Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1423133AbWCXFDG (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Mar 2006 00:03:06 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1423134AbWCXFDF (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Mar 2006 00:03:05 -0500 Received: from ishtar.tlinx.org ([64.81.245.74]:26758 "EHLO ishtar.tlinx.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1423133AbWCXFDE (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Mar 2006 00:03:04 -0500 Message-ID: <44237D87.70300@tlinx.org> Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 21:03:03 -0800 From: Linda Walsh User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Linux-Kernel Subject: Security downgrade? CONFIG_HOTPLUG required in 2.6.16? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1030 Lines: 25 I had this config'ed out in 2.6.15 for machine that didn't have any hotpluggable devices. It is also configured with all the modules it needs and has kernel-module loading disabled. What has changed in 2.6.16 that my "static" machine now needs hotplugging? As I understand it, hotplugging requires application-level support code (in /etc/) and a special application level "demon" to run in order to support these requests. I'd prefer my kernel not to be dependent on a run-time demon to load "arbitrary" (user defined) segments of code that could come from any source -- usually outside the vanilla kernel tree. If I don't want a specific kernel or machine to be dynamically reconfigurable after boot, why do I need to build in a mechanism for runtime loading of modules? Linda - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/