Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20200616161427.375651-1-vkuznets@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20200616161427.375651-1-vkuznets@redhat.com>
From:   Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>
Date:   Tue, 16 Jun 2020 09:24:42 -0700
Message-ID: <CALMp9eSWXGQkOOzSrALfZDMj5JHSH=CsK1wKfdj2x2jtV4XJsw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: SVM: drop MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES from emulated MSRs
To:     Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Cc:     kvm list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
        Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
        Like Xu <like.xu@linux.intel.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 9:14 AM Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> state_test/smm_test selftests are failing on AMD with:
> "Unexpected result from KVM_GET_MSRS, r: 51 (failed MSR was 0x345)"
>
> MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES is an emulated MSR indeed but only on Intel,
> make svm_has_emulated_msr() skip it so it is not returned by
> KVM_GET_MSR_INDEX_LIST.

Do we need to support this MSR under SVM for cross-vendor migration?
Or, have we given up on that?