Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Fri, 19 Jun 2020 18:18:13 +0200
From:   Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com>
To:     Wei Liu <wei.liu@kernel.org>
Cc:     "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
        "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
        "K . Y . Srinivasan" <kys@microsoft.com>,
        Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>,
        Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@microsoft.com>,
        Michael Kelley <mikelley@microsoft.com>,
        linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] scsi: storvsc: Introduce the per-storvsc_device
 spinlock
Message-ID: <20200619161813.GA1596681@andrea>
References: <20200617164642.37393-1-parri.andrea@gmail.com>
 <20200617164642.37393-8-parri.andrea@gmail.com>
 <20200619160136.2r34bdu26hxixv7l@liuwe-devbox-debian-v2>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200619160136.2r34bdu26hxixv7l@liuwe-devbox-debian-v2>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 04:01:36PM +0000, Wei Liu wrote:
> Cc SCSI maintainers
> 
> This patch should go via the hyperv tree because a later patch is
> dependent on it. It requires and ack from SCSI maintainers though.

Right.  Sorry for the Cc: omission...  ;-/

SCSI maintainers, please let me know if you prefer me to send you a new
series with this patch (7/8) and the later/dependent hyperv patch (8/8).

(1-6/8 of this series are hyperv-specific only and have been applied to
the hyperv tree, so this would only 7-8/8 of this series out.)

Thanks,

  Andrea