Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] counter: Add character device interface
To:     William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@gmail.com>
Cc:     jic23@kernel.org, kamel.bouhara@bootlin.com, gwendal@chromium.org,
        alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, syednwaris@gmail.com,
        patrick.havelange@essensium.com, fabrice.gasnier@st.com,
        mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com, alexandre.torgue@st.com
References: <cover.1592341702.git.vilhelm.gray@gmail.com>
 <afe40ef2e24ecaca44fc229f7983cf4cde3374a8.1592341702.git.vilhelm.gray@gmail.com>
 <8fae0659-56df-c0b5-7c0d-220feefed2b4@lechnology.com>
 <20200621195347.GA59797@shinobu>
From:   David Lechner <david@lechnology.com>
Message-ID: <47ad15e7-05ce-d463-b6af-406365b3c3b4@lechnology.com>
Date:   Mon, 22 Jun 2020 09:08:48 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20200621195347.GA59797@shinobu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 6/21/20 2:53 PM, William Breathitt Gray wrote:
> Synapses simply indicate a change in a Count value

Ah, ok. I understand now that synapse is the wrong term for things like
the change in direction event or error events.

> For example, in the dual-axes positioning table scenario, a user
> application would likely want to know the exact X and Y position at the
> time of a given event -- that means an event should provide two Count
> values (and possibly associated device flags) when it occurs. I'm not
> sure yet how the struct counter_event should be defined in order to
> support this; we will need to indicate the format of data as well as
> provide the data itself. Perhaps, we can handle this by providing an
> unique id field so that only a single datum (e.g. a single count value)
> is provided via the value field, but subsequent struct counter_event
> items share the same id so that the user knows that a particular datum
> is part of a larger group of data for a specific event.

The timestamp could act as the "id" to correlate multiple values of a
single event.