Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932570AbWCWTC2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Mar 2006 14:02:28 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932421AbWCWTC2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Mar 2006 14:02:28 -0500 Received: from a222036.upc-a.chello.nl ([62.163.222.36]:14734 "EHLO laptopd505.fenrus.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932563AbWCWTC1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Mar 2006 14:02:27 -0500 Subject: Re: [patch] Ignore MCFG if the mmconfig area isn't reserved in the e820 table From: Arjan van de Ven To: Andi Kleen Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org In-Reply-To: <200603231856.12227.ak@suse.de> References: <1143138170.3147.43.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <200603231856.12227.ak@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 20:02:18 +0100 Message-Id: <1143140539.3147.44.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 (2.2.3-2.fc4) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 584 Lines: 18 > That is e820_mapped(address, address+size, E820_RESERVED) > > And not having a size is definitely wrong on i386 too. s/wrong/not selective enough/ and e820_mapped doesn't check this either anyway, at least not the way you imply it does. I'll do a new patch using this for x86_64 though, no need to make a second function like this. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/