Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964797AbWCXTVj (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Mar 2006 14:21:39 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964796AbWCXTVj (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Mar 2006 14:21:39 -0500 Received: from mail.cs.umn.edu ([128.101.33.102]:35319 "EHLO mail.cs.umn.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964795AbWCXTVi (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Mar 2006 14:21:38 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17444.18012.796603.193315@hound.rchland.ibm.com> Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 13:19:56 -0600 To: Mike Christie Cc: Dave C Boutcher , Jeff Garzik , Arjan van de Ven , Alan Cox , Ian Pratt , Anthony Liguori , Chris Wright , virtualization@lists.osdl.org, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ian Pratt , ian.pratt@cl.cam.ac.uk, SCSI Mailing List Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 35/35] Add Xen virtual block device driver. In-Reply-To: <442442CB.4090603@cs.wisc.edu> References: <4421D943.1090804@garzik.org> <1143202673.18986.5.camel@localhost.localdomain> <4423E853.1040707@garzik.org> <4423F60B.6020805@garzik.org> <1143207657.2882.65.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <4423F91F.4060007@garzik.org> <17444.4455.240044.724257@hound.rchland.ibm.com> <442442CB.4090603@cs.wisc.edu> X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 21.4.1 From: boutcher@cs.umn.edu (Dave C Boutcher) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 957 Lines: 24 Mike Christie wrote: > Does the IBM vscsi code/SPEC follow the SRP SPEC or is it slightly > modified? We also have a SRP initiator in kernel now too. It is just not > in the drivers/scsi dir. The goal was to follow the SRP spec 100%. We added one other optional command set (different protocol identifier than SRP) to exchange some information like "who is at the other end", but the intent was that the SRP part was right from the spec. I think, since we implemented this in three operating systems (Linux, AIX, and OS/400) using the T10 spec as the reference that we are probably pretty close. And yeah, I'm aware that there is another SRP implementation in the kernel...Merging would be good... Dave B - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/