Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751115AbWCXPs0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Mar 2006 10:48:26 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751122AbWCXPs0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Mar 2006 10:48:26 -0500 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:13777 "EHLO mx2.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751115AbWCXPsZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Mar 2006 10:48:25 -0500 From: Andi Kleen To: Arjan van de Ven Subject: Re: [patch] Ignore MCFG if the mmconfig area isn't reserved in thee820 table Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 16:48:19 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 Cc: Ashok Raj , akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <1143138170.3147.43.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <200603241639.54192.ak@suse.de> <44241359.3070409@linux.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <44241359.3070409@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200603241648.19901.ak@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 640 Lines: 16 On Friday 24 March 2006 16:42, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > Andi Kleen wrote: > > In theory they should be the same. What do you think is different? > > in practice the x86-64 version returns "success" if there is one byte in the entire > memory range that complies with the requested type, even if the rest of the range is > of another type. I would consider that a bug. Please send fix. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/