Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 15:25:51 -0800
From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: "Bryan O'Sullivan" <bos@pathscale.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rdreier@cisco.com, openib-general@openib.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8 of 18] ipath - sysfs and ipathfs support for core driver
Message-ID: <20060323232551.GA31490@kroah.com>
References: <patchbomb.1143072293@eng-12.pathscale.com> <03375633b9c13068de17.1143072301@eng-12.pathscale.com> <20060323054905.GB20672@kroah.com> <1143103485.6411.14.camel@camp4.serpentine.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1143103485.6411.14.camel@camp4.serpentine.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 714
Lines: 19

On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 12:44:45AM -0800, Bryan O'Sullivan wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-03-22 at 21:49 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > Oh, and I like your new filesystem, but where do you propose that it be
> > mounted?
> 
> I don't have any good candidates in mind.  In our development
> environment, we're mounting it in /ipath, but that doesn't seem like a
> good long-term name.  Do you have any suggestions?

Nope, sorry.  At least /ipath is LSB compliant :)

thanks,

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/