Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Mon, 22 Jun 2020 10:29:12 -0700
From:   "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To:     Keyur Patel <iamkeyur96@gmail.com>
Cc:     allison.henderson@oracle.com, bfoster@redhat.com,
        chandanrlinux@gmail.com, dchinner@redhat.com,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: Couple of typo fixes in comments
Message-ID: <20200622172912.GI11245@magnolia>
References: <20200607073958.97829-1-iamkeyur96@gmail.com>
 <20200607074459.98284-1-iamkeyur96@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200607074459.98284-1-iamkeyur96@gmail.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, Jun 07, 2020 at 03:44:59AM -0400, Keyur Patel wrote:
> ./xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_buf.c:56: unnecssary ==> unnecessary
> ./xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_buf.c:59: behavour ==> behaviour
> ./xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_buf.c:206: unitialized ==> uninitialized
> 
> Signed-off-by: Keyur Patel <iamkeyur96@gmail.com>

Looks simple enough, though I bet this will have to be rebased against
5.8...

Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>

--D

> ---
>  fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_buf.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_buf.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_buf.c
> index 6f84ea85fdd8..5c93e8e6de74 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_buf.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_buf.c
> @@ -53,10 +53,10 @@ xfs_inobp_check(
>   * If the readahead buffer is invalid, we need to mark it with an error and
>   * clear the DONE status of the buffer so that a followup read will re-read it
>   * from disk. We don't report the error otherwise to avoid warnings during log
> - * recovery and we don't get unnecssary panics on debug kernels. We use EIO here
> + * recovery and we don't get unnecessary panics on debug kernels. We use EIO here
>   * because all we want to do is say readahead failed; there is no-one to report
>   * the error to, so this will distinguish it from a non-ra verifier failure.
> - * Changes to this readahead error behavour also need to be reflected in
> + * Changes to this readahead error behaviour also need to be reflected in
>   * xfs_dquot_buf_readahead_verify().
>   */
>  static void
> @@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ xfs_inode_from_disk(
>  	/*
>  	 * First get the permanent information that is needed to allocate an
>  	 * inode. If the inode is unused, mode is zero and we shouldn't mess
> -	 * with the unitialized part of it.
> +	 * with the uninitialized part of it.
>  	 */
>  	to->di_flushiter = be16_to_cpu(from->di_flushiter);
>  	inode->i_generation = be32_to_cpu(from->di_gen);
> -- 
> 2.26.2
>