Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750769AbWC0H3i (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Mar 2006 02:29:38 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750770AbWC0H3i (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Mar 2006 02:29:38 -0500 Received: from ns.virtualhost.dk ([195.184.98.160]:15924 "EHLO virtualhost.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750769AbWC0H3h (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Mar 2006 02:29:37 -0500 Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 09:29:45 +0200 From: Jens Axboe To: Dan Aloni Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Status of NCQ in libata Message-ID: <20060327072945.GC8186@suse.de> References: <20060326192749.GA3643@localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060326192749.GA3643@localdomain> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1011 Lines: 27 On Sun, Mar 26 2006, Dan Aloni wrote: > Hello, > > I'd like to know about the current status of NCQ support in libata, > whether anyone is actively working on it, where I should find a > development branch (there's no ncq branch anymore in libata-dev.git > it seems) and when an upstream merge should be expected. You can give it a spin in the 'ncq' branch in the block layer git repo: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/axboe/linux-2.6-block.git Only one real bit needs to get merged in libata for ncq to be submitted, and that is Tejun's eh rework. Once that is in, ncq becomes a fairly small patch and can probably go straight in. AHCI is still the only supported controller, once NCQ is merged I'm sure a few others will follow. -- Jens Axboe - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/