Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Mon, 22 Jun 2020 17:53:19 +0100
From:   Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
To:     Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>
Cc:     andy.shevchenko@gmail.com, michael@walle.cc, robh+dt@kernel.org,
        broonie@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        linus.walleij@linaro.org, linux@roeck-us.net,
        andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, robin.murphy@arm.com,
        gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] mfd: core: Make a best effort attempt to match
 devices with the correct of_nodes
Message-ID: <20200622165319.GX954398@dell>
References: <20200611191002.2256570-1-lee.jones@linaro.org>
 <20200622080913.GO954398@dell>
 <3aa3c8ad-4e6a-9b9b-be58-bd9da5a0fb0a@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <3aa3c8ad-4e6a-9b9b-be58-bd9da5a0fb0a@gmail.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, 22 Jun 2020, Frank Rowand wrote:

> On 2020-06-22 03:09, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Thu, 11 Jun 2020, Lee Jones wrote:
> > 
> >> Currently, when a child platform device (sometimes referred to as a
> >> sub-device) is registered via the Multi-Functional Device (MFD) API,
> >> the framework attempts to match the newly registered platform device
> >> with its associated Device Tree (OF) node.  Until now, the device has
> >> been allocated the first node found with an identical OF compatible
> >> string.  Unfortunately, if there are, say for example '3' devices
> >> which are to be handled by the same driver and therefore have the same
> >> compatible string, each of them will be allocated a pointer to the
> >> *first* node.
> > 
> > Any more reviews/comments before I apply this?
> > 
> 
> Yes, outstanding issues, so please do not apply.
> 
> Shortly after you sent this email, you sent a reply to one of my
> earlier emails in this thread.  I have replied to that email,
> so we still have an ongoing conversation where we are trying
> to resolve my understanding of the problem and whether the
> solution is appropriate.

Happy to discuss whatever issues you're having.

Looks like the ball is in your court. :)

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog