Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932070AbWC1Pxs (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Mar 2006 10:53:48 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932076AbWC1Pxs (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Mar 2006 10:53:48 -0500 Received: from pat.uio.no ([129.240.10.6]:39338 "EHLO pat.uio.no") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932070AbWC1Pxr (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Mar 2006 10:53:47 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.15] Adding kernel-level identd dispatcher From: Trond Myklebust To: Edward Chernenko Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, edwardspec@gmail.com In-Reply-To: <20060328154841.74612.qmail@web37708.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <20060328154841.74612.qmail@web37708.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 10:53:27 -0500 Message-Id: <1143561207.8009.58.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-UiO-Spam-info: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-3.073, required 12, autolearn=disabled, AWL 1.74, FORGED_RCVD_HELO 0.05, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL 0.14, UIO_MAIL_IS_INTERNAL -5.00) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1313 Lines: 39 On Tue, 2006-03-28 at 07:48 -0800, Edward Chernenko wrote: > > --- Trond Myklebust > wrote: > > > Most servers are designed for low latency. A lot of > > them sleep a lot, > > and a fair number of them also go poking around the > > kernel variables > > in /proc (which exists precisely in order to export > > internal kernel > > variables to userspace programs). I'll bet even your > > average Oracle > > database application fits those criteria. > > > > Echo made sense to move into the kernel because in > > addition to the above > > it is a required feature on all Internet hosts, is > > pretty much stateless > > (and/or depends only on internal IP stack state), > > and needs extra low > > latency because it is designed to be used for timing > > purposes by > > clients. > > The same criteria hardly apply to identd. > > If so, then why khttpd _was_ included into kernel? That has been widely acknowledged as a mistake. You'll note that khttpd was removed prior to the release of linux-2.6.0. Nobody misses it. Cheers, Trond - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/