Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Wed, 24 Jun 2020 12:17:42 -0700
From:   Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To:     nao.horiguchi@gmail.com
Cc:     linux-mm@kvack.org, mhocko@kernel.org, mike.kravetz@oracle.com,
        osalvador@suse.de, tony.luck@intel.com, david@redhat.com,
        aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com, zeil@yandex-team.ru,
        naoya.horiguchi@nec.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/15] HWPOISON: soft offline rework
Message-Id: <20200624121742.711331a2a65633a0e16fd9e6@linux-foundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <20200624150137.7052-1-nao.horiguchi@gmail.com>
References: <20200624150137.7052-1-nao.horiguchi@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, 24 Jun 2020 15:01:22 +0000 nao.horiguchi@gmail.com wrote:

> I rebased soft-offline rework patchset [1][2] onto the latest mmotm.  The
> rebasing required some non-trivial changes to adjust, but mainly that was
> straightforward.  I confirmed that the reported problem doesn't reproduce on
> compaction after soft offline.  For more precise description of the problem
> and the motivation of this patchset, please see [2].
> 
> I think that the following two patches in v2 are better to be done with
> separate work of hard-offline rework, so it's not included in this series.
> 
>   - mm,hwpoison: Take pages off the buddy when hard-offlining
>   - mm/hwpoison-inject: Rip off duplicated checks
> 
> These two are not directly related to the reported problem, so they seems
> not urgent.  And the first one breaks num_poisoned_pages counting in some
> testcases, and The second patch needs more consideration about commented point.
> 

It would be nice to have some sort of overview of the patch series in
this [0/n] email.

> [1] v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/1541746035-13408-1-git-send-email-n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com/
> [2] v2: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20191017142123.24245-1-osalvador@suse.de/

The above have such, but are they up to date?