Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 25 Oct 2001 05:08:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 25 Oct 2001 05:08:07 -0400 Received: from inje.iskon.hr ([213.191.128.16]:39327 "EHLO inje.iskon.hr") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 25 Oct 2001 05:07:52 -0400 To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Marcelo Tosatti , , lkml Subject: Re: xmm2 - monitor Linux MM active/inactive lists graphically In-Reply-To: Reply-To: zlatko.calusic@iskon.hr X-Face: s71Vs\G4I3mB$X2=P4h[aszUL\%"`1!YRYl[JGlC57kU-`kxADX}T/Bq)Q9.$fGh7lFNb.s i&L3xVb:q_Pr}>Eo(@kU,c:3:64cR]m@27>1tGl1):#(bs*Ip0c}N{:JGcgOXd9H'Nwm:}jLr\FZtZ pri/C@\,4lW<|jrq^<):Nk%Hp@G&F"r+n1@BoH From: Zlatko Calusic Date: 25 Oct 2001 11:07:05 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Linus Torvalds's message of "Wed, 24 Oct 2001 21:19:55 -0700 (PDT)") Message-ID: Lines: 37 User-Agent: Gnus/5.090003 (Oort Gnus v0.03) XEmacs/21.4 (Artificial Intelligence) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Linus Torvalds writes: > On 25 Oct 2001, Zlatko Calusic wrote: > > > > Sure. Output of 'vmstat 1' follows: > > > > 1 0 0 0 254552 5120 183476 0 0 12 24 178 438 2 37 60 > > 0 1 0 0 137296 5232 297760 0 0 4 5284 195 440 3 43 54 > > 1 0 0 0 126520 5244 308260 0 0 0 10588 215 230 0 3 96 > > 0 2 0 0 117488 5252 317064 0 0 0 8796 176 139 1 3 96 > > 0 2 0 0 107556 5264 326744 0 0 0 9704 174 78 0 3 97 > > This does not look like a VM issue at all - at this point you're already > getting only 10MB/s, yet the VM isn't even involved (there's definitely no > VM pressure here). That's true, I'll admit. Anyway, -ac kernels don't have the problem, and I was misleaded by the fact that only VM implementation differs in those two branches (at least I think so). > > > Notice how there's planty of RAM. I'm writing sequentially to a file > > on the ext2 filesystem. The disk I'm writing on is a 7200rpm IDE, > > capable of ~ 22 MB/s and I'm still getting only ~ 9 MB/s. Weird! > > Are you sure you haven't lost some DMA setting or something? > No. Setup is fine. I wouldn't make such a mistake. :) If the disk were in some PIO mode, CPU usage would be much higher, but it isn't. This all definitely looks like a problem either in the bdflush daemon, or request queue/elevator, but unfortunately I don't have enough knowledge of that areas to pinpoint it more precisely. -- Zlatko - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/