Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932192AbWCXSyn (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Mar 2006 13:54:43 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932598AbWCXSyn (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Mar 2006 13:54:43 -0500 Received: from smtp106.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([209.191.85.216]:29375 "HELO smtp106.mail.mud.yahoo.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S932192AbWCXSym (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Mar 2006 13:54:42 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com.au; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:X-Accept-Language:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=t8kmQPJBd1OaafMENO1tZUDkXw7oewYeE+XWnKrWwGUEe2d6hS4BcolzZa864QuywW1aDkdKk5SvuLsuG5fj4iSphLs3P3VfnhgMKf5gptCfiVVOWA5UAdoDOQtc2vGAlquK+3Wcp9yA/2h30tMHlld++oNlisvieZOdoh6csY8= ; Message-ID: <44242D4D.40702@yahoo.com.au> Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 04:33:01 +1100 From: Nick Piggin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20051007 Debian/1.7.12-1 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kirill Korotaev CC: "Eric W. Biederman" , haveblue@us.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, herbert@13thfloor.at, devel@openvz.org, serue@us.ibm.com, akpm@osdl.org, sam@vilain.net, Alexey Kuznetsov , Pavel Emelianov , Stanislav Protassov Subject: Re: [RFC] Virtualization steps References: <44242A3F.1010307@sw.ru> In-Reply-To: <44242A3F.1010307@sw.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1381 Lines: 32 Kirill Korotaev wrote: > Eric, Herbert, > > I think it is quite clear, that without some agreement on all these > virtualization issues, we won't be able to commit anything good to > mainstream. My idea is to gather our efforts to get consensus on most > clean parts of code first and commit them one by one. > > The proposal is quite simple. We have 4 parties in this conversation > (maybe more?): IBM guys, OpenVZ, VServer and Eric Biederman. We discuss > the areas which should be considered step by step. Send patches for each > area, discuss, come to some agreement and all 4 parties Sign-Off the > patch. After that it goes to Andrew/Linus. Worth trying? Oh, after you come to an agreement and start posting patches, can you also outline why we want this in the kernel (what it does that low level virtualization doesn't, etc, etc), and how and why you've agreed to implement it. Basically, some background and a summary of your discussions for those who can't follow everything. Or is that a faq item? Thanks, Nick -- SUSE Labs, Novell Inc. Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/