Received: by 2002:a05:6902:102b:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x11csp1130342ybt; Thu, 18 Jun 2020 00:58:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwkZzr8FU/7Ea9uC7lJYQhopz0lyjB14RcrDaf0F5NlckRNT4FQKNNGfn7WFCftjq2pKXSA X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:a4d:: with SMTP id bt13mr2914902edb.338.1592467124905; Thu, 18 Jun 2020 00:58:44 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1592467124; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=gyhUNTEQwxjD52skDVIOmBrA/sIAdLIJPV3JMSPWLa8UzkIMMTweVLuoYaakmAOBd/ qPCmTTy3Ci6LqCWNInpWO/5Nys6WraNk5kn9E7hKFMVB3NEqbuGtIhBH5rWSUqggxtN2 9L7plwPLJWrRKZJMKoR+E83aEbBopcUMx0DArnWdVnPDl4YF+jflU/5Lyd0mp2Z7XJR/ hi3RIPtTGtYqrOxRLavuivIH8uH50dA7ClZNt3PsvcbCl2/z8GDAgmMxg3G2zfyzvp7W eEUDBjT7nsPRjjsPl1xKIv4qc0f4DnzL2/tH/9kBWppVoo64/1eZXsfom7S7BAyNvzco mUYg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :dkim-signature; bh=9krHxDm9232DkZH73IfiKQDn78nhY5adj2UGMySsUag=; b=dujexZ6oul6RK00PKfmD2SJWbCxTrSd3Pt96koec+nYUZhT2qJfcNikhKjZu/CwcW0 haIxzgO2bDmw83tLOhNdxAA6rmXz18OGz5I+Lu0MsWWE53/X3hZ/Z5nR0Wlq5qqa+A3z iTZ2ufSv9zJcxMjbf42BHDXQcVeLBPXMLnLXYwB2X0SqadsdEoKlVqonCJQar/V098dM fxJHmIR+hEYrrn0gp7LsGpfnJ/iiBF9kyj8yFkr7U1TRkiOtwC8XeGwv+QAlwB1yGfgo 1Wx886WR3XVhpOmdwR+z4CkUNe2zDiCF5Iy0A+wpMOoi9xXKbu3vm6kEfQKMHDsOZy8v KecQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b=C0JO+OqU; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id b19si1461980edx.506.2020.06.18.00.58.21; Thu, 18 Jun 2020 00:58:44 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b=C0JO+OqU; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728246AbgFRH4T (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 18 Jun 2020 03:56:19 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50868 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727964AbgFRH4S (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Jun 2020 03:56:18 -0400 Received: from mail-lf1-x144.google.com (mail-lf1-x144.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::144]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 198EEC061755 for ; Thu, 18 Jun 2020 00:56:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lf1-x144.google.com with SMTP id c11so2898890lfh.8 for ; Thu, 18 Jun 2020 00:56:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=9krHxDm9232DkZH73IfiKQDn78nhY5adj2UGMySsUag=; b=C0JO+OqUyzOIPzVhe0IKx5WiIHZGVLIjjF8TPiG06mccd1TI0Qcu4Z8e7q4ImmuvWC y/zNLAWSG6DGOwuj4XlorHkNxi0G6F/mXRLNYhYVUVTiSyEBK26ys7DSNG6a90kQAjuC oIPSY50dBh7S1WLtoJDf1JDy5g7zWJwC0uCEbfA/4kksWZDQU5m95QeW9tvVNk9PBjJm wbPoRxwcQFyRiP807OppItugR1cicnXpSfHpZY7shsPjFCva1FhO9KZ6WtXs9Ou8WrOD gDBwGOVmstHfGaW5MpoWs457chL7M/SCdEgJmd7uAMdZc178bvY+yIHqi1eCRxnGzIfH IBiA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=9krHxDm9232DkZH73IfiKQDn78nhY5adj2UGMySsUag=; b=iSsfWRAqEPUoksKfMFTuImk7BssCzIsqs/XB4gL2qLmmBxN2FcDW4H/shB082zWoRb /WkZvUajxHrxZ2ye5949nTA0z03xCJu+sRO5x1NBMFK1w1Ma1p6IsBS6r317LH8v/hgy idMbbe0r0R4nb/BhgtpOggV4l0Me7fo03d0UdFCWDgXAkFfbW+Qqp7HFLTnZvL53C6oO /yZxfU4CkNAAiusWto49wHSGAPnN4ntFApTXYoR5w2if1ow1unAyl1IBvnGQfaKcOJS4 /mS2MVdLq9cQk64m73EgXtR11125uayWFgyfH/QWKY0K6oauFYy0hqr/iz1nJSvGJsY/ Midw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531FB/DAgECAqX7aQhw08g0JaxmrdSf6zE7HZQLoWzvRXb1E3USv +nzcglndkFA6zHrk5jfQCcVgYA== X-Received: by 2002:ac2:5df2:: with SMTP id z18mr1652377lfq.151.1592466976306; Thu, 18 Jun 2020 00:56:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jade (h-249-223.A175.priv.bahnhof.se. [98.128.249.223]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e21sm526724ljb.135.2020.06.18.00.56.15 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 18 Jun 2020 00:56:15 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2020 09:56:13 +0200 From: Jens Wiklander To: Jarkko Sakkinen Cc: Maxim Uvarov , Linux Kernel Mailing List , "tee-dev @ lists . linaro . org" , peterhuewe@gmx.de, Jason Gunthorpe , Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Sumit Garg Subject: Re: [PATCHv8 0/3] optee: register drivers on optee bus Message-ID: <20200618075613.GA97184@jade> References: <20200604175851.758-1-maxim.uvarov@linaro.org> <20200616082907.GA2305431@jade> <20200617233755.GI62794@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200617233755.GI62794@linux.intel.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 02:37:55AM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 10:29:07AM +0200, Jens Wiklander wrote: > > Hi Maxim and Jarkko, > > > > On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 05:32:40PM +0300, Maxim Uvarov wrote: > > > ping. > > > Patchset was reviewed and all comments are codeverd. Optee-os patches > > > were merged. These kernel patches look like they are hanging > > > somewhere... > > > > I'm almost OK with this patchset, except that > > Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-optee-devices needs to be updated > > for the new kernel version and TEE mailing list which we're changing right > > now. > > > > The last patch touches files I'm not maintainer of. That patch depends > > on the previous patches so it makes sense to keep them together. If a > > TPM device driver maintainer would ack that patch I can take it via my > > tree. Or we can do it the other way around (with a v9 patchset), > > whichever is preferred. > > > > Cheers, > > Jens > > Probably easier if you pick all three and I ack the one touching TPM. Makes sense, let's do that. Cheers, Jens