Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Mon, 22 Jun 2020 12:00:48 -0400
From:   "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To:     Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
        virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        eperezma@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v8 02/11] vhost: use batched get_vq_desc version
Message-ID: <20200622115946-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
References: <20200611113404.17810-1-mst@redhat.com>
 <20200611113404.17810-3-mst@redhat.com>
 <0332b0cf-cf00-9216-042c-e870efa33626@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <0332b0cf-cf00-9216-042c-e870efa33626@redhat.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 11:19:26AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> 
> On 2020/6/11 下午7:34, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >   static void vhost_vq_free_iovecs(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq)
> >   {
> >   	kfree(vq->descs);
> > @@ -394,6 +400,9 @@ static long vhost_dev_alloc_iovecs(struct vhost_dev *dev)
> >   	for (i = 0; i < dev->nvqs; ++i) {
> >   		vq = dev->vqs[i];
> >   		vq->max_descs = dev->iov_limit;
> > +		if (vhost_vq_num_batch_descs(vq) < 0) {
> > +			return -EINVAL;
> > +		}
> 
> 
> This check breaks vdpa which set iov_limit to zero. Consider iov_limit is
> meaningless to vDPA, I wonder we can skip the test when device doesn't use
> worker.
> 
> Thanks

It doesn't need iovecs at all, right?

-- 
MST