Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 24 Oct 2001 16:40:33 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 24 Oct 2001 16:40:25 -0400 Received: from james.kalifornia.com ([208.179.59.2]:42839 "EHLO james.kalifornia.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 24 Oct 2001 16:40:19 -0400 Message-ID: <3BD7263A.9020100@blue-labs.org> Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 16:36:10 -0400 From: David Ford User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.5+) Gecko/20011022 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Christopher Friesen , kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru CC: Julian Anastasov , Tim Hockin , linux-kernel Subject: Re: issue: deleting one IP alias deletes all In-Reply-To: <3BD65188.1060203@blue-labs.org> <3BD6CA13.613B22EE@nortelnetworks.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org That is IMO bad behavior, it didn't use to do this because I have scripts that rely on this behavior. I'll take it up with the author, Alexey. David Christopher Friesen wrote: David Ford wrote: >Actually it is quite sane. The tool is not. > >Switch to 'ip' instead of 'ifconfig', several large distros now include >it. Addresses can be added and removed completely indiscriminately on >interfaces. > >The "ethN:X" is a legacy design that is now deprecated. > Minor issue...if I create (using 'ip') two addresses on the same subnet on the same device, one of them is primary and the other is secondary. If I then delete the primary address, the second one goes with it. I submit that this is bad behaviour. Chris - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/