Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Tue, 16 Jun 2020 23:24:58 -0700
From:   Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@gmail.com>
To:     Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@nxp.com>
Cc:     timur@kernel.org, Xiubo.Lee@gmail.com, festevam@gmail.com,
        broonie@kernel.org, perex@perex.cz, tiwai@suse.com,
        alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, lgirdwood@gmail.com,
        robh+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] ASoC: fsl_spdif: Add support for imx6sx platform
Message-ID: <20200617062457.GA6411@Asurada-Nvidia>
References: <feda3bb02296455d43aeebb7575918d9b28e1a3f.1592368322.git.shengjiu.wang@nxp.com>
 <53a969a83999de91f3ff2809d78335c3f0cc1ee3.1592368322.git.shengjiu.wang@nxp.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <53a969a83999de91f3ff2809d78335c3f0cc1ee3.1592368322.git.shengjiu.wang@nxp.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 12:30:17PM +0800, Shengjiu Wang wrote:
> The one difference on imx6sx platform is that the root clock
> is shared with ASRC module, so we add a new flags
> "shared_root_clock" which means the root clock is independent,

"shared" means "not independent", against "independent" ;)

> then we will not do the clk_set_rate and clk_round_rate to avoid
> impact ASRC module usage.
> 
> As add a new flags, we include the soc specific data struct.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@nxp.com>

Can add this once fixing the remaining comments:

Reviewed-by: Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@gmail.com>

> +static inline bool fsl_spdif_can_set_clk_rate(struct fsl_spdif_priv *spdif,
> +					      int clk)

Can actually merge into single line as kernel has 100-character
limit now, though 80-char is still preferable for a good coding
style. But I think this one wouldn't be too bad at all.

> @@ -421,7 +456,7 @@ static int spdif_set_sample_rate(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream,
>  	sysclk_df = spdif_priv->sysclk_df[rate];
>  
>  	/* Don't mess up the clocks from other modules */

We can drop this comments now as it's out-of-date and the name of
the new helper function is straightforward enough.

> -	if (clk != STC_TXCLK_SPDIF_ROOT)
> +	if (!fsl_spdif_can_set_clk_rate(spdif_priv, clk))
>  		goto clk_set_bypass;
>  
>  	/* The S/PDIF block needs a clock of 64 * fs * txclk_df */