Received: by 2002:a05:6902:102b:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x11csp908696ybt; Fri, 19 Jun 2020 17:47:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxaaKRnL1BRsboRat8CzUpZ7Gl1KbgDjQ50blZ3SX8PK9GZB4tJSlBe+/4aZ15zl4GTCEq2 X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:14c3:: with SMTP id f3mr6201870edx.341.1592614038190; Fri, 19 Jun 2020 17:47:18 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1592614038; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=EcOyeyS8HCHTs/jJR9w0J6v3720N1jEAezEHfMAMO/Rh3ApxPcS2Yvrl8B6nPK/PPL UjLleUiy/K0y1MqOsBesCM5LXItDEhqFRVsnD9BaYnTggPPRjUJqlMLgSPK9KEurf2iv 15Ru+Z+IBUJbDiToSUgI25G9dc/iFF4er684nGf1NDDT/Y9kaEpGHthO4uJKX3VmzSX1 HcuKbupCJ8PMBxUvhV6ui8F/xDXFOmMANMYlgEZNCr+T0EWippNYC5mBx3XbhSnaqw7t T/Ye1gFW8RDTH0yn2mViTdl39Kn8a/ke7ob9HBjC8mmDdiR/5+T2fwopd1Xj1pHpOk8M VxwQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to :from:dkim-signature; bh=aI6XiHRitPBgbbnOh/n8ddwjMDTFrUl2Fv2ObVl3XbI=; b=CzUUkPDN+Naflt0p6I5e17NhS/Y72gvnxRvR9WKpbROMSWgngii9XrRaW/dmmZKK+D 3VGWpmNvC5gQSc3pNfzShYgT6WFy4bdaIhfK/iMd70AqYCI1KxJ1RrktMWqj318f+gCW G4zNCHcxTqNB7rpZrIU997ATYVbLlON32L9butyiOPWY3tcp1eWT6uyoBpE1gSD0QepF oqXwxsydis1U81NL4VhoNE0rPQqsbe/VOT7Pqzu+Z6zY86Z1oRf9mtphOaTdrgzw8SbV N0tONZSdFZK0eeAovCUKp80Yri4/9tf/HPrkWeo84+LFnYrFYb+UEzwjEZXlRYGne/Zy 4+1Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=TrwAiAqf; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id u9si4154713ejx.370.2020.06.19.17.46.56; Fri, 19 Jun 2020 17:47:18 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=TrwAiAqf; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2391926AbgFSPjj (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 19 Jun 2020 11:39:39 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:60944 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2393674AbgFSP3G (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Jun 2020 11:29:06 -0400 Received: from localhost (83-86-89-107.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 47D8521941; Fri, 19 Jun 2020 15:29:04 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1592580544; bh=xwksin7kz1AKu1fmQXMrhEaDDAygzDT86oLp9iMnLtw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=TrwAiAqf4IpIH/LVcvO3KLJO4HNpnNr6pmgz6WcxNLt3Nk8jt4AameNz4MZYeM7oO FKV6geR/UI7coEQdpIshbRxLYlNIexWikp47PCClynfNAmYJBRDm6GgpwXgo5kmVro 5zXWAiPv9PCwt1qg4GnRG7TOT1mFC7rEKjm2Joyc= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Roberto Sassu , Krzysztof Struczynski , Mimi Zohar , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 5.7 291/376] ima: Set again build_ima_appraise variable Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2020 16:33:29 +0200 Message-Id: <20200619141724.115890770@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.27.0 In-Reply-To: <20200619141710.350494719@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20200619141710.350494719@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.66 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Krzysztof Struczynski [ Upstream commit b59fda449cf07f2db3be3a67142e6c000f5e8d79 ] After adding the new add_rule() function in commit c52657d93b05 ("ima: refactor ima_init_policy()"), all appraisal flags are added to the temp_ima_appraise variable. Revert to the previous behavior instead of removing build_ima_appraise, to benefit from the protection offered by __ro_after_init. The mentioned commit introduced a bug, as it makes all the flags modifiable, while build_ima_appraise flags can be protected with __ro_after_init. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.0.x Fixes: c52657d93b05 ("ima: refactor ima_init_policy()") Co-developed-by: Roberto Sassu Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Struczynski Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c | 10 ++++++++-- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c index 7414443c19bf..e493063a3c34 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c @@ -643,8 +643,14 @@ static void add_rules(struct ima_rule_entry *entries, int count, list_add_tail(&entry->list, &ima_policy_rules); } - if (entries[i].action == APPRAISE) - temp_ima_appraise |= ima_appraise_flag(entries[i].func); + if (entries[i].action == APPRAISE) { + if (entries != build_appraise_rules) + temp_ima_appraise |= + ima_appraise_flag(entries[i].func); + else + build_ima_appraise |= + ima_appraise_flag(entries[i].func); + } } } -- 2.25.1