPU2.CAL:Function_call_interrupts >> 339.00 ? 14% -39.3% 205.75 ? 44% interrupts.CPU2.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts >> 339.00 ? 14% -39.3% 205.75 ? 44% interrupts.CPU2.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts >> 875.50 ? 4% -24.9% 657.50 ? 3% interrupts.CPU20.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts >> 846.25 ? 6% -26.6% 621.00 ? 6% interrupts.CPU21.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts >> 811.00 ? 7% -22.9% 625.25 ? 6% interrupts.CPU22.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts >> 775.50 ? 8% -22.3% 602.50 ? 5% interrupts.CPU23.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts >> 115.75 ? 4% -42.5% 66.50 ? 24% interrupts.CPU23.TLB:TLB_shootdowns >> 2534 ? 5% -12.3% 2223 ? 10% interrupts.CPU24.CAL:Function_call_interrupts >> 691.00 ? 6% -14.8% 588.75 ? 8% interrupts.CPU24.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts >> 118.00 ? 13% -45.8% 64.00 ? 4% interrupts.CPU24.TLB:TLB_shootdowns >> 691.00 ? 5% -27.6% 500.50 ? 8% interrupts.CPU25.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts >> 2729 ? 4% -16.3% 2286 ? 6% interrupts.CPU26.CAL:Function_call_interrupts >> 692.25 ? 7% -25.3% 517.00 ? 6% interrupts.CPU26.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts >> 121.50 ? 8% -42.6% 69.75 ? 5% interrupts.CPU26.TLB:TLB_shootdowns >> 2606 ? 4% -12.5% 2280 ? 3% interrupts.CPU27.CAL:Function_call_interrupts >> 701.50 ? 7% -21.9% 547.75 ? 10% interrupts.CPU27.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts >> 146.75 ? 10% -44.8% 81.00 ? 24% interrupts.CPU27.TLB:TLB_shootdowns >> 2570 ? 2% -13.3% 2229 ? 7% interrupts.CPU28.CAL:Function_call_interrupts >> 672.50 ? 6% -22.2% 523.50 ? 4% interrupts.CPU28.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts >> 118.00 ? 7% -40.9% 69.75 ? 13% interrupts.CPU28.TLB:TLB_shootdowns >> 2675 ? 5% -14.8% 2280 ? 7% interrupts.CPU29.CAL:Function_call_interrupts >> 130.00 ? 16% -46.2% 70.00 ? 21% interrupts.CPU29.TLB:TLB_shootdowns >> 594.00 ? 3% -12.8% 518.00 ? 3% interrupts.CPU3.CAL:Function_call_interrupts >> 156.50 ? 17% -48.9% 80.00 ? 18% interrupts.CPU3.TLB:TLB_shootdowns >> 2632 ? 2% -13.1% 2288 ? 5% interrupts.CPU30.CAL:Function_call_interrupts >> 676.00 ? 14% -27.2% 492.00 ? 5% interrupts.CPU30.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts >> 140.50 ? 20% -48.6% 72.25 ? 15% interrupts.CPU30.TLB:TLB_shootdowns >> 650.00 ? 8% -23.9% 494.50 ? 9% interrupts.CPU31.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts >> 121.50 ? 13% -36.4% 77.25 ? 15% interrupts.CPU31.TLB:TLB_shootdowns >> 2542 ? 3% -11.9% 2240 ? 3% interrupts.CPU32.CAL:Function_call_interrupts >> 673.25 ? 9% -19.1% 544.50 ? 16% interrupts.CPU32.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts >> 119.25 ? 18% -42.8% 68.25 ? 6% interrupts.CPU32.TLB:TLB_shootdowns >> 2539 ? 6% -15.3% 2151 ? 6% interrupts.CPU33.CAL:Function_call_interrupts >> 693.50 ? 4% -25.3% 518.25 ? 12% interrupts.CPU33.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts >> 125.50 ? 4% -42.6% 72.00 ? 17% interrupts.CPU33.TLB:TLB_shootdowns >> 2512 ? 3% -9.6% 2272 ? 5% interrupts.CPU34.CAL:Function_call_interrupts >> 673.75 ? 6% -24.7% 507.50 ? 9% interrupts.CPU34.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts >> 124.25 ? 12% -38.2% 76.75 ? 21% interrupts.CPU34.TLB:TLB_shootdowns >> 2531 ? 3% -13.8% 2181 ? 4% interrupts.CPU35.CAL:Function_call_interrupts >> 678.75 ? 8% -25.0% 508.75 ? 6% interrupts.CPU35.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts >> 113.50 ? 8% -34.8% 74.00 ? 10% interrupts.CPU35.TLB:TLB_shootdowns >> 2512 ? 3% -13.0% 2185 ? 4% interrupts.CPU36.CAL:Function_call_interrupts >> 655.25 ? 6% -18.3% 535.25 ? 9% interrupts.CPU36.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts >> 150.50 ? 12% -54.3% 68.75 ? 13% interrupts.CPU36.TLB:TLB_shootdowns >> 2614 ? 5% -11.7% 2308 ? 4% interrupts.CPU37.CAL:Function_call_interrupts >> 666.50 ? 9% -16.7% 555.25 ? 6% interrupts.CPU37.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts >> 124.00 ? 14% -41.5% 72.50 ? 16% interrupts.CPU37.TLB:TLB_shootdowns >> 2610 ? 5% -14.8% 2223 ? 7% interrupts.CPU38.CAL:Function_call_interrupts >> 343.75 ? 16% -25.6% 255.75 ? 10% interrupts.CPU38.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts >> 343.75 ? 16% -25.6% 255.75 ? 10% interrupts.CPU38.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts >> 644.50 ? 6% -15.5% 544.50 ? 10% interrupts.CPU38.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts >> 600.75 ? 8% -19.9% 481.00 ? 13% interrupts.CPU39.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts >> 130.50 ? 13% -37.7% 81.25 ? 22% interrupts.CPU39.TLB:TLB_shootdowns >> 346.00 ? 18% -41.8% 201.50 ? 37% interrupts.CPU4.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts >> 346.00 ? 18% -41.8% 201.50 ? 37% interrupts.CPU4.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts >> 553.75 ? 2% -16.8% 460.50 ? 6% interrupts.CPU4.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts >> 147.50 ? 11% -30.2% 103.00 ? 12% interrupts.CPU4.TLB:TLB_shootdowns >> 2573 ? 4% -10.3% 2306 ? 4% interrupts.CPU40.CAL:Function_call_interrupts >> 350.00 ? 14% -20.7% 277.50 ? 16% interrupts.CPU40.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts >> 350.00 ? 14% -20.7% 277.50 ? 16% interrupts.CPU40.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts >> 672.75 ? 6% -16.2% 563.50 ? 7% interrupts.CPU40.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts >> 152.00 ? 8% -47.0% 80.50 ? 18% interrupts.CPU40.TLB:TLB_shootdowns >> 122.25 ? 15% -41.9% 71.00 ? 15% interrupts.CPU41.TLB:TLB_shootdowns >> 688.75 ? 6% -18.8% 559.00 ? 10% interrupts.CPU42.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts >> 115.50 ? 16% -34.4% 75.75 ? 19% interrupts.CPU42.TLB:TLB_shootdowns >> 2744 ? 7% -15.5% 2318 ? 7% interrupts.CPU43.CAL:Function_call_interrupts >> 689.50 ? 7% -17.2% 570.75 ? 10% interrupts.CPU43.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts >> 133.50 ? 14% -46.4% 71.50 ? 10% interrupts.CPU43.TLB:TLB_shootdowns >> 678.75 ? 5% -17.6% 559.50 ? 9% interrupts.CPU44.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts >> 124.00 ? 9% -39.7% 74.75 ? 7% interrupts.CPU44.TLB:TLB_shootdowns >> 2729 ? 3% -16.7% 2272 ? 6% interrupts.CPU45.CAL:Function_call_interrupts >> 666.50 ? 7% -24.0% 506.25 ? 5% interrupts.CPU45.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts >> 132.25 ? 19% -31.8% 90.25 ? 14% interrupts.CPU45.TLB:TLB_shootdowns >> 2609 ? 8% -16.9% 2167 ? 5% interrupts.CPU46.CAL:Function_call_interrupts >> 641.50 ? 6% -14.3% 549.50 ? 5% interrupts.CPU46.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts >> 137.50 ? 15% -37.8% 85.50 ? 13% interrupts.CPU46.TLB:TLB_shootdowns >> 2603 ? 5% -16.3% 2178 ? 7% interrupts.CPU47.CAL:Function_call_interrupts >> 687.00 ? 7% -24.1% 521.75 ? 8% interrupts.CPU47.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts >> 146.25 ? 7% -40.2% 87.50 ? 23% interrupts.CPU47.TLB:TLB_shootdowns >> 396.75 ? 11% -26.7% 290.75 ? 11% interrupts.CPU48.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts >> 396.75 ? 11% -26.7% 290.75 ? 11% interrupts.CPU48.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts >> 772.75 ? 7% -23.2% 593.50 ? 10% interrupts.CPU48.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts >> 111.25 ? 20% -39.3% 67.50 ? 20% interrupts.CPU48.TLB:TLB_shootdowns >> 563.00 -10.7% 502.75 ? 2% interrupts.CPU49.CAL:Function_call_interrupts >> 375.00 ? 19% -28.1% 269.50 ? 12% interrupts.CPU49.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts >> 375.00 ? 19% -28.1% 269.50 ? 12% interrupts.CPU49.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts >> 711.00 ? 6% -24.3% 538.25 ? 11% interrupts.CPU49.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts >> 125.75 ? 10% -48.3% 65.00 ? 17% interrupts.CPU49.TLB:TLB_shootdowns >> 367.50 ? 17% -44.3% 204.75 ? 44% interrupts.CPU5.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts >> 367.50 ? 17% -44.3% 204.75 ? 44% interrupts.CPU5.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts >> 723.75 ? 50% -37.2% 454.75 ? 8% interrupts.CPU5.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts >> 141.25 ? 9% -37.2% 88.75 ? 2% interrupts.CPU5.TLB:TLB_shootdowns >> 547.00 ? 3% -8.4% 501.00 interrupts.CPU50.CAL:Function_call_interrupts >> 362.00 ? 16% -26.5% 266.25 ? 16% interrupts.CPU50.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts >> 362.00 ? 16% -26.5% 266.25 ? 16% interrupts.CPU50.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts >> 699.25 ? 5% -18.6% 569.00 ? 4% interrupts.CPU50.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts >> 109.50 ? 23% -40.9% 64.75 ? 12% interrupts.CPU50.TLB:TLB_shootdowns >> 363.50 ? 14% -26.3% 268.00 ? 16% interrupts.CPU51.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts >> 363.50 ? 14% -26.3% 268.00 ? 16% interrupts.CPU51.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts >> 707.25 ? 4% -18.7% 574.75 ? 4% interrupts.CPU51.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts >> 120.00 ? 13% -33.3% 80.00 ? 22% interrupts.CPU51.TLB:TLB_shootdowns >> 352.75 ? 20% -35.9% 226.25 ? 17% interrupts.CPU52.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts >> 352.75 ? 20% -35.9% 226.25 ? 17% interrupts.CPU52.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts >> 372.50 ? 14% -26.2% 275.00 ? 17% interrupts.CPU53.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts >> 372.50 ? 14% -26.2% 275.00 ? 17% interrupts.CPU53.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts >> 646.25 ? 3% -17.9% 530.25 ? 7% interrupts.CPU53.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts >> 126.25 ? 2% -40.6% 75.00 ? 17% interrupts.CPU53.TLB:TLB_shootdowns >> 623.75 ? 6% -14.4% 534.00 ? 3% interrupts.CPU54.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts >> 128.50 ? 14% -34.8% 83.75 ? 32% interrupts.CPU54.TLB:TLB_shootdowns >> 566.75 -11.2% 503.00 interrupts.CPU55.CAL:Function_call_interrupts >> 350.00 ? 14% -22.5% 271.25 ? 7% interrupts.CPU55.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts >> 350.00 ? 14% -22.5% 271.25 ? 7% interrupts.CPU55.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts >> 614.00 ? 3% -20.9% 485.75 ? 7% interrupts.CPU55.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts >> 129.25 ? 8% -49.1% 65.75 ? 17% interrupts.CPU55.TLB:TLB_shootdowns >> 587.50 ? 3% -12.9% 511.75 ? 3% interrupts.CPU56.CAL:Function_call_interrupts >> 369.50 ? 18% -28.8% 263.00 ? 9% interrupts.CPU56.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts >> 369.50 ? 18% -28.8% 263.00 ? 9% interrupts.CPU56.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts >> 623.50 ? 4% -21.6% 488.75 ? 8% interrupts.CPU56.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts >> 167.00 ? 23% -55.2% 74.75 ? 20% interrupts.CPU56.TLB:TLB_shootdowns >> 350.25 ? 14% -21.5% 275.00 ? 13% interrupts.CPU57.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts >> 350.25 ? 14% -21.5% 275.00 ? 13% interrupts.CPU57.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts >> 647.00 ? 7% -28.9% 459.75 ? 4% interrupts.CPU57.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts >> 142.75 ? 17% -31.2% 98.25 ? 13% interrupts.CPU57.TLB:TLB_shootdowns >> 570.25 ? 2% -10.6% 509.75 ? 3% interrupts.CPU58.CAL:Function_call_interrupts >> 334.00 ? 13% -25.4% 249.25 ? 17% interrupts.CPU58.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts >> 334.00 ? 13% -25.4% 249.25 ? 17% interrupts.CPU58.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts >> 606.75 ? 7% -21.5% 476.00 ? 7% interrupts.CPU58.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts >> 132.75 ? 13% -45.8% 72.00 ? 19% interrupts.CPU58.TLB:TLB_shootdowns >> 583.75 -9.9% 526.25 ? 3% interrupts.CPU59.CAL:Function_call_interrupts >> 354.00 ? 16% -27.3% 257.50 ? 19% interrupts.CPU59.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts >> 354.00 ? 16% -27.3% 257.50 ? 19% interrupts.CPU59.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts >> 622.25 ? 5% -20.3% 495.75 ? 4% interrupts.CPU59.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts >> 146.25 ? 8% -39.7% 88.25 ? 17% interrupts.CPU59.TLB:TLB_shootdowns >> 584.00 -10.3% 523.75 interrupts.CPU6.CAL:Function_call_interrupts >> 352.00 ? 21% -35.1% 228.50 ? 50% interrupts.CPU6.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts >> 352.00 ? 21% -35.1% 228.50 ? 50% interrupts.CPU6.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts >> 146.50 ? 6% -41.3% 86.00 ? 14% interrupts.CPU6.TLB:TLB_shootdowns >> 594.50 ? 2% -14.6% 507.50 interrupts.CPU60.CAL:Function_call_interrupts >> 615.00 ? 7% -25.5% 458.25 ? 6% interrupts.CPU60.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts >> 158.25 ? 11% -52.8% 74.75 ? 10% interrupts.CPU60.TLB:TLB_shootdowns >> 589.75 ? 2% -11.0% 525.00 ? 2% interrupts.CPU61.CAL:Function_call_interrupts >> 609.75 ? 8% -20.9% 482.25 ? 6% interrupts.CPU61.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts >> 152.25 ? 11% -42.9% 87.00 ? 12% interrupts.CPU61.TLB:TLB_shootdowns >> 577.50 ? 2% -10.4% 517.50 ? 2% interrupts.CPU62.CAL:Function_call_interrupts >> 605.75 -23.7% 462.25 ? 7% interrupts.CPU62.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts >> 140.00 ? 13% -40.7% 83.00 ? 20% interrupts.CPU62.TLB:TLB_shootdowns >> 576.25 ? 2% -9.1% 523.75 interrupts.CPU63.CAL:Function_call_interrupts >> 575.00 ? 3% -24.8% 432.50 ? 9% interrupts.CPU63.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts >> 141.50 ? 16% -39.4% 85.75 ? 9% interrupts.CPU63.TLB:TLB_shootdowns >> 562.25 ? 3% -7.6% 519.25 interrupts.CPU64.CAL:Function_call_interrupts >> 347.75 ? 12% -23.7% 265.50 ? 10% interrupts.CPU64.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts >> 347.75 ? 12% -23.7% 265.50 ? 10% interrupts.CPU64.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts >> 572.25 ? 4% -27.0% 418.00 ? 7% interrupts.CPU64.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts >> 124.75 ? 18% -34.9% 81.25 ? 14% interrupts.CPU64.TLB:TLB_shootdowns >> 580.25 ? 4% -13.4% 502.75 ? 5% interrupts.CPU65.CAL:Function_call_interrupts >> 368.75 ? 14% -21.3% 290.25 ? 13% interrupts.CPU65.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts >> 368.75 ? 14% -21.3% 290.25 ? 13% interrupts.CPU65.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts >> 588.00 ? 3% -25.0% 440.75 ? 9% interrupts.CPU65.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts >> 142.75 ? 18% -56.2% 62.50 ? 38% interrupts.CPU65.TLB:TLB_shootdowns >> 528.75 ? 7% -19.7% 424.50 ? 7% interrupts.CPU66.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts >> 385.50 ? 8% -23.2% 296.00 ? 18% interrupts.CPU67.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts >> 385.50 ? 8% -23.2% 296.00 ? 18% interrupts.CPU67.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts >> 551.50 ? 7% -21.7% 432.00 ? 7% interrupts.CPU67.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts >> 380.25 ? 14% -28.5% 272.00 ? 17% interrupts.CPU68.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts >> 380.25 ? 14% -28.5% 272.00 ? 17% interrupts.CPU68.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts >> 581.75 ? 2% -25.1% 435.50 ? 8% interrupts.CPU68.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts >> 113.00 ? 13% -20.4% 90.00 ? 14% interrupts.CPU68.TLB:TLB_shootdowns >> 119.00 ? 9% -39.5% 72.00 ? 13% interrupts.CPU69.TLB:TLB_shootdowns >> 308.00 ? 5% +17.7% 362.50 ? 8% interrupts.CPU7.35:PCI-MSI.31981568-edge.i40e-0000:3d:00.0:misc >> 345.50 ? 19% -48.5% 178.00 ? 44% interrupts.CPU7.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts >> 345.50 ? 19% -48.5% 178.00 ? 44% interrupts.CPU7.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts >> 132.75 ? 14% -35.0% 86.25 ? 13% interrupts.CPU7.TLB:TLB_shootdowns >> 570.50 ? 2% -9.3% 517.25 ? 3% interrupts.CPU70.CAL:Function_call_interrupts >> 371.75 ? 19% -25.4% 277.50 ? 21% interrupts.CPU70.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts >> 371.75 ? 19% -25.4% 277.50 ? 21% interrupts.CPU70.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts >> 541.00 ? 4% -25.6% 402.25 ? 7% interrupts.CPU70.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts >> 133.00 ? 9% -44.7% 73.50 ? 11% interrupts.CPU70.TLB:TLB_shootdowns >> 581.50 ? 3% -9.1% 528.50 ? 3% interrupts.CPU71.CAL:Function_call_interrupts >> 377.50 ? 18% -33.7% 250.25 ? 15% interrupts.CPU71.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts >> 377.50 ? 18% -33.7% 250.25 ? 15% interrupts.CPU71.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts >> 536.25 -23.3% 411.25 ? 9% interrupts.CPU71.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts >> 161.75 ? 25% -47.4% 85.00 ? 12% interrupts.CPU71.TLB:TLB_shootdowns >> 2648 ? 6% -22.7% 2047 ? 3% interrupts.CPU72.CAL:Function_call_interrupts >> 681.50 ? 6% -26.4% 501.25 ? 3% interrupts.CPU72.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts >> 130.75 ? 10% -42.8% 74.75 ? 8% interrupts.CPU72.TLB:TLB_shootdowns >> 2619 ? 6% -21.7% 2049 ? 8% interrupts.CPU73.CAL:Function_call_interrupts >> 378.75 ? 14% -29.8% 266.00 ? 17% interrupts.CPU73.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts >> 378.75 ? 14% -29.8% 266.00 ? 17% interrupts.CPU73.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts >> 660.50 ? 11% -31.3% 453.50 ? 12% interrupts.CPU73.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts >> 693.25 ? 7% -30.8% 480.00 ? 6% interrupts.CPU74.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts >> 130.50 ? 15% -40.4% 77.75 ? 12% interrupts.CPU74.TLB:TLB_shootdowns >> 2696 ? 3% -23.8% 2055 interrupts.CPU75.CAL:Function_call_interrupts >> 709.75 ? 3% -26.2% 523.50 ? 10% interrupts.CPU75.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts >> 132.25 ? 15% -40.3% 79.00 ? 24% interrupts.CPU75.TLB:TLB_shootdowns >> 2720 ? 7% -22.2% 2117 ? 8% interrupts.CPU76.CAL:Function_call_interrupts >> 684.00 ? 8% -28.4% 489.50 ? 6% interrupts.CPU76.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts >> 133.75 ? 7% -47.3% 70.50 ? 12% interrupts.CPU76.TLB:TLB_shootdowns >> 2605 -20.7% 2065 ? 5% interrupts.CPU77.CAL:Function_call_interrupts >> 699.25 ? 6% -25.3% 522.50 ? 16% interrupts.CPU77.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts >> 118.25 ? 5% -36.2% 75.50 ? 9% interrupts.CPU77.TLB:TLB_shootdowns >> 2747 ? 7% -23.9% 2089 ? 6% interrupts.CPU78.CAL:Function_call_interrupts >> 657.25 ? 11% -22.8% 507.25 ? 17% interrupts.CPU78.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts >> 131.00 ? 4% -42.7% 75.00 ? 14% interrupts.CPU78.TLB:TLB_shootdowns >> 2666 ? 5% -16.0% 2239 ? 10% interrupts.CPU79.CAL:Function_call_interrupts >> 693.00 ? 11% -26.2% 511.75 ? 11% interrupts.CPU79.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts >> 146.50 ? 18% -48.5% 75.50 ? 13% interrupts.CPU79.TLB:TLB_shootdowns >> 589.25 ? 2% -10.2% 529.00 interrupts.CPU8.CAL:Function_call_interrupts >> 342.75 ? 20% -52.7% 162.00 ? 35% interrupts.CPU8.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts >> 342.75 ? 20% -52.7% 162.00 ? 35% interrupts.CPU8.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts >> 152.50 ? 9% -40.2% 91.25 ? 13% interrupts.CPU8.TLB:TLB_shootdowns >> 651.25 ? 6% -27.8% 470.50 ? 13% interrupts.CPU80.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts >> 149.25 ? 9% -55.6% 66.25 ? 17% interrupts.CPU80.TLB:TLB_shootdowns >> 644.25 ? 7% -25.1% 482.75 ? 10% interrupts.CPU81.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts >> 135.00 ? 13% -38.7% 82.75 ? 15% interrupts.CPU81.TLB:TLB_shootdowns >> 2656 ? 3% -11.4% 2352 ? 8% interrupts.CPU82.CAL:Function_call_interrupts >> 669.00 ? 11% -24.7% 504.00 ? 11% interrupts.CPU82.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts >> 144.50 ? 17% -41.9% 84.00 ? 18% interrupts.CPU82.TLB:TLB_shootdowns >> 2587 ? 5% -19.8% 2074 ? 7% interrupts.CPU83.CAL:Function_call_interrupts >> 687.25 ? 9% -29.2% 486.25 ? 8% interrupts.CPU83.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts >> 126.75 ? 13% -48.5% 65.25 ? 10% interrupts.CPU83.TLB:TLB_shootdowns >> 2607 ? 5% -17.5% 2152 ? 7% interrupts.CPU84.CAL:Function_call_interrupts >> 133.25 ? 7% -42.2% 77.00 ? 27% interrupts.CPU84.TLB:TLB_shootdowns >> 2506 ? 5% -12.7% 2187 ? 3% interrupts.CPU85.CAL:Function_call_interrupts >> 667.25 ? 10% -29.7% 469.25 ? 11% interrupts.CPU85.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts >> 148.50 ? 7% -47.3% 78.25 ? 16% interrupts.CPU85.TLB:TLB_shootdowns >> 2691 ? 2% -18.0% 2208 ? 9% interrupts.CPU86.CAL:Function_call_interrupts >> 638.75 ? 2% -22.9% 492.25 ? 10% interrupts.CPU86.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts >> 132.75 ? 16% -46.3% 71.25 ? 15% interrupts.CPU86.TLB:TLB_shootdowns >> 2581 ? 4% -13.9% 2223 ? 5% interrupts.CPU87.CAL:Function_call_interrupts >> 339.25 ? 15% -18.3% 277.00 ? 8% interrupts.CPU87.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts >> 339.25 ? 15% -18.3% 277.00 ? 8% interrupts.CPU87.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts >> 659.50 ? 10% -29.3% 466.00 ? 7% interrupts.CPU87.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts >> 139.75 ? 10% -47.2% 73.75 ? 14% interrupts.CPU87.TLB:TLB_shootdowns >> 2689 ? 5% -18.2% 2198 ? 9% interrupts.CPU88.CAL:Function_call_interrupts >> 642.75 ? 8% -19.1% 520.25 ? 8% interrupts.CPU88.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts >> 143.50 ? 6% -44.1% 80.25 ? 16% interrupts.CPU88.TLB:TLB_shootdowns >> 2794 ? 5% -23.9% 2126 ? 2% interrupts.CPU89.CAL:Function_call_interrupts >> 361.00 ? 19% -22.3% 280.50 ? 9% interrupts.CPU89.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts >> 361.00 ? 19% -22.3% 280.50 ? 9% interrupts.CPU89.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts >> 695.00 ? 7% -22.7% 537.00 ? 7% interrupts.CPU89.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts >> 128.25 ? 13% -37.6% 80.00 ? 12% interrupts.CPU89.TLB:TLB_shootdowns >> 577.75 ? 2% -9.1% 525.25 interrupts.CPU9.CAL:Function_call_interrupts >> 338.75 ? 18% -50.9% 166.25 ? 39% interrupts.CPU9.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts >> 338.75 ? 18% -50.9% 166.25 ? 39% interrupts.CPU9.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts >> 535.25 ? 9% -19.0% 433.75 ? 11% interrupts.CPU9.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts >> 140.25 ? 10% -37.8% 87.25 ? 12% interrupts.CPU9.TLB:TLB_shootdowns >> 351.25 ? 17% -20.8% 278.25 ? 5% interrupts.CPU90.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts >> 351.25 ? 17% -20.8% 278.25 ? 5% interrupts.CPU90.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts >> 840.25 ? 43% -41.0% 495.75 ? 12% interrupts.CPU90.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts >> 129.00 ? 20% -43.4% 73.00 ? 28% interrupts.CPU90.TLB:TLB_shootdowns >> 653.00 ? 6% -23.0% 502.75 ? 11% interrupts.CPU91.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts >> 125.75 ? 3% -40.0% 75.50 ? 12% interrupts.CPU91.TLB:TLB_shootdowns >> 2613 -20.3% 2082 ? 2% interrupts.CPU92.CAL:Function_call_interrupts >> 661.50 ? 10% -28.4% 473.50 ? 9% interrupts.CPU92.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts >> 140.50 ? 9% -40.2% 84.00 ? 20% interrupts.CPU92.TLB:TLB_shootdowns >> 2555 ? 4% -15.7% 2155 ? 6% interrupts.CPU93.CAL:Function_call_interrupts >> 639.50 ? 7% -21.4% 502.75 ? 7% interrupts.CPU93.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts >> 122.25 ? 7% -33.3% 81.50 ? 16% interrupts.CPU93.TLB:TLB_shootdowns >> 2624 -17.8% 2156 ? 7% interrupts.CPU94.CAL:Function_call_interrupts >> 669.00 ? 7% -22.3% 520.00 ? 13% interrupts.CPU94.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts >> 154.25 ? 13% -52.7% 73.00 ? 6% interrupts.CPU94.TLB:TLB_shootdowns >> 2581 ? 6% -19.7% 2072 ? 7% interrupts.CPU95.CAL:Function_call_interrupts >> 692.75 ? 12% -29.7% 487.25 ? 8% interrupts.CPU95.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts >> 31535 ? 19% -23.8% 24025 ? 9% interrupts.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts >> 31535 ? 19% -23.8% 24025 ? 9% interrupts.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts >> 64652 ? 4% -22.0% 50444 interrupts.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts >> 12540 ? 5% -39.8% 7554 ? 9% interrupts.TLB:TLB_shootdowns >> >> >> >> reaim.time.minor_page_faults >> >> 6.4e+06 +-----------------------------------------------------------------+ >> |.+..+.+.+. .+.+.+.+..+.+.+.. .+. .+..+.+.+..+. .+.+. .+.. | >> 6.2e+06 |-+ +. + + +.+.+. + + | >> 6e+06 |-+ | >> | | >> 5.8e+06 |-+ | >> 5.6e+06 |-+ | >> | | >> 5.4e+06 |-+ | >> 5.2e+06 |-+ | >> | | >> 5e+06 |-+ | >> 4.8e+06 |-+ | >> | O O O O O O O O O | >> 4.6e+06 +-----------------------------------------------------------------+ >> >> >> reaim.time.voluntary_context_switches >> >> 2.3e+06 +----------------------------------------------------------------+ >> | .+.+. .+.+..+. + + +.+.. .+. .+.+. + | >> 2.25e+06 |.+.+..+ +.. .+ +.+ + + +.+. +.+..+ | >> | + | >> 2.2e+06 |-+ | >> 2.15e+06 |-+ | >> | | >> 2.1e+06 |-+ | >> | | >> 2.05e+06 |-+ | >> 2e+06 |-+ O O O O O O | >> | O O O O O O O O O O | >> 1.95e+06 |-O O O O O O O O | >> | O O O O | >> 1.9e+06 +----------------------------------------------------------------+ >> >> >> reaim.time.involuntary_context_switches >> >> 66000 +-------------------------------------------------------------------+ >> | | >> 64000 |-+ .+.+.. .+..+.+. .+. +.. .+. .+ | >> |.+..+ +.+ +..+. .+..+.+..+ +..+. + +.+.+..+ +. | >> 62000 |-+ + + | >> | | >> 60000 |-+ | >> | | >> 58000 |-+ | >> | O O O O O O | >> 56000 |-+ O O O O | >> | O O O O O | >> 54000 |-+ O O O O O O O O O O O O O | >> | | >> 52000 +-------------------------------------------------------------------+ >> >> >> reaim.time.file_system_inputs >> >> 290000 +------------------------------------------------------------------+ >> | .+. | >> 280000 |.+..+.+.+..+.+.+.+. +.+..+.+.+..+.+.+..+.+. .+.+. .+..+.+.+..+ | >> 270000 |-+ +. + | >> | | >> 260000 |-+ | >> 250000 |-+ | >> | | >> 240000 |-+ | >> 230000 |-+ | >> | | >> 220000 |-+ | >> 210000 |-+ O | >> | O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O | >> 200000 +------------------------------------------------------------------+ >> >> >> reaim.time.file_system_outputs >> >> 1.15e+07 +----------------------------------------------------------------+ >> | +. | >> 1.1e+07 |-+ .+.. : +.. + + | >> |.+. .+.+.+ +.+. .+..+. .+ + : + + .+..+.+.+.+.. + | >> 1.05e+07 |-+ +. + + + .. + : + + + | >> | + + | >> 1e+07 |-+ | >> | | >> 9.5e+06 |-+ | >> | | >> 9e+06 |-+ O O O O O | >> | O O O O O O | >> 8.5e+06 |-+ O O O O O O O O O O O O O | >> | O O O O | >> 8e+06 +----------------------------------------------------------------+ >> >> >> reaim.parent_time >> >> 140 +---------------------------------------------------------------------+ >> | O | >> 130 |-+ O O O O O O | >> | O O O O O O O | >> | O O O O O O O O O | >> 120 |-+ O O O O O | >> | | >> 110 |-+ | >> | | >> 100 |-+ | >> | | >> | +. | >> 90 |-+ .+.. .+..+.+..+. .+.. .+.. + +.. .+.. .+ | >> |.+..+ +.+ +..+.+ + + +.+..+.+..+.+ +.+. | >> 80 +---------------------------------------------------------------------+ >> >> >> reaim.jobs_per_min >> >> 7500 +--------------------------------------------------------------------+ >> | | >> 7000 |.+..+. .+.+. .+.+..+. .+.. .+ +.+..+.+.+..+.+. .+.+.. | >> | +. +..+.+.+. + + + .. +. + | >> 6500 |-+ + | >> | | >> 6000 |-+ | >> | | >> 5500 |-+ | >> | | >> 5000 |-+ O O O O O O O O O O | >> | O O O O O O O O O O O O O | >> 4500 |-+ O O O O O | >> | | >> 4000 +--------------------------------------------------------------------+ >> >> >> reaim.jobs_per_min_child >> >> 75 +----------------------------------------------------------------------+ >> | | >> 70 |.+..+. .+.+.. .+..+.+.. .+.. .+.. +..+.+.+..+.+..+. .+.+.. | >> | +. +.+..+.+ + + + +. + | >> 65 |-+ + | >> | | >> 60 |-+ | >> | | >> 55 |-+ | >> | | >> 50 |-+ O O O O O O O O O O | >> | O O O O O O O O O O O O O | >> 45 |-+ O O O O O | >> | | >> 40 +----------------------------------------------------------------------+ >> >> >> reaim.std_dev_time >> >> 7 +-----------------------------------------------------------------------+ >> | | >> 6 |-+ O O | >> | O O | >> 5 |-+ O O O O O O O O | >> | O O O O O O O O | >> 4 |-O O O O O O | >> | O O | >> 3 |-+ | >> | | >> 2 |-+ | >> | | >> 1 |.+.. .+..+.+..+.+..+.+..+.+..+.+..+.+..+.+..+.+..+. .+.+..+.+..+.+..+ | >> | + +. | >> 0 +-----------------------------------------------------------------------+ >> >> >> reaim.std_dev_percent >> >> 5.5 +---------------------------------------------------------------------+ >> 5 |-+ O | >> | O O O | >> 4.5 |-+ O O O O O | >> 4 |-+ O O O O O O | >> | O O O O O O | >> 3.5 |-O O O O O | >> 3 |-+ O | >> 2.5 |-+ O | >> | | >> 2 |-+ | >> 1.5 |-+ | >> | .+..+. .+.. .+. .+. .+.. .+ | >> 1 |.+..+.+..+.+ +..+ +.+.+. +. + +.+..+.+..+.+.+..+.+. | >> 0.5 +---------------------------------------------------------------------+ >> >> >> reaim.jti >> >> 99 +--------------------------------------------------------------------+ >> 98.5 |.+..+.+..+.+. .+. .+..+.+. .+. .+.. .+..+ +.+..+.+..+ | >> | +..+ +..+ +. + + | >> 98 |-+ | >> 97.5 |-+ | >> | | >> 97 |-+ | >> 96.5 |-O O O O O | >> 96 |-+ O | >> | O O O O O O O O O O | >> 95.5 |-+ O O O O O | >> 95 |-+ O O O | >> | O O | >> 94.5 |-+ O O | >> 94 +--------------------------------------------------------------------+ >> >> >> reaim.max_jobs_per_min >> >> 7500 +--------------------------------------------------------------------+ >> |.+.. +. | >> 7000 |-+ +. .+.+ .. +..+. .+.. .+ +.+..+.+.+..+.+. .+.+.. | >> | +. + .+. .+ + + + .. +. + | >> | +. + + | >> 6500 |-+ | >> | | >> 6000 |-+ | >> | | >> 5500 |-+ | >> | | >> | O O O O O O O O O | >> 5000 |-O O O O O O O O O | >> | O O O O O O O O O | >> 4500 +--------------------------------------------------------------------+ >> >> >> reaim.workload >> >> 40000 +-------------------------------------------------------------------+ >> | | >> | | >> 38000 |-+ | >> | | >> | | >> 36000 |-+ | >> | | >> 34000 |-+ | >> | | >> | | >> 32000 |-+ | >> | | >> | | >> 30000 +-------------------------------------------------------------------+ >> >> >> [*] bisect-good sample >> [O] bisect-bad sample >> >> >> >> Disclaimer: >> Results have been estimated based on internal Intel analysis and are provided >> for informational purposes only. Any difference in system hardware or software >> design or configuration may affect actual performance. >> >> >> Thanks, >> Rong Chen >>