Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751187AbWCYAc0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Mar 2006 19:32:26 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751230AbWCYAc0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Mar 2006 19:32:26 -0500 Received: from tama5.ecl.ntt.co.jp ([129.60.39.102]:394 "EHLO tama5.ecl.ntt.co.jp") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751187AbWCYAcY (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Mar 2006 19:32:24 -0500 To: boutcher@cs.umn.edu Cc: michaelc@cs.wisc.edu, jeff@garzik.org, arjan@infradead.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, m+Ian.Pratt@cl.cam.ac.uk, aliguori@us.ibm.com, chrisw@sous-sol.org, virtualization@lists.osdl.org, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ian.pratt@xensource.com, ian.pratt@cl.cam.ac.uk, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 35/35] Add Xen virtual block device driver. From: FUJITA Tomonori In-Reply-To: <17444.18012.796603.193315@hound.rchland.ibm.com> References: <17444.4455.240044.724257@hound.rchland.ibm.com> <442442CB.4090603@cs.wisc.edu> <17444.18012.796603.193315@hound.rchland.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20060325093218K.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 09:32:18 +0900 X-Dispatcher: imput version 20040704(IM147) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1455 Lines: 31 From: boutcher@cs.umn.edu (Dave C Boutcher) Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 35/35] Add Xen virtual block device driver. Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 13:19:56 -0600 > > Mike Christie wrote: > > Does the IBM vscsi code/SPEC follow the SRP SPEC or is it slightly > > modified? We also have a SRP initiator in kernel now too. It is just not > > in the drivers/scsi dir. > > The goal was to follow the SRP spec 100%. We added one other optional > command set (different protocol identifier than SRP) to exchange some > information like "who is at the other end", but the intent was that > the SRP part was right from the spec. > > I think, since we implemented this in three operating systems (Linux, > AIX, and OS/400) using the T10 spec as the reference that we are probably > pretty close. About the target side, the lun structure is very different the spec (tgt implements this as a user-space library). > And yeah, I'm aware that there is another SRP implementation in the > kernel...Merging would be good... Do you have any plans for this? I've been thinking about writing something like scsi_transport_srp, which can help the initiator and target drivers. I like to enable tgt to support RDMA-capable adapters. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/