Received: by 2002:a05:6902:102b:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x11csp3711146ybt; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 08:56:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwTxwl8p/DdGfzwwEJQ1dgA/+au6/bsTU79ZOel3Z2J8IAVSVqGSKKQGJ+pRl8F/TYOJLSl X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:9147:: with SMTP id y7mr10668599ejw.399.1592927760140; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 08:56:00 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1592927760; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=y1jQVVrtiPuuRBzJMledSnqIBqvzE6AHUF4+YAD19RT3wAVS9I0YYRbdRC13yKtZKm XBdhMF5TyjLNI6AqVfUvrLh2GhQvanRUghoaRopTnq57Bm9/WKe4yGbH18iOGwe+ZIsl BLPW8tHpC8wRuJhAkk80i9R4mbDXi4w1815WTnym0lysrM5TV4c2Vw1lyWeJ4JDoD7Rc QxVutF2PyZpZH3HF5kJ3Pu/S737m1mbuUfRKAOgvNPtRJ5hCcQYABd+HwN+58EcoaIYR whvlTGb4YQXfaaU1W+1mT8+oGxf+fxYM05lR4TPUWH77dgnwCnk7Xa/PqVhGYEGBXBl6 gY9g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=2M4dPDLeLsejQozbS41vpz4rnLlW8vCdyqTb0kIw2d8=; b=utYAB/GeNlqKXJd+NX+mNDFnVZ65voOOmHRwYD3B6XHan6Wupx2aC5vnDXJzBLQoV6 Mv6IqEOfsn0rl04LxNePToj0MO56sXJ8Xoe0FMgbK0RRjtQIPlN2Xp9jEMSVDvrrvUps UDlNMpLIAo728i01H0eGHSnZMa/rTxlVyyHBs/7iwQuTr2Cwhx3AtT3IpEuh0GQYOw8Y IO9CBGALTq6n4Gb1Rk5hCiMw7ebbaZZaJpXSyqxOTxmGaqZ/aqOxTQFXYuE9VvlJdoTG RQJkdFZ/7g0/5tbeo82ivn4ry9D5A8Zt2Y7LGqDhfqxU2fUNmQM4kMmStLU5aIGX2XAq 335Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@alien8.de header.s=dkim header.b=L3laiMxC; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=alien8.de Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id cn1si6170176edb.354.2020.06.23.08.55.37; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 08:56:00 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@alien8.de header.s=dkim header.b=L3laiMxC; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=alien8.de Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1733023AbgFWPvy (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 23 Jun 2020 11:51:54 -0400 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([5.9.137.197]:58620 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1731870AbgFWPvy (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Jun 2020 11:51:54 -0400 Received: from zn.tnic (p200300ec2f0d470028fe1155168fd3d2.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:ec:2f0d:4700:28fe:1155:168f:d3d2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.skyhub.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTPSA id C05C01EC0318; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 17:51:52 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alien8.de; s=dkim; t=1592927512; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=2M4dPDLeLsejQozbS41vpz4rnLlW8vCdyqTb0kIw2d8=; b=L3laiMxCskkcebkat4zrLZQGr1hD02Dv29rK5VGvx7Sm1nAayDeF6xBed99AUxBGn3rThu bArWMr3Qs5gJg7hDP6BLlgtcGOSPo8e17/oq1Mel0/393sSFGOcCGrIF0aLvviN3EchPeO Xbdwn8DRLHajvZNTd2fREOPxoBsKLBo= Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 17:51:44 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov To: Andrew Cooper Cc: Joerg Roedel , Peter Zijlstra , Andy Lutomirski , Joerg Roedel , Dave Hansen , Tom Lendacky , Mike Stunes , Dan Williams , Dave Hansen , "H. Peter Anvin" , Juergen Gross , Jiri Slaby , Kees Cook , kvm list , LKML , Thomas Hellstrom , Linux Virtualization , X86 ML , Sean Christopherson Subject: Re: Should SEV-ES #VC use IST? (Re: [PATCH] Allow RDTSC and RDTSCP from userspace) Message-ID: <20200623155144.GD32590@zn.tnic> References: <20200425191032.GK21900@8bytes.org> <910AE5B4-4522-4133-99F7-64850181FBF9@amacapital.net> <20200425202316.GL21900@8bytes.org> <20200428075512.GP30814@suse.de> <20200623110706.GB4817@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20200623113007.GH31822@suse.de> <8413fe52-04ee-f4e1-873c-17595110856a@citrix.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <8413fe52-04ee-f4e1-873c-17595110856a@citrix.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 12:51:03PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote: > Crashing out hard if the hypervisor is misbehaving is acceptable.  In a > cloud, I as a customer would (threaten to?) take my credit card > elsewhere, while for enterprise, I'd shout at my virtualisation vendor > until a fix happened (also perhaps threaten to take my credit card > elsewhere). This is called customer, credit-card-enforced bug fixing. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette