Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Tue, 16 Jun 2020 16:35:17 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To:     Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc:     Jacky Hu <hengqing.hu@gmail.com>, linux-edac@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tony.luck@intel.com, x86@kernel.org,
        Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@amd.com>,
        linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] MCA and EDAC updates for AMD Family 17h, Model 60h
Message-ID: <20200616143517.GH13515@zn.tnic>
References: <20200607043709.48178-1-hengqing.hu@gmail.com>
 <20200615115950.GG14668@zn.tnic>
 <a9d0cfc4-1aed-d6ed-c6f2-336b56d91f20@roeck-us.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <a9d0cfc4-1aed-d6ed-c6f2-336b56d91f20@roeck-us.net>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 08:01:22AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> Looks like we may have to black-list current measurements
> for that chip, though.
> 
> Guenter
> 
> >> Jacky Hu (2):
> >>   x86/amd_nb: Add Family 17h, Model 60h PCI IDs
> >>   EDAC/amd64: Add family ops for Family 17h Models 60h-6Fh
> >>
> >>  arch/x86/kernel/amd_nb.c  |  5 +++++
> >>  drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> >>  drivers/edac/amd64_edac.h |  3 +++
> >>  drivers/hwmon/k10temp.c   |  2 ++

... meaning I should not take the k10temp changes yet? I can drop them
and take the rest...

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette