From: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
To: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [interbench numbers] Re: interactive task starvation
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 11:21:01 +1100
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Willy Tarreau <willy@w.ods.org>,
       Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
       bugsplatter@gmail.com, Peter Williams <pwil3058@bigpond.net.au>
References: <1142592375.7895.43.camel@homer> <1143093229.9303.1.camel@homer> <1143112045.9065.15.camel@homer>
In-Reply-To: <1143112045.9065.15.camel@homer>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200603241121.02868.kernel@kolivas.org>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1089
Lines: 38

On Thursday 23 March 2006 22:07, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> Nothing conclusive.  Some of the difference may be because interbench
> has a dependency on the idle sleep path popping tasks in a prio 16
> instead of 18.  Some of it may be because I'm not restricting IO, doing
> that makes a bit of difference.  Some of it is definitely plain old
> jitter.

Thanks for those! Just a clarification please

> virgin

I assume 2.6.16-rc6-mm2 ?

> throttle patches with throttling disabled

With your full patchset but no throttling enabled?

> minus idle sleep

Full patchset -throttling-idlesleep ?

> minus don't restrict IO

Full patchset -throttling-idlesleep-restrictio ?

Can you please email the latest separate patches so we can see them in 
isolation? I promise I won't ask for any more interbench numbers any time 
soon :)

Thanks!

Cheers,
Con
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/