Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751191AbWCZRHT (ORCPT ); Sun, 26 Mar 2006 12:07:19 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751206AbWCZRHS (ORCPT ); Sun, 26 Mar 2006 12:07:18 -0500 Received: from mx02.cybersurf.com ([209.197.145.105]:64730 "EHLO mx02.cybersurf.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751191AbWCZRHQ (ORCPT ); Sun, 26 Mar 2006 12:07:16 -0500 Subject: Re: [Patch 8/9] generic netlink utility functions From: jamal Reply-To: hadi@cyberus.ca To: balbir@in.ibm.com Cc: Shailabh Nagar , linux-kernel , netdev In-Reply-To: <20060326164434.GC13362@in.ibm.com> References: <1142296834.5858.3.camel@elinux04.optonline.net> <1142297705.5858.28.camel@elinux04.optonline.net> <20060326164434.GC13362@in.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: unknown Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 12:06:57 -0500 Message-Id: <1143392817.5184.55.camel@jzny2> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.1.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 608 Lines: 20 On Sun, 2006-26-03 at 22:14 +0530, Balbir Singh wrote: > Jamal, > > Does the implementation of these utilities look ok? We use genlmsg_data() > in the delay accounting code but not genlmsg_len(), hence it might not > be very well tested (just reviewed). > They look fine to me - please resubmit and CC Thomas Graf in case he sees it different. cheers, jamal - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/