Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750915AbWC1Mxy (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Mar 2006 07:53:54 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751280AbWC1Mxy (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Mar 2006 07:53:54 -0500 Received: from e35.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.153]:11693 "EHLO e35.co.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750915AbWC1Mxx (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Mar 2006 07:53:53 -0500 Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 06:53:42 -0600 From: "Serge E. Hallyn" To: Kirill Korotaev Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" , haveblue@us.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devel@openvz.org, serue@us.ibm.com, akpm@osdl.org, sam@vilain.net, Alexey Kuznetsov , Pavel Emelianov , Stanislav Protassov Subject: Re: [RFC] Virtualization steps Message-ID: <20060328125342.GB12264@sergelap.austin.ibm.com> References: <44242A3F.1010307@sw.ru> <20060324211917.GB22308@MAIL.13thfloor.at> <4428F902.1020706@sw.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4428F902.1020706@sw.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1645 Lines: 41 Quoting Kirill Korotaev (dev@sw.ru): > >>so IMHO, we should make a kernel branch (Eric or Sam > >>are probably willing to maintain that), which we keep > >>in-sync with mainline (not necessarily git, but at > >>least snapshot wise), where we put all the patches > >>we agree on, and each party should then adjust the > >>existing solution to this kernel, so we get some deep > >>testing in the process, and everybody can see if it > >>'works' for him or not ... > > > >ACK. A collection of patches that we can all agree > >on sounds like something worth aiming for. > > > >It looks like Kirill last round of patches can form > >a nucleus for that. So far I have seem plenty of technical > >objects but no objections to the general direction. > yup, I will fix everything and will come with a set of patches for IPC, > so we could select which way is better to do it :) > > >So agreement appears possible. > Nice to hear this! > > Eric, we have a GIT repo on openvz.org already: > http://git.openvz.org > > we will create a separate branch also called -acked, where patches > agreed upon will go. That's ok by me. If a more neutral name/site were preferred, we could use the sf.net set we had finally gotten around to setting up - www.sf.net/projects/lxc (LinuX Containers). Unfortunately that would likely be just a quilt patch repository. A wiki + git repository would be ideal. -serge - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/