Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751107AbWCYI2z (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Mar 2006 03:28:55 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751077AbWCYI2z (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Mar 2006 03:28:55 -0500 Received: from mail22.syd.optusnet.com.au ([211.29.133.160]:45987 "EHLO mail22.syd.optusnet.com.au") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751107AbWCYI2y (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Mar 2006 03:28:54 -0500 From: Con Kolivas To: Radoslaw Szkodzinski Subject: Re: [ck] [benchmark] Interbench 2.6.16-ck/mm Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 19:28:38 +1100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 Cc: ck@vds.kolivas.org, "=?iso-8859-1?q?Andr=E9_Goddard?= Rosa" , linux list References: <200603251351.57341.kernel@kolivas.org> <200603251501.32592.kernel@kolivas.org> <200603250921.32409.astralstorm@gorzow.mm.pl> In-Reply-To: <200603250921.32409.astralstorm@gorzow.mm.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200603251928.39190.kernel@kolivas.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 834 Lines: 20 On Saturday 25 March 2006 19:21, Radoslaw Szkodzinski wrote: > On Saturday 25 March 2006 05:01, Con Kolivas wrote yet: > > I don't expect that staircase will be better in every single situation. > > However it will be better more often, especially when it counts (like > > audio or video skipping) and far more predictable. All that in 300 lines > > less code :) > > I thinks the main difference is those other scheduler improvements. > Some of them are compatible with staircase. > Could you also try a mixed and matched 2.6.16-ck1+mm? You're kidding, right? Check the code. Cheers, Con - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/