Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1591555267-21822-1-git-send-email-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>
 <1591555267-21822-11-git-send-email-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>
In-Reply-To: <1591555267-21822-11-git-send-email-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>
From:   Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Date:   Mon, 22 Jun 2020 14:56:03 +0200
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdUyfv7jQ=kmWRy-zehrgLhE=5=8Pg50seAqnTWV3yKziA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/11] arm64: dts: renesas: Add HiHope RZ/G2N
 Rev2.0/3.0/4.0 board with idk-1110wr display
To:     Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>
Cc:     Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi Prabhakar,

On Sun, Jun 7, 2020 at 8:42 PM Lad Prabhakar
<prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com> wrote:
> The HiHope RZ/G2N variants are advertised as compatible with panel
> idk-1110wr from Advantech, however the panel isn't sold alongside the
> board. New dts's, enabling the lvds node to get the panel to work with
> all the HiHope RZ/G2N variants.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>
> Reviewed-by: Marian-Cristian Rotariu <marian-cristian.rotariu.rb@bp.renesas.com>

Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>

> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/Makefile
> @@ -9,6 +9,8 @@ dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_R8A774B1) += r8a774b1-hihope-rzg2n.dtb \
>                                r8a774b1-hihope-rzg2n-rev2.dtb
>  dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_R8A774B1) += r8a774b1-hihope-rzg2n-ex.dtb \
>                                r8a774b1-hihope-rzg2n-rev2-ex.dtb
> +dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_R8A774B1) += r8a774b1-hihope-rzg2n-ex-idk-1110wr.dtb \
> +                              r8a774b1-hihope-rzg2n-rev2-ex-idk-1110wr.dtb
>  dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_R8A774C0) += r8a774c0-cat874.dtb r8a774c0-ek874.dtb \
>                                r8a774c0-ek874-idk-2121wr.dtb \
>                                r8a774c0-ek874-mipi-2.1.dtb

BTW, the grouping may be more obvious if there would be only a single
"dtb-$(CONFIG_<FOO>)" for each value of <FOO>.
But as that is a pre-existing issue, perhaps I'll just fix all of them
after applying
(the next revision of) this series.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds