Received: by 2002:a05:6902:102b:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x11csp3702934ybt; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 08:46:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwlkTq0at9EzpNVeR7DEw1nQq1MMdwW/Cp/qdwnrTw0FUVg4tHpPfs889y4OVQPrmtJ2YS+ X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:1d0d:: with SMTP id dg13mr21973010edb.146.1592927181965; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 08:46:21 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1592927181; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=MIGVS0wrIPnQTPe4cx1kD9MHDoxUYhB2NkphjfFmf9HRxf1P5t3nBfZQ4eLyjQONHn mgOC5mrpdsanxiE2toiGWe5+dBa4mgfXWTvHFKBYOYjS9WhGGWOn/3Qv8ddwYYlwgv6n STFwQoQJvLzsJ2AO4tihfTmyT5BgbAz1cbm6exrGCej8YOijHvs8lled+FOtnE6IqwMt zdqY+G2Tem1AhZ0TCQGplpjZoSsWo9dxQUXsGL1+PWvLk70PTQscv5AdlZLmvO6lNcKs l0hJ1byTokRpSk+vWCOu2Dki6HGQ2Oh77AYCkGf2bh9tEE9fTALKBdN4VrGhY0Wtp0Ej noQQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=ZRY4ZBG/P2IAkHTLfCsSPLKOOsiG69vwQ/p/8GWVAx0=; b=ubV782aC7sT4qWJUYugQP0GNgx5VhWb1zCSnCE1HHmfUjUyU84ZXrGq8wDUeNN9h1F yLIZK+kGW3ADqRN9C3mNVuhROgzaiQR+uhOBXR3SY7CscUzSWBRBZVQICH7C1WJD5HPG jcV897pKqttA+sEMkVdqcQSMEofhcHivgtzx27wqzLZldbLElIKkzPAL3xydlakYWafX GEx9FdIMBSe6f5b2A4uty8HQJJX2IOawg5oZ1Sj96hGP+CsBNhREBzYMakVQu38G/zsw 8GXlST+fMB6V6bg+jhh47VDVw/zUEz78KE3msiAnPcjAfTreL4IW58cGb1fciF7IkXTz Y2yQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id dr12si12043798ejc.352.2020.06.23.08.45.58; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 08:46:21 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1733032AbgFWPoJ (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 23 Jun 2020 11:44:09 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:56754 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1733016AbgFWPoI (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Jun 2020 11:44:08 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C82AD1F1; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 08:44:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from e107158-lin.cambridge.arm.com (e107158-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.195.21]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5E8153F6CF; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 08:44:05 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 16:44:03 +0100 From: Qais Yousef To: Vincent Guittot Cc: Mel Gorman , Patrick Bellasi , Dietmar Eggemann , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Randy Dunlap , Jonathan Corbet , Juri Lelli , Steven Rostedt , Ben Segall , Luis Chamberlain , Kees Cook , Iurii Zaikin , Quentin Perret , Valentin Schneider , Pavan Kondeti , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel , linux-fs Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] sched/uclamp: Add a new sysctl to control RT default boost value Message-ID: <20200623154402.jfv5yhhrsbx7toes@e107158-lin.cambridge.arm.com> References: <87v9k84knx.derkling@matbug.net> <20200603101022.GG3070@suse.de> <20200603165200.v2ypeagziht7kxdw@e107158-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <20200608123102.6sdhdhit7lac5cfl@e107158-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <20200611102407.vhy3zjexrhorx753@e107158-lin.cambridge.arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20171215 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Vincent On 06/11/20 14:01, Vincent Guittot wrote: > On Thu, 11 Jun 2020 at 12:24, Qais Yousef wrote: [...] > > > Strange because I have been able to trace them. > > > > On your arm platform? I can certainly see them on x86. > > yes on my arm platform Sorry for not getting back to you earlier but I have tried several things and shared my results, which you were CCed into all of them. I have posted a patch that protects uclamp with a static key, mind trying it on your platform to see if it helps you too? https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200619172011.5810-1-qais.yousef@arm.com/ Thanks -- Qais Yousef