Received: by 2002:a05:6902:102b:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x11csp286744ybt; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 00:31:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzgzTvNC2MLgEwIoeLwWvR7iaou3E5BSyp4o6MhQ1cH48/FGeRKzkwrMwF9dvAkYJWu6PWR X-Received: by 2002:a50:ab16:: with SMTP id s22mr6116750edc.345.1592379076645; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 00:31:16 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1592379076; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=oy0drMvsJv9pTWE7B53z9kvWJg1ftSNmHuVfECjViTD8/mNXk4rXSDg7S/c3DxtNx0 obvYCS//sz0ItJcLMdZkQSLQ7hcUYEQoqz5En4LcLj9x19KNgxSzPX6y7bpbe81MEKOA wbiCFzGaK+lVefoYldEqh2FW/E9t77BGxeGv3waOvadKPmhqTicSz+cT/lT92wE4tccr EZyUgG0bHBiuNYTZvno2VWLyQL67j1b3ACHXjvdDaoL52v6CbJyvwpU4OAYwdG2gfxBn CQbMi2fhtXTR2m8xCHOgeco7/Eysbz/OKxvTQp9k5dy9fR8OOkzHfllLpgQHSSgHmzpM d92w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version; bh=kxyFmibDG5zSWuXtIhnkYe3H38OpnFHk954/p0T/5F0=; b=RgW0caV/xdRnW1hv+/pRUNd/p4MLCLD1MP/uY8WYzz/fdFPYoOLGihAp1c/dyqBKi4 KmVuPrZLlgsXIzb8neoPJfSLvWst9AElIPI+LgW1fueYhPAjy4ocIfSen1Jb0zfjEAu1 ioVLJjJqIikdK3AzkeS/zaG2NjuSpT6XaVGdzo+vmhWF6m5/PUxdHtyXcBUODvtCK9cS G+J77O4Izo0i0M9241YNiqoyugtloQL++EPZAagM1HY95B6g/9e2vH6Xv8Ibv+1ggoD3 2isPXsi0ntt8jGfsVaU7KqEZTivU+eC+KiUijthtdDCNADMDqWX5yfhW9F0DHxhTG96u HGsw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id o18si12690607edv.545.2020.06.17.00.30.54; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 00:31:16 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726275AbgFQH1B (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 17 Jun 2020 03:27:01 -0400 Received: from mail-oi1-f195.google.com ([209.85.167.195]:34907 "EHLO mail-oi1-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725873AbgFQH1A (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Jun 2020 03:27:00 -0400 Received: by mail-oi1-f195.google.com with SMTP id k4so949246oik.2; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 00:26:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=kxyFmibDG5zSWuXtIhnkYe3H38OpnFHk954/p0T/5F0=; b=L1RiL0nnX2c/NYlKiW5iz3AiMph1l9VRBoKIePm5qqptDOLYXDqPn5MMdix1GOKLW8 B1QVGhVm3Zie27Mty60B5BVESniQJfLX7NZ5GOzgRmM5t7BlZjOjUYJYXBHkj9LzsdoB sVvF2OQBuDv8Kj/+tBor8qS/CafZUk1rLlKaGAocXbAiP/JVYP9JOX51MDbcB3Bo0NE1 0DjTgRWL4A2XOwYUWWL0blm3RYLUKlHV7tP4SX4tP/Zw1hI5WVMKm7GCS7syr3Hqfe9+ qlMIBvAXyd0GPQTreWucvnKHaeHvE+N0Kq5xKmqpm+yJ7Ruvom/zKACau4+DiJcBZQt9 F+bA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533gPJoqyFc8YWCkqLjDdPcm6RawCZOmXEpZzQvhMkmfjdOF/ax2 +Npa5u1Hx3RY3XwEsF7ktQK6rT4gNw/2Z/uAbzM= X-Received: by 2002:a54:4006:: with SMTP id x6mr6155596oie.148.1592378818667; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 00:26:58 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200605024919.56177-1-navid.emamdoost@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20200605024919.56177-1-navid.emamdoost@gmail.com> From: Geert Uytterhoeven Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 09:26:47 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: rcar: handle pm_runtime_get_sync failure case To: Navid Emamdoost Cc: Linus Walleij , Bartosz Golaszewski , "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Navid Emamdoost , Qiushi Wu , Kangjie Lu , Stephen McCamant Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Navid, On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 4:50 AM Navid Emamdoost wrote: > Calling pm_runtime_get_sync increments the counter even in case of > failure, causing incorrect ref count. Call pm_runtime_put if > pm_runtime_get_sync fails. > > Signed-off-by: Navid Emamdoost Thanks for your patch! > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-rcar.c > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-rcar.c > @@ -250,8 +250,10 @@ static int gpio_rcar_request(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset) > int error; > > error = pm_runtime_get_sync(p->dev); > - if (error < 0) > + if (error < 0) { > + pm_runtime_put(p->dev); As per [1], I would like to see a call to pm_runtime_put_noidle() instead. [1] http://lore.kernel.org/r/CAJZ5v0i87NGcy9+kxubScdPDyByr8ypQWcGgBFn+V-wDd69BHQ@mail.gmail.com > return error; > + } > > error = pinctrl_gpio_request(chip->base + offset); > if (error) Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds