Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20200623224813.297077-1-konradybcio@gmail.com>
 <20200623224813.297077-7-konradybcio@gmail.com> <20200623231919.GL128451@builder.lan>
In-Reply-To: <20200623231919.GL128451@builder.lan>
From:   Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 24 Jun 2020 01:30:00 +0200
Message-ID: <CAMS8qEXeFO0vNKHoJeDKKprdECFLVtXOWnphc6iRjOBigeFe1Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/12] arm64: dts: qcom: msm8994: Add SCM node
To:     Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
Cc:     skrzynka@konradybcio.pl, Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
        Anton Vorontsov <anton@enomsg.org>,
        Colin Cross <ccross@android.com>,
        Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
        linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
        DTML <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

>Shouldn't this be "qcom,scm-msm8992", "qcom,scm" ?
>
>(Or rather "qcom,scm-msm8994", "qcom,scm")

Some DTs only have the SoC-specific one, and some also
have the generic one. But I can add the generic one if
you wish.

I went with 8992, as I added it in the 8992 series
(gonna update that one soon, too, so we can get it merged)
and I didn't want to needlessly duplicate it. Ideally maybe we
could switch to just qcom,scm for clockless SCM compats?

Regards
Konrad