Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 00/18] Enable FSGSBASE instructions
To:     Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        bp@alien8.de, luto@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com,
        dave.hansen@intel.com, tony.luck@intel.com,
        ravi.v.shankar@intel.com, chang.seok.bae@intel.com
References: <87v9ksvoaq.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
 <20200519164853.GA19706@linux.intel.com>
 <7eb45e02-03bf-0af0-c915-794bf49d66d7@cs.unc.edu>
 <87h7w7qy18.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
 <c5fffcd1-c262-7046-a047-67de2bbccd78@cs.unc.edu>
 <87d06opd3a.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
 <e9a0a521-104b-5c3a-a689-78f878e73d31@cs.unc.edu>
 <20200528191910.GC2147934@linux.intel.com>
 <20200528194157.GB1407771@sasha-vm> <20200529030715.GA6182@linux.intel.com>
 <20200529031016.GB6182@linux.intel.com>
From:   Don Porter <porter@cs.unc.edu>
Message-ID: <d0db9590-5c0f-d41c-906f-c5cd0981f138@cs.unc.edu>
Date:   Thu, 25 Jun 2020 11:30:54 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:68.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20200529031016.GB6182@linux.intel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 5/28/20 11:10 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 06:07:23AM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
>>
>> Is there something then readily available to test such workload with SGX
>> enabled? Or should I go patching Graphene? Not sure what I should take
>> from that comment :-)
>>
>> For me the main point is that I need a tool to create arbitrary work
>> loads and run them inside enclave, once the SGX support reaches the
>> upstream. It's not just about testing this particular series.
>>
>> The reason why I've been passive with this work so far is that I've been
>> busy combining updating of SGX series for over two years and maintaining
>> work. Now is the first time when I have time for this.
>>
>> Actually I found this by searching lore.kernel.org whether anything has
>> happend with this. Have had a bullet in my backlog for ages.
> 
> Just need the info if anyone else is going to do something to Graphene
> or not in near future. If not, I will do it myself.
> 
> /Jarkko
> 

In re-reading, I realized you didn't get a clear answer.

We are merging the changes to Graphene to run a patched 5.7 kernel with 
these patches, so it should work for you (or anyone else) once all of 
the changes are merged.  I'd be happy to talk, perhaps off this thread, 
about how we can help you with any other SGX-related kernel testing in 
the future, or issues with running Graphene.

-Don