Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Wed, 17 Jun 2020 10:30:41 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To:     Rong Chen <rong.a.chen@intel.com>
Cc:     Marco Elver <elver@google.com>, kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>,
        kbuild-all@lists.01.org,
        Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [kbuild-all] Re: [PATCH] compiler_attributes.h: Support
 no_sanitize_undefined check with GCC 4
Message-ID: <20200617083041.GD2531@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
References: <202006160328.6MfJNuqX%lkp@intel.com>
 <20200615231529.GA119644@google.com>
 <20200616131921.GV2531@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <20200617010051.GS5653@shao2-debian>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200617010051.GS5653@shao2-debian>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 09:00:51AM +0800, Rong Chen wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 03:19:21PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

> > 301805 N + Jun 16 kernel test rob (5.8K) [peterz-queue:x86/entry] BUILD SUCCESS 8e8bb06d199a5aa7a534aa3b3fc0abbbc11ca438
> > 
> > Why that thing is claiming SUCCESS when it introduces a build error I
> > don't know.

> Sorry for the misunderstanding, some folks complained that it's too
> noisy when there're only new warnings in a "BUILD REGRESSION" report,
> so we changed to use "BUILD SUCCESS" if there's no new build error. To
> avoid misunderstanding, we'll change build complete report title to
> "BUILD SUCCESS WITH WARNING" for new warnings.

Thanks Rong!