Received: by 2002:a05:6902:102b:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x11csp998612ybt; Fri, 19 Jun 2020 21:05:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxWdawF3Ff5OSXnSHgCUe9OwT45FuFZPX0xT9o1hAG6TvSQhJNpWzYQYoFkRX6y9rmk7WKe X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:4c2:: with SMTP id g2mr2298427eja.299.1592625943929; Fri, 19 Jun 2020 21:05:43 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1592625943; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=JLuJudvlaJ8DlHb5zaX0T4vx12Cqo+Ny5A497Mfj09pi2Vu8R0ev9dSAf2kKPXIjMb FJ2R9YiKiFEC7SxOY/L77E/DUh2nfT3OlVCsxq/zHACfrtUO2V65LtYQc/uv1rNIsW+m WKRdQATaV1MQiqr77yPCVJsgFHuN+tUp4Mxrv/L2+qSsGKbvtw644QNTFEoQneUsXrAd xBLIR6CQZ9dVRrc4BbFJwLCP6vn+opX5IkGPWU6B/IPBsJTlMM3ceomRWG/j3j6JNujv CyjsZxrFsP9AQp0itT9a/nesQ2XVOo/Z9jS06Ywwux5u7kqo+oDIK0+bHMQCEEAziAxn 7IlQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to :from:dkim-signature; bh=lQlbnzzI83uU2hjEjYcgQJavg+BS3OUrTDlOR8Jlas8=; b=E1F83ZFA20WdJCNw74vCrLs0HqT4EY+EltilYg9mEClecWmtGAr8Xq/SwEVk86lcao M980xup88hV9ohm3B7cCWb1AuG8/OUcwEW6zuiA2uSNv3LCQKQN6TifbYlCSf4cpSZxC DS2jmYk9Rt3j2ucto2xgiHOutWO1sdowauK2no7NSYMYrklugciFgHaBVqOYFNW+LPwU cOeaXqLuMU/O4b0P7mPYO6fOxHRfV3RfOvkJCO7Bnie7tU9PEJVzI6crYJRnmzC2EFSz kCvhGP4RCdIVZJsUxtP7mnk4h0VPv+6SDgnYxbfZccyMWRzwj8Bcte2K6SUg4ifbGO+l YItg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=F6oRga5q; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id b5si6987071edz.386.2020.06.19.21.05.22; Fri, 19 Jun 2020 21:05:43 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=F6oRga5q; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2388462AbgFSQoX (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 19 Jun 2020 12:44:23 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:34292 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2388455AbgFSOnP (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Jun 2020 10:43:15 -0400 Received: from localhost (83-86-89-107.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C617C20CC7; Fri, 19 Jun 2020 14:43:14 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1592577795; bh=qn7AOa62G/27kavDCg6/ccOrtB4coHWNJVvquYcj4Mg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=F6oRga5qwmEw9JkAnP9058FSxJTfTjR0idssvVolWEc3dtKz3rzJbO02zqu121ciF Bj8/SXCDt2F39z8DvsmrMJkFnBwICuxqyeGIGo0KVKw7PjimSqfurnjYFXX7Kl5eWV cjwySp1P5krLQHjeWROETF6vfKekSus2i60hP/qg= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Filipe Manana , David Sterba , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 4.9 063/128] btrfs: do not ignore error from btrfs_next_leaf() when inserting checksums Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2020 16:32:37 +0200 Message-Id: <20200619141623.547732225@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.27.0 In-Reply-To: <20200619141620.148019466@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20200619141620.148019466@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.66 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Filipe Manana [ Upstream commit 7e4a3f7ed5d54926ec671bbb13e171cfe179cc50 ] We are currently treating any non-zero return value from btrfs_next_leaf() the same way, by going to the code that inserts a new checksum item in the tree. However if btrfs_next_leaf() returns an error (a value < 0), we should just stop and return the error, and not behave as if nothing has happened, since in that case we do not have a way to know if there is a next leaf or we are currently at the last leaf already. So fix that by returning the error from btrfs_next_leaf(). Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana Reviewed-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- fs/btrfs/file-item.c | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/file-item.c b/fs/btrfs/file-item.c index d0d571c47d33..4f919628137c 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/file-item.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/file-item.c @@ -779,10 +779,12 @@ again: nritems = btrfs_header_nritems(path->nodes[0]); if (!nritems || (path->slots[0] >= nritems - 1)) { ret = btrfs_next_leaf(root, path); - if (ret == 1) + if (ret < 0) { + goto out; + } else if (ret > 0) { found_next = 1; - if (ret != 0) goto insert; + } slot = path->slots[0]; } btrfs_item_key_to_cpu(path->nodes[0], &found_key, slot); -- 2.25.1