Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1422797AbWCXJbH (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Mar 2006 04:31:07 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1422799AbWCXJbH (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Mar 2006 04:31:07 -0500 Received: from pproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.166.180]:17656 "EHLO pproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1422797AbWCXJbF convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Mar 2006 04:31:05 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=QPIAb1wb/maRzTOql6dYmxF+8JZsmbdawoArXjm2FJ71e6GIJ0mUz1XrPTtlru2CW+Gq/dRHxnrHQJdomXO9hBnj3wJfISi6ld45JjH/dxz+xBWam9rBNoum4wya0IZf65gTKpQLOzv/FYJQnl/vNnE95KG6pReyi+MpbVUcJ4s= Message-ID: <5a4c581d0603240130t6cb717b6kbaaf67e0e66b85e6@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 10:30:57 +0100 From: "Alessandro Suardi" To: "Zhu Yi" Subject: Re: [2.6.16-gitX] heavy performance regression in ipw2200 wireless driver Cc: "Andrew Morton" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "James Ketrenos" , netdev@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <1143171674.17270.195.camel@debian.sh.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Disposition: inline References: <5a4c581d0603221724m391f5466l8a2af3ae7f0aacae@mail.gmail.com> <20060322191057.304962a4.akpm@osdl.org> <5a4c581d0603230602s1a868a4apbfd79ec2bc568011@mail.gmail.com> <1143171674.17270.195.camel@debian.sh.intel.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1470 Lines: 36 On 3/24/06, Zhu Yi wrote: > On Thu, 2006-03-23 at 15:02 +0100, Alessandro Suardi wrote: > > That scp test shows 50%ish - but that was a quickie. The VNC > > client even reported a 719Kbps throughput down from the more > > usual 11500Kbps it starts off with. The first scp I tried when the > > sluggishness was intolerable was going at 200KB/s - which > > shows the problem can easily get in the neighborhood of an > > order of magnitude. > > What kind of wireless encryption do you use? We turned off hardware > encryption by default recently as a workaround for a firmware restart > bug. You might want to load module with "modprobe ipw2200 hwcrypto=1" > and retest. I actually use no encryption yet, as I still have to find out time to call D-Link about the fact that my router hangs when I try to set up a whitelist of MAC addresses for the wireless AP; WPA would be up next... Would loading the module with h/w encryption turned on make any difference in my case ? Thanks, PS don't tell my neighbors ;) --alessandro "Dreamer ? Each one of us is a dreamer. We just push it down deep because we are repeatedly told that we are not allowed to dream in real life" (Reinhold Ziegler) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/