Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932134AbWC1UO2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Mar 2006 15:14:28 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932136AbWC1UO2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Mar 2006 15:14:28 -0500 Received: from smtpout.mac.com ([17.250.248.97]:7157 "EHLO smtpout.mac.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932134AbWC1UO2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Mar 2006 15:14:28 -0500 In-Reply-To: <200603282204.53493.mmazur@kernel.pl> References: <200603141619.36609.mmazur@kernel.pl> <442783E3.3050808@argo.co.il> <200603271448.56645.rob@landley.net> <200603282204.53493.mmazur@kernel.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <082D0EAB-54E0-4BF4-AEAB-7BDE82E30AD8@mac.com> Cc: Rob Landley , Avi Kivity , Arjan van de Ven , nix@esperi.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, llh-discuss@lists.pld-linux.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Kyle Moffett Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/2] KABI example conversion and cleanup Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 15:13:52 -0500 To: Mariusz Mazur X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.3) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1508 Lines: 31 On Mar 28, 2006, at 15:04:53, Mariusz Mazur wrote: > On Monday 27 March 2006 21:48, Rob Landley wrote: >> Either way, it's not sounding like something I can grab and build >> uClibc systems with any time soon, the way I could use Mazur's >> headers to build uClibc. I'll probably wind up using the gentoo >> headers when the 2.6.14 version ships. > > That's the trouble. While I have nothing against someone (as in -- > not me :) doing all that abi separation, it's not something I can > use straight away. Hell, I don't even get where in all of it I'd > end up with something I could use (granted, I haven't looked into > the thread too closely). Not to mention, that I suspect, that if > there were enough people to do it, it would have gotten done two > years ago. > > So unless anybody's got a better idea, I'll try releasing some > initial version of that llh-ng thingie rather soonish and see how > that'll work out. Anybody with me on that? :) I agree with this approach. I don't think the llh-ng method will be maintainable in the long-term, which is why I'm doing the KABI patches, but I think that in the short term that's the fastest way to get a working set of headers against which to build glibc. Cheers, Kyle Moffett - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/