Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v27 11/15] leds: lp55xx: Add multicolor framework
 support to lp55xx
To:     Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@gmail.com>, <pavel@ucw.cz>,
        <robh@kernel.org>
CC:     <kbuild-all@lists.01.org>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        <linux-leds@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
References: <20200615201522.19677-12-dmurphy@ti.com>
 <202006180032.JW0i39C6%lkp@intel.com>
 <0a8a6f57-678d-b1b9-41e5-5e58c15cfe6b@ti.com>
 <58ad7723-131f-6930-00d7-1144c993110c@gmail.com>
 <fc1ae702-0734-973d-9e3c-22b8f8d5c873@ti.com>
 <fc410dfb-70d1-1b8b-3b6d-0de1c6c84ec2@gmail.com>
 <56823113-4875-4813-8627-84b0d1792391@ti.com>
 <bd603f01-2c1b-6167-d88c-3895c1bfdf6c@gmail.com>
 <fad98aa3-cec6-3cde-951f-fa2b57c26d03@gmail.com>
 <04473d1d-5cd8-7d1f-7c5d-8d8b582df464@ti.com>
 <1f5dd2f9-01c7-1f74-9b93-0ae2a6dac915@gmail.com>
From:   Dan Murphy <dmurphy@ti.com>
Message-ID: <69c01524-c4a4-55c8-578e-24b26bc863b8@ti.com>
Date:   Sun, 21 Jun 2020 09:12:58 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1f5dd2f9-01c7-1f74-9b93-0ae2a6dac915@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Jacek

On 6/19/20 5:10 PM, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
> Dan,
>
> On 6/19/20 6:35 PM, Dan Murphy wrote:
>> Jacek
>>
>> On 6/18/20 6:26 PM, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
>>> On 6/19/20 12:09 AM, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
>>>> Dan,
>>>>
>>>> On 6/18/20 11:44 PM, Dan Murphy wrote:
>>>>> Jacek
>>>>>
>>>>> On 6/18/20 4:21 PM, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
>>>>>> Dan,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 6/18/20 12:33 AM, Dan Murphy wrote:
>>>>>>> Jacek
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 6/17/20 4:41 PM, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
>>>>>>>> Dan,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 6/17/20 9:22 PM, Dan Murphy wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Pavel/Jacek
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 6/17/20 11:28 AM, kernel test robot wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Hi Dan,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I love your patch! Yet something to improve:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> [auto build test ERROR on pavel-linux-leds/for-next]
>>>>>>>>>> [cannot apply to j.anaszewski-leds/for-next]
>>>>>>>>>> [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop 
>>>>>>>>>> us a note to help
>>>>>>>>>> improve the system. BTW, we also suggest to use '--base' 
>>>>>>>>>> option to specify the
>>>>>>>>>> base tree in git format-patch, please see 
>>>>>>>>>> https://stackoverflow.com/a/37406982]
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> url: 
>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Dan-Murphy/Multicolor-Framework-v27/20200616-042217 
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> base: 
>>>>>>>>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pavel/linux-leds.git 
>>>>>>>>>> for-next
>>>>>>>>>> config: ia64-randconfig-r015-20200617 (attached as .config)
>>>>>>>>>> compiler: ia64-linux-gcc (GCC) 9.3.0
>>>>>>>>>> reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
>>>>>>>>>> ???????? wget 
>>>>>>>>>> https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross 
>>>>>>>>>> -O ~/bin/make.cross
>>>>>>>>>> ???????? chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
>>>>>>>>>> ???????? # save the attached .config to linux build tree
>>>>>>>>>> ???????? COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-9.3.0 
>>>>>>>>>> make.cross ARCH=ia64
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
>>>>>>>>>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>, old ones prefixed by <<):
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ia64-linux-ld: drivers/leds/leds-lp55xx-common.o: in function 
>>>>>>>>>> `lp55xx_set_mc_brightness':
>>>>>>>>>>>> drivers/leds/leds-lp55xx-common.c:146: undefined reference 
>>>>>>>>>>>> to `led_mc_calc_color_components'
>>>>>>>>>> ia64-linux-ld: drivers/leds/leds-lp55xx-common.o: in function 
>>>>>>>>>> `devm_led_classdev_multicolor_register':
>>>>>>>>>>>> include/linux/led-class-multicolor.h:74: undefined 
>>>>>>>>>>>> reference to `devm_led_classdev_multicolor_register_ext'
>>>>>>>>>> vim +146 drivers/leds/leds-lp55xx-common.c
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ??? 138
>>>>>>>>>> ??? 139??? static int lp55xx_set_mc_brightness(struct 
>>>>>>>>>> led_classdev *cdev,
>>>>>>>>>> ??? 140??????????????????????? enum led_brightness brightness)
>>>>>>>>>> ??? 141??? {
>>>>>>>>>> ??? 142??????? struct led_classdev_mc *mc_dev = 
>>>>>>>>>> lcdev_to_mccdev(cdev);
>>>>>>>>>> ??? 143??????? struct lp55xx_led *led = 
>>>>>>>>>> mcled_cdev_to_led(mc_dev);
>>>>>>>>>> ??? 144??????? struct lp55xx_device_config *cfg = 
>>>>>>>>>> led->chip->cfg;
>>>>>>>>>> ??? 145
>>>>>>>>>> ? > 146 led_mc_calc_color_components(&led->mc_cdev, brightness);
>>>>>>>>>> ??? 147??????? return cfg->multicolor_brightness_fn(led);
>>>>>>>>>> ??? 148
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Well this was a mess to figure out.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The only fix I can figure out here is to remove the
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ???? depends on LEDS_CLASS_MULTI_COLOR || !LEDS_CLASS_MULTI_COLOR
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> from each child device and add
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ???? select LEDS_CLASS_MULTI_COLOR
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> to the LP55XX_COMMON
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This way the Multi color framework will inherit the symbol 
>>>>>>>>> that was set by the COMMON flag which is inherited by majority 
>>>>>>>>> from the child flags.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Did you try this?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/leds/Kconfig
>>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/leds/Kconfig
>>>>>>>> @@ -398,6 +398,7 @@ config LEDS_LP50XX
>>>>>>>> ?config LEDS_LP55XX_COMMON
>>>>>>>> ??????? tristate "Common Driver for TI/National 
>>>>>>>> LP5521/5523/55231/5562/8501"
>>>>>>>> ??????? depends on LEDS_LP5521 || LEDS_LP5523 || LEDS_LP5562 || 
>>>>>>>> LEDS_LP8501
>>>>>>>> +?????? depends on LEDS_CLASS_MULTI_COLOR || 
>>>>>>>> !LEDS_CLASS_MULTI_COLOR
>>>>>>>> ??????? depends on OF
>>>>>>>> ??????? select FW_LOADER
>>>>>>>> ??????? select FW_LOADER_USER_HELPER
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yes I did
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That gave unmet dependencies.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for LEDS_LP55XX_COMMON
>>>>>>> ?? Depends on [m]: NEW_LEDS [=y] && (LEDS_LP5521 [=n] || 
>>>>>>> LEDS_LP5523 [=m] || LEDS_LP5562 [=y] || LEDS_LP8501 [=y]) && 
>>>>>>> (LEDS_CLASS_MULTI_COLOR [=m] || !LEDS_CLASS_MULTI_COLOR [=m]) && 
>>>>>>> OF [=y]
>>>>>>> ?? Selected by [y]:
>>>>>>> ?? - LEDS_LP5562 [=y] && NEW_LEDS [=y] && LEDS_CLASS [=y] && I2C 
>>>>>>> [=y]
>>>>>>> ?? - LEDS_LP8501 [=y] && NEW_LEDS [=y] && LEDS_CLASS [=y] && I2C 
>>>>>>> [=y]
>>>>>>> ?? Selected by [m]:
>>>>>>> ?? - LEDS_LP5523 [=m] && NEW_LEDS [=y] && LEDS_CLASS [=y] && I2C 
>>>>>>> [=y] && (LEDS_CLASS_MULTI_COLOR [=m] || !LEDS_CLASS_MULTI_COLOR 
>>>>>>> [=m])
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> When I was testing that yesterday I also had the same warning at 
>>>>>> some
>>>>>> point of testing different Kconfig setups, but with what I showed 
>>>>>> above
>>>>>> it ceased to appear. Now every time I am doing "make oldconfig" the
>>>>>> CONFIG_LEDS_LP55XX_COMMON=y entry gets changed to =m with the config
>>>>>> from the test bot.
>>>>>>
>>>>> That is not what I saw in my testing especially after doing a 
>>>>> distclean
>>>>
>>>> Could you please give your exact steps after "make distclean" and
>>>> copying test bot config to the kernel root directory?
>>>>
>>>> Also, please share the toolchain you're using for tests.
>>>
>>> Actually at this stage the toolchain is of lesser relevance.
>>>
>>> I've tried once more and indeed the problem shows up.
>>>
>>> It is caused by the driver entries doing
>>>
>>> "select LEDS_LP55XX_COMMON".
>>>
>>> Select sets config to "y" so it conflicts with
>>> "depends on LEDS_CLASS_MULTI_COLOR || !LEDS_CLASS_MULTI_COLOR"
>>> in the "config LEDS_LP55XX_COMMON".
>>>
>>> Your proposed fix will block the possibility of building
>>> LED_CLASS_MULTI_COLOR as a module when LP55XX drivers
>>> are enabled so this is also not an option.
>>>
>>> Solving this riddle will require some more thinking.
>>> I haven't analyzed it in detail but maybe "imply" statement from
>>> kconfig-language.rst could help somehow here. 
>>
>> The multicolor framework will build as a module if the LED_CLASS is 
>> defined as a module.
>>
>> See attached test_defconfig
>
> But it will be impossible to enable CONFIG_LEDS_LP50XX without
> CONFIG_LEDS_CLASS_MULTI_COLOR if you will remove
>
> depends on LEDS_CLASS_MULTI_COLOR || !LEDS_CLASS_MULTI_COLOR.
>
I was not removing the dependency for the LP50xx only the LP55xx.


> This is actually why the above entry was needed.
>
> LP55XX drivers have to work also without multicolor class.
>
Well I am not sure how else to resolve this problem.? Because the LP55xx 
has multi level dependencies.

Only the LP55xx_common has the dependency on the MC framework. The 
device drivers do not.

The issue is the mixing and matching of the MC fw as a module vs the 
LP55XX_COMMON as a built-in.

Dan