Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] acpi: Extend TPM2 ACPI table with missing log
 fields
To:     Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>,
        Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Jiandi An <anjiandi@codeaurora.org>
Cc:     linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
References: <20200623120636.1453470-1-stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
 <20200623120636.1453470-2-stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
 <20200625000021.GC21758@linux.intel.com>
From:   Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com>
Message-ID: <9d94c704-5774-ceeb-e4f3-010f74ffe37b@linux.ibm.com>
Date:   Wed, 24 Jun 2020 20:38:25 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.4.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20200625000021.GC21758@linux.intel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 6/24/20 8:00 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 08:06:35AM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
>> From: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com>
>>
>> Recent extensions of the TPM2 ACPI table added 3 more fields
>> including 12 bytes of start method specific parameters and Log Area
>> Minimum Length (u32) and Log Area Start Address (u64). So, we extend
>> the existing structure with these fields to allow non-UEFI systems
>> to access the TPM2's log.
>>
>> The specification that has the new fields is the following:
>>    TCG ACPI Specification
>>    Family "1.2" and "2.0"
>>    Version 1.2, Revision 8
>>
>> Adapt all existing table size calculations to use
>> offsetof(struct acpi_table_tpm2, start_method_specific)
>> [where start_method_specific is a newly added field]
>> rather than sizeof(struct acpi_table_tpm2) so that the addition
>> of the new fields does not affect current systems that may not
>> have them.
>>
> I found at least one regression from this patch. Please remove my
> reviewed-by comment form the next version.
>
> Should have:
>
>    Link: https://trustedcomputinggroup.org/wp-content/uploads/TCG_ACPIGeneralSpecification_v1.20_r8.pdf
>
> Please, add this.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com>
>> Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
>> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/char/tpm/tpm_crb.c | 13 ++++++++++---
>>   drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c |  4 +++-
>>   include/acpi/actbl3.h      |  5 +++--
>>   3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_crb.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_crb.c
>> index a9dcf31eadd2..0565aa5482f9 100644
>> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_crb.c
>> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_crb.c
>> @@ -669,7 +669,9 @@ static int crb_acpi_add(struct acpi_device *device)
>>   
>>   	status = acpi_get_table(ACPI_SIG_TPM2, 1,
>>   				(struct acpi_table_header **) &buf);
>> -	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status) || buf->header.length < sizeof(*buf)) {
>> +	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status) || buf->header.length <
>> +			offsetof(struct acpi_table_tpm2,
>> +				 start_method_specific)) {
>>   		dev_err(dev, FW_BUG "failed to get TPM2 ACPI table\n");
>>   		return -EINVAL;
>>   	}
>> @@ -684,14 +686,19 @@ static int crb_acpi_add(struct acpi_device *device)
>>   		return -ENOMEM;
>>   
>>   	if (sm == ACPI_TPM2_COMMAND_BUFFER_WITH_ARM_SMC) {
>> -		if (buf->header.length < (sizeof(*buf) + sizeof(*crb_smc))) {
>> +		if (buf->header.length <
>> +			(offsetof(struct acpi_table_tpm2,
>> +				  start_method_specific) +
> Should be
>
>    offsetof(struct acpti_table_tpm2, log_area_minimum_length)


The old code had sizeof(*buf) with buf being 'struct acpi_table_tpm2' 
and that was equivalent to offsetof(struct acpi_table_tpm2, 
start_method_specific) since 'start_method_specific' is the first new 
field that we are adding right here. Also see 3rd paragraph in the patch 
description. The replacement rule described there should apply to all 
sizeof() calculations on 'struct acpi_table_tpm2.'

I'll address the other issues.


    Stefan