Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750849AbWC0K1O (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Mar 2006 05:27:14 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750873AbWC0K1N (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Mar 2006 05:27:13 -0500 Received: from gprs189-60.eurotel.cz ([160.218.189.60]:975 "EHLO amd.ucw.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750847AbWC0K1N (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Mar 2006 05:27:13 -0500 Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 12:26:36 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: Mark Lord Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Nigel Cunningham , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH] swsusp: separate swap-writing/reading code Message-ID: <20060327102636.GH14344@elf.ucw.cz> References: <200603231702.k2NH2OSC006774@hera.kernel.org> <200603240713.41566.ncunningham@cyclades.com> <200603232253.01025.rjw@sisk.pl> <442325DA.80300@rtr.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <442325DA.80300@rtr.ca> X-Warning: Reading this can be dangerous to your mental health. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1897 Lines: 46 On Čt 23-03-06 17:48:58, Mark Lord wrote: > Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > >I agree it probably may be improved. Still it seems to be good enough. > >Further, > >it's more efficient than the previous solution, so I consider it as an > >improvement. > >Also this code has been tested for quite some time in -mm and appears to > >behave properly, at least we haven't got any bug reports related to it so > >far. > > I find the in-kernel swsusp to be quite slow, and it seems to use > an awful lot of memory for book-keeping. So count that as encouragement > to improve the performance when you can. Extents will provide 0.01% speedup at most, and with increase of code complexity. Not a nice tradeoff if you ask me. If you want faster suspend, that should be easy. You'll need *current* 2.6.16-git , and userland tools from suspend.sf.net . There's HOWTO that explains how to set it up. We can even do LZF these days... > >Currently I'm not working on any better solution. If you can provide any > >patches to implement one, please submit them, but I think they'll have to > >be > >tested for as long as this code, in -mm. > > It would be *really nice* if you guys could stop being so underhandedly > nasty in every single reply to anything from Nigel. > He really is trying to help, you know. Actually Rafael was *very* nice at him, I'd say. Pointing for tiny inefficiencies, without patch attached is not really helpful. I have repeatedly pointed him on ways how he can *really* help. There are ways to do suspend2 in userspace these days, but Nigel refuses to use them. Pavel -- Picture of sleeping (Linux) penguin wanted... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/