Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932197AbWC1F15 (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Mar 2006 00:27:57 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932199AbWC1F15 (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Mar 2006 00:27:57 -0500 Received: from watts.utsl.gen.nz ([202.78.240.73]:54412 "EHLO watts.utsl.gen.nz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932196AbWC1F14 (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Mar 2006 00:27:56 -0500 Subject: Re: [Devel] Re: [RFC] [PATCH 0/7] Some basic vserver infrastructure From: Sam Vilain To: "Serge E. Hallyn" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20060327124517.GA16114@sergelap.austin.ibm.com> References: <20060321061333.27638.63963.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <1142967011.10906.185.camel@localhost.localdomain> <44206B58.5000404@vilain.net> <1142976756.10906.200.camel@localhost.localdomain> <4420885F.5070602@vilain.net> <44241214.7090405@sw.ru> <20060327124517.GA16114@sergelap.austin.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 17:28:13 +1200 Message-Id: <1143523693.7156.23.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 631 Lines: 17 On Mon, 2006-03-27 at 06:45 -0600, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > In particular, the following scenario should be perfectly valid: > > Machine 1 Machine 2 > Xen VM1.1 Xen VM2.1 > vserv 1.1.1 vserv2.1.1 > cont1.1.1.1 cont2.1.1.1 Precisely ... Xen and vserver are complementary, not contradictory. Sam. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/