Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3a_=5bPATCH_v2_5/5=5d_drm/tegra=3a_plane=3a_Support_18?=
 =?UTF-8?Q?0=c2=b0_rotation?=
To:     Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@gmail.com>
Cc:     Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
        Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
        Derek Basehore <dbasehore@chromium.org>,
        Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>,
        Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
        Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org,
        "Linux-Kernel@Vger. Kernel. Org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        ML dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
References: <20200614200121.14147-1-digetx@gmail.com>
 <20200614200121.14147-6-digetx@gmail.com>
 <CACvgo50P5i2jX6ZrMD=UuGr_bA=8MbFhYBWBNvkMcdCyJKS5xg@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <e21404bd-49c9-039e-4aef-c4912a9c0640@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 16 Jun 2020 14:25:38 +0300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CACvgo50P5i2jX6ZrMD=UuGr_bA=8MbFhYBWBNvkMcdCyJKS5xg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

16.06.2020 00:47, Emil Velikov пишет:
> Hi all,
> 
> Perhaps a silly question:
> 
> On Mon, 15 Jun 2020 at 08:28, Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Combining horizontal and vertical reflections gives us 180 degrees of
>> rotation.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/dc.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
>>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/dc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/dc.c
>> index f31bca27cde4..ddd9b88f8fce 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/dc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/dc.c
> 
>> +       if (rotation & DRM_MODE_ROTATE_180) {
>> +               plane_state->reflect_x = !plane_state->reflect_x;
>> +               plane_state->reflect_y = !plane_state->reflect_y;
>> +       }
>> +
> As mentioned by Ville the above is already handled by
> drm_rotation_simplify() ... although it makes me wonder:
> 
> 
>>         err = drm_plane_create_rotation_property(&plane->base,
>>                                                  DRM_MODE_ROTATE_0,
>>                                                  DRM_MODE_ROTATE_0 |
>> +                                                DRM_MODE_ROTATE_180 |
>>                                                  DRM_MODE_REFLECT_X |
>>                                                  DRM_MODE_REFLECT_Y);
> 
> Would it make sense for drm_plane_create_rotation_property() itself,
> to add DRM_MODE_ROTATE_180, when both reflections are supported?

Hello Emil,

That's a good point! All DRM_MODE_ROTATE_180 should be removed because
Tegra can't do 180° + reflected-x. The DRM core takes care of 180°
rotation when both x/y reflections are supported.