Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964935AbWCWVHa (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Mar 2006 16:07:30 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964937AbWCWVHa (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Mar 2006 16:07:30 -0500 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:48571 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964935AbWCWVH3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Mar 2006 16:07:29 -0500 Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/10] 64 bit resources core changes From: Arjan van de Ven To: Al Viro Cc: Linus Torvalds , vgoyal@in.ibm.com, linux kernel mailing list , Fastboot mailing list , Morton Andrew Morton , "Eric W. Biederman" , galak@kernel.crashing.org, gregkh@suse.de, bcrl@kvack.org, Dave Jiang , Maneesh Soni , Murali In-Reply-To: <20060323210208.GQ27946@ftp.linux.org.uk> References: <20060323195752.GD7175@in.ibm.com> <20060323195944.GE7175@in.ibm.com> <1143145335.3147.52.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <1143147419.3147.54.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <20060323210208.GQ27946@ftp.linux.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 22:07:19 +0100 Message-Id: <1143148039.3147.56.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 (2.2.3-2.fc4) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1219 Lines: 28 On Thu, 2006-03-23 at 21:02 +0000, Al Viro wrote: > On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 09:56:59PM +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > On Thu, 2006-03-23 at 12:52 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, 23 Mar 2006, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > > > > > > > hmmmm are there any platforms where unsigned long long is > 64 bits? > > > > (and yes it would be nice if there was a u64 printf flag ;) > > > > > > Adding a new printf flag is technically _trivial_. > > > > > > The problem is getting gcc not to warn about it every time it sees it > > > (while not losing the gcc format string checking entirely). Do newer gcc's > > > allow some way of saying "this flag takes this type" for extended format > > > definitions? > > > > afaics there is none... even if there was a "just don't warn about this > > one" would be nice.. but I don't see that either. > > -Wformat is what enables those, so we can turn them all off. sure it's all or nothing. not "all but the u64 one" - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/