Received: by 2002:a05:6902:102b:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x11csp1643949ybt; Thu, 18 Jun 2020 13:42:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwo1UZgqKQjS8pVOr6abN7K1B7c2F/PRYhb2sX0VypFI1bdTpGUYspwvcSrZZBODdHvhzSc X-Received: by 2002:aa7:d283:: with SMTP id w3mr62834edq.262.1592512971423; Thu, 18 Jun 2020 13:42:51 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1592512971; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=nKlxI6GEfPi0LOZRR4orvRUnWfhFhC2vo+aryuGcUPSqa38lmBEzvqa2twCEcIUl2q HM42muVtmXL0pq+AUe3hJxRy71eRDDG6OalkLaFIY9Q3JnsS1/GJ5eoaA5dOC5qWrzY/ 0qk6sl0qbAW7HqTyjtzNUup8ENN2eQhW+Hlxle0JuBRMJlf4BElEYesnAbBw2LvwocAf pl1NO4W6BQ48nr+9udLkJigzsVbbKtUq6X6AoEnlTb7qi5SmWPLaC3HrxucRrqlAb019 OAOeE7GHmghtcYTyz4WMG0RHTEROZIwikPDYIe4XN6qt5aomL/O7eorafa2JdH/QiOmg DoxA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from; bh=+ySuUc7Olf89pHt7wirmH797+gruY2olfD0Fi+/k0Gw=; b=CpE8qVh036XUDlO8kYKDww6fd0nU/v8BEUmWCVKISn9x0ZTRDBNDhDLvaJFByd/Ruq o+MKyoMLge3YlHsLjvv+nsqq9sv4LNvWhSq4V5CjMGbrGlDFG1IgvhtNwuXly27czozk GJOeocAxTHI6V+YehTrxOkeCxjbyibcJULCtAJ8AobLRq25C2s/nN2JmRpnB+EtevqFQ bbFj24bOspf6RP+NfWjb8Lo5R5U9kAyyNUwW1bvklIoNtVOoW5nAvd+ma6w16BWXnkED u13XPGZC1cs4gu+jJumLXYW4wYXzrhU/JOrFdDZ0Q705U4U8DbZupPN+0zgqqMLqhwOb vHKA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id np3si2547969ejb.144.2020.06.18.13.42.27; Thu, 18 Jun 2020 13:42:51 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730380AbgFRSZp (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 18 Jun 2020 14:25:45 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:35258 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727041AbgFRSZo (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Jun 2020 14:25:44 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [IPv6:2a0a:51c0:0:12e:550::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C732C06174E; Thu, 18 Jun 2020 11:25:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from p5de0bf0b.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([93.224.191.11] helo=nanos.tec.linutronix.de) by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1jlzEB-0000M3-As; Thu, 18 Jun 2020 20:25:31 +0200 Received: by nanos.tec.linutronix.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C790B101482; Thu, 18 Jun 2020 20:25:30 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Andy Lutomirski Cc: Sasha Levin , Andrew Lutomirski , Andi Kleen , Jonathan Corbet , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , X86 ML , Shuah Khan , Greg KH , Tony Luck , "Bae\, Chang Seok" , Dave Hansen , Peter Zijlstra , "open list\:DOCUMENTATION" , LKML , Jarkko Sakkinen Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 00/16] Enable FSGSBASE instructions In-Reply-To: References: <20200528201402.1708239-1-sashal@kernel.org> <874kr8cv9i.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2020 20:25:30 +0200 Message-ID: <87wo44b59h.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: - X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required, ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Andy Lutomirski writes: > Is there a plan to deal with: > > /* > * This function has some ABI oddities. > * > * A 32-bit ptracer probably expects that writing FS or GS will change > * FSBASE or GSBASE respectively. In the absence of FSGSBASE support, > * this code indeed has that effect. When FSGSBASE is added, this > * will require a special case. > * > * For existing 64-bit ptracers, writing FS or GS *also* currently > * changes the base if the selector is nonzero the next time the task > * is run. This behavior may? not be needed, and trying to preserve it > * when FSGSBASE is added would be complicated at best. > */ > > in arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c? Not that I'm aware of.