Received: by 2002:a05:6902:102b:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x11csp684123ybt; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 11:10:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwvbFA7K0PcpFUx0P/52YyxgFZlN9ScREdU22owF7LE36yuRb4vayzRV8Sa1Yfp1cphGp2D X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:c06:: with SMTP id co6mr400352edb.298.1592417439546; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 11:10:39 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1592417439; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=jr2zu+6QgXj0B6LQth2T455urwuQAvOv8Gry4oPXk6srJfwl/A+GwmbSaRP0Fn/j7Y QTS5EPjDHIXsMMtAW/Jr3XwhcA3RJB9jyc/vYz0q/vslDZ9KQb5BupxUMdmetKvOXw6g fG0J+1xLYnQ2WPoHPuRe9T86YGm6V0OiQ18sMEMJrARqI0sLkdR+VkkIo3G5Y92Issod 5v33/t1CowUbEfYtghI3VwdXERXCDI+LOFr7HRY0jKNBm3KCer92snu5C6ek4I6j6cMg cylDDV8VzW9/h4qVVghIzkDMJrQgacQQ89pTml4j5V/0xtnOgvlUpHBtXJX3TaWu72Aw jYSg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:reply-to:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=Hxjcaq+Yi6F7b9RzzmTeLqFqpSrFIeiejEC+VtUmAFU=; b=qLHvIhq+Dc++dmSzmnXXJJZcSVIullNHKldsngV6hokF8kUq2Kr/OCfBDCyXOBgfLd pDBkbUYVED99Zo9s2BTBbMVoBgMygiOJKGx6uo79T+3sH8wXHk2Z32IHmaIR0HqWLkg1 TGe/9OmKAYnqKr0zVNiFepz6vZlinwDbzWbAPd94zKjmzQeu9DhcwQc4txXpDcuE4d6+ Sz8QcgupV92lNNGZ3T3uf0Xa9zAtJ7AveAX0igNE4sMAMmvT4VvusHEgaaidhnVBIYBU Jo+3r+TcNAnpxgxUmm0JDdOgRKKzEoh4VfyxvbPJiW0w0eZMunhvrfVa7AlJ0PbSZWOd g8Hw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=unW1BDEe; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id bm5si427737edb.332.2020.06.17.11.10.16; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 11:10:39 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=unW1BDEe; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727069AbgFQSGI (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 17 Jun 2020 14:06:08 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:33524 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727044AbgFQSGH (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Jun 2020 14:06:07 -0400 Received: from paulmck-ThinkPad-P72.home (50-39-105-78.bvtn.or.frontiernet.net [50.39.105.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BDEB320897; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 18:06:06 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1592417166; bh=1KE2XXvZBw6ABjIUl6aRNNUR2Z7JBARQO8kTjeAHPuE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Reply-To:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=unW1BDEecxeoXqgGlEIs/lOci+UozQYght2iIvY1GsBDa/48ncqbRzBOVGStpWR/4 Kac+7VhLsg9gu50a26jpFTSSruSWrTE528zyusWhwyy3fAvjQ9tf+VdxuQqORvEiOt JiudZfIvO5XjoB9gHDoVqhHbVaGWQKN3H1zcBFPM= Received: by paulmck-ThinkPad-P72.home (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9D72D352353C; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 11:06:06 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 11:06:06 -0700 From: "Paul E. McKenney" To: Joel Fernandes Cc: Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org, x86 Subject: Re: [PATCH] rcu/performance: Fix kfree_perf_init() build warning on 32-bit kernels Message-ID: <20200617180606.GA23728@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72> Reply-To: paulmck@kernel.org References: <158923078019.390.12609597570329519463.tip-bot2@tip-bot2> <20200526182744.GA3722128@gmail.com> <20200527011413.GD149611@google.com> <20200603181109.GA5438@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200603181109.GA5438@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jun 03, 2020 at 11:11:09AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 09:14:13PM -0400, Joel Fernandes wrote: > > On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 08:27:44PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: [ . . . ] > > > BTW., could we please also rename this code from 'PERF_TEST'/'perf test' > > > to 'PERFORMANCE_TEST'/'performance test'? At first glance I always > > > mistakenly believe that it's somehow related to perf, while it isn't. =B-) > > > > Would it be better to call it 'RCUPERF_TEST' instead of the > > 'RCU_PERFORMANCE_TEST' you are proposing? I feel the word 'PERFORMANCE' is > > too long. Also, 'rcuperf test' instead of the 'rcu performance test' you are > > proposing. I am Ok with doing it however you and Paul want it though, let me > > know. > > As long as we are bikeshedding the name... How about refscale.c and > RCU_REF_SCALE_TEST on the one hand and rcuscale.c and RCU_SCALE_TEST on > the other? That keeps the names reasonably short and does not allude > to perf at all. Hearing no objections, I will go with the scale/SCALE names. Thanx, Paul