Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
From:   Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
To:     Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/ptdump: Fix build failure in hashpagetable.c
In-Reply-To: <795158fc1d2b3dff3bf7347881947a887ea9391a.1592227105.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
References: <795158fc1d2b3dff3bf7347881947a887ea9391a.1592227105.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Date:   Tue, 16 Jun 2020 16:42:11 +1000
Message-ID: <87tuzbecl8.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> writes:
> H_SUCCESS is only defined when CONFIG_PPC_PSERIES is defined.

It's always defined in hvcall.h, but it doesn't always get included via
plpar_wrappers.h.

It looks to be CONFIG_SMP=n that causes that, for SMP=y we get a copy
via asm/spinlock.h

> != H_SUCCESS means != 0. Modify the test accordingly.

I guess that's an OK solution.

> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> Fixes: 65e701b2d2a8 ("powerpc/ptdump: drop non vital #ifdefs")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org

I don't think it needs to go to stable, none of the defconfigs hit it,
we don't even really support SMP=n for 64-bit book3s.

cheers

> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
> ---
>  arch/powerpc/mm/ptdump/hashpagetable.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/ptdump/hashpagetable.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/ptdump/hashpagetable.c
> index a2c33efc7ce8..5b8bd34cd3a1 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/ptdump/hashpagetable.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/ptdump/hashpagetable.c
> @@ -258,7 +258,7 @@ static int pseries_find(unsigned long ea, int psize, bool primary, u64 *v, u64 *
>  	for (i = 0; i < HPTES_PER_GROUP; i += 4, hpte_group += 4) {
>  		lpar_rc = plpar_pte_read_4(0, hpte_group, (void *)ptes);
>  
> -		if (lpar_rc != H_SUCCESS)
> +		if (lpar_rc)
>  			continue;
>  		for (j = 0; j < 4; j++) {
>  			if (HPTE_V_COMPARE(ptes[j].v, want_v) &&
> -- 
> 2.25.0