Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 14:06:19 +0530
From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@in.ibm.com>
To: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: Question on build_sched_domains
Message-ID: <20060325083619.GC17011@in.ibm.com>
Reply-To: vatsa@in.ibm.com
References: <20060324025834.GD8903@in.ibm.com> <20060324071255.GB22150@in.ibm.com> <4423A391.4000301@yahoo.com.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4423A391.4000301@yahoo.com.au>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 803
Lines: 20

On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 06:45:21PM +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> Yeah I think what's happening is that the sched groups structures
> are not shared between nodes. (It's been a while since I looked at
> this code, and it is a bit tricky to follow).

Its really odd that sched group structure aren't shared between nodes in some 
case (sched_group_nodes) and are shared in other cases (sched_group_cpus, 
sched_group_core, sched_group_phys).

Also is the GFP_ATOMIC allocation really required (for
sched_group_nodes) in build_sched_domains()?

-- 
Regards,
vatsa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/